Who r the QZ wankers?

[QUOTE][b]Britt, M.D. wrote[/b]:
He can say lies like "Jake lives at home with mommy" yet he can't take the heat if I lie about him.[/QUOTE]
Is anything wrong with that? I mean he maybe lying, but you seem more offended by his alleged statement that you live with your mom.I live with my mom (and dad) and so does my neighbour and many more people i know. What I'm trying to say is that out here in India it is perfectly OK for parents to live with their kid and his/her spouse in the same house. But from your post i get the idea that in your country it is taboo.
And my 2 pence on the subject at hand...its not like anyone from here is going to stalk you in real life; this is just a forum and ignoring anyone just for who they are isn't be the right way to go about it IMO. There have been times when ppl have agreed with TM as well you know. So my advise would be to take each post for what it is and decide whether you wanna support it, attack it or  ignore it.

[QUOTE]





[b]inu-liger wrote: [/b]



Treasure Moment, thequeen, Jake Britt, ken8, Charles Baer, Evan Porada

[/QUOTE]

Does Evan Porada still dare show his fat, deformed and arch-evil digital person here?

[QUOTE]

[b]ThomasQuinn wrote: [/b]

[QUOTE]













[b]inu-liger wrote: [/b]







Treasure Moment, thequeen, Jake Britt, ken8, Charles Baer, Evan Porada





[/QUOTE]
Does Evan Porada still dare show his fat, deformed and arch-evil digital person here?

[/QUOTE]
He hasn't in a while, but I wouldn't put it past him to wait a while longer until he tries to pull his B.S. again

JAMAICAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Might as well ask [img=/images/smiley/msn/tounge_smile.gif][/img] .
 Am I a part of this often mentioned group?

No, my dear, you are not.

The list is simple:

Me - Yara, thequeen, Treasure Moment, Jake Britt, Evan Porada, Charles Baer, Ken8* and the abuser, Charlie Brown, aka Danny.

Copy this list and you're fine, my dear, you'll have a wonderful experience in the website.

Advice:

- Don't speak with us.
- DO NOT PROVIDE US ANY KIND OF PERSONAL INFORMATION.
- Ignore what we write.
- If you feel like having fun, and a lot of people are doing it, join in to ridicule us, but only if there are people enough, otherwise it's stressful and not very funny.
- Do not pay attention to quibbles - "this one does not qualify as wanker, this does." No - all of us in this list DO qualify as wankers and this is at the same time AN ADVICE AND A WARNING.  

Wanker = The wanker is, generally, a very unpleasant people to be with, either because of mental illnesses, stupidity, idiocy; eloquent low IQ people with a vengeance, lack of decency, morals and sense of ridicule; psychos, losers, full-time egomaniacs; repugnant people.

----

People may share attributes of a wanker and fail to qualify as such: not every stupid person is a wanker. The wanker does display two or more of these attributes, BUT IN A VERY HIGH DEGREE AND WITHOUT TRYING TO AVOID SUCH BAD IMPULSES. The wanker doesn't care about being a wanker: he has no remorse, sense of control, ridicule or decency: he or she is only interested in giving vent to his or her repugnant personalities, without caring about people around them.

---

I'm the Queen of the wankers and their representative in all questions, diplomatic or healthy-related ones. That DOES NOT MEAN YOU'RE OK WITH ME - NO! I'm the representative because I deceive people all the time into thinking that I'm not so much of a wanker; I'm the one who manages to be a wanker while representing the role of a normal user. 

That makes me, in certain ways, even more dangerous.

That should put this thread to an end and let the newbies come to our web!

Yara
Wankers Department - Queenzone, Personal Board.

^I love you.

[QUOTE]

[b]Yara wrote:[/b]

Wanker = The wanker is, generally, a very unpleasant people to be with, either because of mental illnesses, stupidity, idiocy; eloquent low IQ people with a vengeance, lack of decency, morals and sense of ridicule; psychos, losers, full-time egomaniacs; repugnant people.[/QUOTE]
You forgot naive and judgemental!

Ockham's razor: avoid introducing units which are unnecessary for the explanation of something.

People who are really naive either suffer from stupidity or have low-IQ. This doesn't qualify them as wankers - really naive people are, in fact, charming in many ways, cause they help us believe in Rousseau's assertion that human being are essentially, naturally good. They add a flavor of romanticism to life and, by doing so, don't annoy other people.

[b]Fake naives - [/b]There are the fake naives: those who put on airs of gullibility in order to advance personal interests. These are manipulative, perverse and usually harmful in the long run; these are more dangerous, mainly out of the web. They lack morals and respect for others and, therefore, are wankers according to the definition above. No need to add the category. I'll return to this.

[b]Judgemental [/b]- Unnecessary. These are wankers by definition - they lack sense of ridicule - they fail to see their own faults - and are very unpleasant to be with, especially if one is the target of the judgmental wanker, 

----------

So, no. I'd recommend users to stick to the above definition of a wanker and both the warnings and advices attending it. 

--------- 

*** People, over time I'd explain more wanker-related doubts.
 *** Bear in mind that, if the definition is to have any usefulness, as I think it has, it can't start harboring under its conceptual framework every single kind of vice or perceived vice - that'd make the category useless in cognitive terms - that is, the things you think you have to add are likely TO FEATURE IN THE LIST ALREADY.
*** Mind that each of us wankers are giving examples of what's a wanker everyday - so if doubts arise, read us briefly and carefully, and that's it. 

--------

Avoiding mistakes:

There are people who have been called wankers and don't belong to the group.

Microwave is by no means a wanker. He comes across as a nice, honest guy and he only draws some bitterness from people because he's not left-wing as 99% of the people on the website. Having a different political opinion, though, does not necessarily, and per se, turns one into a wanker. 

Zebonka12, who raised the doubt above, is no wanker either. He's playful, well-spirited and likes to do jokes, and people whose tolerance to humor is too low may end up mistaking him for a wanker. 

------

Keep the questions coming but, above all, don't forget about the WARNINGS above - because we are usually sick, repugnant and sometimes abusers, we may actually cause some harm to people: it's not to be taken lightly.

Wankers of my kind are the most dangerous, and that's why I am the representative of all 'em, of course. 

Yara
Chief of the wankers division, queenzone forum, personal board.

I wouldn't put Yara in the "wanker" catagory, in the "boring witterer" catagory maybe, but not in the "wanker" catagory.

^I agree.

[QUOTE]

[b]Freya is quietly judging you. wrote: [/b]

I wouldn't put Yara in the "wanker" catagory, in the "boring witterer" catagory maybe, but not in the "wanker" catagory. [/QUOTE]



I'm sorry Yara but I have to agree. You're not a wanker at all, but your posts are just way too long for me to read. I really want to know what you're saying but I just don't have that kind of time. That is my loss though.

I like reading Yara's posts, especially her posts about music - I always learn quite a lot when she goes on and on about what makes her enjoy Queen music ;D

Indeed, Yara's not a wanker.  I think that Yara is a good, thoughtful forum user; someone who is (more or less) articulate and sensible.

Yara's great, abiding flaw is that she seems to have no internal monologue.  I think of hundreds of things while I'm sitting here posting on Queenzone, but I do not write most of them.  Yara seems to put just about everything in...  of course, if I came here with the sole purpose of learning things about fellow QZers, then that'd be great, but usually that's not why I stop by.  No offense intended, I'm sure plenty of people like reading the long posts and whatnot.
I think a bit of eloquence wouldn't go astray.

Yara, you are  not a wanker. Your posts are a delight  to read, filled with useful info [img=/images/smiley/msn/thumbs_up.gif][/img] .