L-R-TIGER1994
[i]You´re right may be we´re going to see another re-re-re-released of a re-re-re-remaster version of ANATO,[/i]
Thread
Posts in chronological order
pittrek
[QUOTE]
[b]L-R-TIGER1994 wrote: [/b]
[i]You´re right may be we´re going to see another re-re-re-released of a re-re-re-remaster version of ANATO,[/i][/QUOTE]
You forgot re-re-re-re-re-re-re-repackaged
[b]L-R-TIGER1994 wrote: [/b]
[i]You´re right may be we´re going to see another re-re-re-released of a re-re-re-remaster version of ANATO,[/i][/QUOTE]
You forgot re-re-re-re-re-re-re-repackaged
Nareg
oh that means it's disappointing ?!
Marcos Napier
TV Bandeirantes doesn't even have a copy of the Morumbi concert anymore, I suppose... probably the masters were recycled or deleted to save space - this if they even kept the original footage and not just the crappy edited version seen everywhere. Even if they did, it's QPL property as I've once asked them (around 2000 I think).
They buy these things not to be released in the future, but to prevent people making money.
They buy these things not to be released in the future, but to prevent people making money.
thequeen
[QUOTE]
[b]Marcos Napier wrote: [/b]
TV Bandeirantes doesn't even have a copy of the Morumbi concert anymore, I suppose... probably the masters were recycled or deleted to save space - this if they even kept the original footage and not just the crappy edited version seen everywhere. Even if they did, it's QPL property as I've once asked them (around 2000 I think).
They buy these things not to be released in the future, but to prevent people making money.
[/QUOTE]
Yeah , like Rock Montreal you mean ?? And Crappy footage of Live Aid (I thought QP we're concerned about
quality btw , It seems the Live Aid show has no value for them to also restore this is a misery to me !)
I suppose QP management doesn't care for money then based on your statement ?
(don't forget the singles-box-set - wasn't meant to make money either , yea right! )
[b]Marcos Napier wrote: [/b]
TV Bandeirantes doesn't even have a copy of the Morumbi concert anymore, I suppose... probably the masters were recycled or deleted to save space - this if they even kept the original footage and not just the crappy edited version seen everywhere. Even if they did, it's QPL property as I've once asked them (around 2000 I think).
They buy these things not to be released in the future, but to prevent people making money.
[/QUOTE]
Yeah , like Rock Montreal you mean ?? And Crappy footage of Live Aid (I thought QP we're concerned about
quality btw , It seems the Live Aid show has no value for them to also restore this is a misery to me !)
I suppose QP management doesn't care for money then based on your statement ?
(don't forget the singles-box-set - wasn't meant to make money either , yea right! )
Metalhead Jay
I certainly think that "Queen" or the record label should at least give us some "Official" live 1970's footage. They could at least give us the Earls Court and Houston show from 1977. The Hammersmith Christmas shows from 75 and 79 as well. This is long overdue and it's about time. If they want to stop the bad bootlegs from flooding the market, then this should be done. By the way, when are we gonna get the "Queen" anthology or ultimate box set? The Beatles Anthology video/DVD set was great and around 12 hours long. Why can't we get something like this for "Queen"? The footage is definitely there.
Negative Creep
[QUOTE]
[b]Metalhead Jay wrote: [/b]
I certainly think that "Queen" or the record label should at least give us some "Official" live 1970's footage.[/QUOTE]
Unfourtunately EMI have no control over what is released, aside from saying "we're not releasing that". It's safe to say that if EMI owned the band's back catalogue and footage we'd have seen plenty of decent releases by now. Same with The Beatles. If the problem was actually with EMI, QP would be free to release previously unreleased material via anyone they wanted to, as EMI only have the exclusive rights to what is already released.
[b]Metalhead Jay wrote: [/b]
I certainly think that "Queen" or the record label should at least give us some "Official" live 1970's footage.[/QUOTE]
Unfourtunately EMI have no control over what is released, aside from saying "we're not releasing that". It's safe to say that if EMI owned the band's back catalogue and footage we'd have seen plenty of decent releases by now. Same with The Beatles. If the problem was actually with EMI, QP would be free to release previously unreleased material via anyone they wanted to, as EMI only have the exclusive rights to what is already released.
Charlie Gimbert
got any money?