jadedlady wrote:
Yara, you are not a wanker. Your posts are a delight to read, filled with useful info [img=/images/smiley/msn/thumbs_up.gif][/img] .
Agreed. One of the few smart posters here :-)
jadedlady wrote:
Yara, you are not a wanker. Your posts are a delight to read, filled with useful info [img=/images/smiley/msn/thumbs_up.gif][/img] .
inu-liger wrote:
jadedlady wrote:
Yara, you are not a wanker. Your posts are a delight to read, filled with useful info [img=/images/smiley/msn/thumbs_up.gif][/img] .
Agreed. One of the few smart posters here :-)
Lisser wrote:
Freya is quietly judging you. wrote:
I wouldn't put Yara in the "wanker" catagory, in the "boring witterer" catagory maybe, but not in the "wanker" catagory.
I'm sorry Yara but I have to agree. You're not a wanker at all, but your posts are just way too long for me to read. I really want to know what you're saying but I just don't have that kind of time. That is my loss though.
Micrówave wrote:
Page 3 and no Greg Brooks. Interesting. I would have thought he was a headlining act.