and just when we thought we couldnt get any more ludicrous with this story along comes another kid who wants a DNA test coz he thinks the sprog could be his...
Thread
Posts in chronological order
I've had an older boyfriend when I was 11.
He thought that I'm quite mature for my age. xD
He thought that I'm quite mature for my age. xD
*countdown to when the boy reveals his true age in 3....2......1.....*
"and just when we thought we couldnt get any more ludicrous with this story along comes another kid who wants a DNA test coz he thinks the sprog could be his... " ..... "I'm Spartacus ! No ! I'm Spartacus ! No ! I'm Spartacus ! " 8 -)
Poo, again wrote:
That is messed up.
He does not look like 13.
And she looks much older.
Why the fuck would she have sex with him? It almost makes her a paedophile.
I don't think that word means what you think it means.
There's been a lot of condemnation of the girl based on her appearance. She's 15. A paedophile would prey on her. The girl is a child, as is the boy. The birth of their baby is upsetting (especially for the two kids!), but it in no way should be wielded as a means of framing the girl as a sexual deviant.
Also, keep in mind this is her body after bearing a child to term. Thanks.
Zebonka12 wrote:
But anyway, what I meant to post was; looks like the girl's mother is going to have another baby... there's no way that these kids (however committed) stand a chance of doing the 'parent' thing. Maybe they can share a house with Miss "Oh Look I Have 8 New Babies To Add To The Fifty I'm Hiding From The Authorities".
Sew her legs shut, honestly.
Not sure about the significance of sewing her legs shut, since the
children were conceived via completely non-sexual fertilization. She's
fucked up and misguided, but please refrain from yolking her with
sexual judgments. There are plenty of ways to critique her without
resorting to implied bodily mutilation.
Haha. Trust a QZer to make a serious comment on such an improbable procedure as having ones legs sewn shut.
I don't think that's even possible...
I don't think that's even possible...
i know im old and slow on the uptake now but its only just dawned on me that 'poppa' in the US and in the UK are 2 totally different things lol
Zebonka12 wrote:
Haha. Trust a QZer to make a serious comment on such an improbable procedure as having ones legs sewn shut.
I don't think that's even possible...
Not that it matters much. I once heard a dude tell a woman he wanted to tear out her uterus with his bare hands. Not really possible (to the best of my knowledge) but the intention was hardly sweetness and light. Although I suppose it would make for a fine line of greeting cards...
So it ain't the procedure, not really. It's the sentiment behind it. Sewing her legs shut, whether a viable option or not, is a misplaced critique. She's not 'guilty' of rampant sexcapades, and even if she was, whoopity do. It's the fact that she gave birth to eight children, all of which will probably suffer long-term health problems due to their mother's poor judgment.
I'm not speaking/typing as QZer, just a feminist, which in many people's perception is probably worse. Zebonka, you're one of the few reasons I visit this site; I find you frequently hilarious, and almost always dutifully inappropriate. But some things are a little more sensitive than others.
LozIan wrote:
Not that it matters much. I once heard a dude tell a woman he wanted to tear out her uterus with his bare hands. Not really possible (to the best of my knowledge) but the intention was hardly sweetness and light. Although I suppose it would make for a fine line of greeting cards...
So it ain't the procedure, not really. It's the sentiment behind it. Sewing her legs shut, whether a viable option or not, is a misplaced critique. She's not 'guilty' of rampant sexcapades, and even if she was, whoopity do. It's the fact that she gave birth to eight children, all of which will probably suffer long-term health problems due to their mother's poor judgment.
I'm not speaking/typing as QZer, just a feminist, which in many people's perception is probably worse. Zebonka, you're one of the few reasons I visit this site; I find you frequently hilarious, and almost always dutifully inappropriate. But some things are a little more sensitive than others.
Well met, but I have a compulsion to point out that when I said 'legs' I meant in the sense of actually sewing her legs together, mermaid style. That'll teach me to be on Kaluha while posting on the internet. (!)
Actually, sexual craziness doesn't get on my goat nearly as much as mindless procreation. This is a topic I should only try elucidating on after I've had a nap though, it's 4 AM.
^ if there was 'sexual craziness' and 'goats' involved she would probably live in St Just
Poo, again wrote:
That is messed up.
He does not look like 13.
And she looks much older.
Why the fuck would she have sex with him? It almost makes her a paedophile.
Most boys that age wouldn't mind.
At that age, girls would only pay attention to older guys, so guys just take advantage at any chance they are given.
LozIan wrote:
Poo, again wrote:
That is messed up.
He does not look like 13.
And she looks much older.
Why the fuck would she have sex with him? It almost makes her a paedophile.
I don't think that word means what you think it means.
There's been a lot of condemnation of the girl based on her appearance. She's 15. A paedophile would prey on her. The girl is a child, as is the boy. The birth of their baby is upsetting (especially for the two kids!), but it in no way should be wielded as a means of framing the girl as a sexual deviant.
Also, keep in mind this is her body after bearing a child to term. Thanks.
I don't think the authorities would really care about that logic.
I read in the news recently that there was a child porn ring bust in Montreal, or somewhere in or around Quebec, and a 14-year-old was among those charged with possessing and distributing child porn, which I thought was rather surprising. BUT still sick nonetheless.
Anyone who finds children or teenagers who look like young children sexually attractive are more than mentally disturbed. Surely you can see the reasoning behind Poo, again's comment about pedophilia.
Just curious btw, what IS the legal age of sexual consent over in England?
If that'd happened here, I think they would have gotten in legal trouble or so (involving child services), because ours is 16 years of age by law.
If that'd happened here, I think they would have gotten in legal trouble or so (involving child services), because ours is 16 years of age by law.
inu-liger wrote:
Just curious btw, what IS the legal age of sexual consent over in England?
If that'd happened here, I think they would have gotten in legal trouble or so (involving child services), because ours is 16 years of age by law.
ahh,this is where it gets a bit foggy..
if one of them was OVER 16 then they would get nicked quicker than you can say 'nonce' and placed on the sex offenders register but as they are both UNDER the legal age of 16 then its not as clear as that.
there was a programme on tv here that went into more details but from what i could gather from it,it wasnt illegal for 2 consenting [and thats the word here] under 16's to get jiggy without repercussions from social services.however,social services are monitoring the situation but are not going to prosecute.
if im wrong no doubt someone will correct me
however these rules dont apply in St Just where the old saying 'if it bleeds it breeds' still exist,hence the 3 eyes and the daughters being their own aunts there