vadenuez wrote:
Have you noticed that the word "QUEEN" can be read at great distance, while "Paul Rodgers" gets buried somewhere below?
I wonder how some of you are surprised that the man's gone back with his former band.
Have YOU noticed that if you would have used the same font size for Paul, it would have either taken up two lines or you would need a wider DVD cover.
Then you'd be bitching that the words PAUL RODGERS take up mores space than the word QUEEN.
Then we'd be arguing that they should have made it that the word "QUEEN" should be visible at a great distance, while "Paul Rodgers" should get buried somewhere.
Then I'd argue that if you would have used the same font size for Paul, it would have either taken up two lines or you would need a wider DVD cover.
Then you'd be bitching that the words PAUL RODGERS take up mores space than the word QUEEN.
Then we'd be arguing that they should have made it that the word "QUEEN" should be visible at a great distance, while "Paul Rodgers" should get buried somewhere.
Then I'd argue that if you would have used the same font size for Paul, it would have either taken up two lines or you would need a wider DVD cover.
Then you'd be bitching that the words PAUL RODGERS take up mores space than the word QUEEN.
Then we'd be arguing that they should have made it that the word "QUEEN" should be visible at a great distance, while "Paul Rodgers" should get buried somewhere.
Then I'd argue that if you would have used the same font size for Paul, it would have either taken up two lines or you would need a wider DVD cover.
Then you'd be bitching that the words PAUL RODGERS take up mores space than the word QUEEN.
Then we'd be arguing that they should have made it that the word "QUEEN" should be visible at a great distance, while "Paul Rodgers" should get buried somewhere.
Then I'd argue that if you would have used the same font size for Paul, it would have either taken up two lines or you would need a wider DVD cover.
Then you'd be bitching that the words PAUL RODGERS take up mores space than the word QUEEN.
Then we'd be arguing that they should have made it that the word "QUEEN" should be visible at a great distance, while "Paul Rodgers" should get buried somewhere.
Then I'd argue that if you would have used the same font size for Paul, it would have either taken up two lines or you would need a wider DVD cover.
Then you'd be bitching that the words PAUL RODGERS take up mores space than the word QUEEN.
Then we'd be arguing that they should have made it that the word "QUEEN" should be visible at a great distance, while "Paul Rodgers" should get buried somewhere.
Then I'd argue that if you would have used the same font size for Paul, it would have either taken up two lines or you would need a wider DVD cover.
Then you'd be bitching that the words PAUL RODGERS take up mores space than the word QUEEN.
Then we'd be arguing that they should have made it that the word "QUEEN" should be visible at a great distance, while "Paul Rodgers" should get buried somewhere.
Then I'd argue that if you would have used the same font size for Paul, it would have either taken up two lines or you would need a wider DVD cover.
Then you'd be bitching that the words PAUL RODGERS take up mores space than the word QUEEN.
Then we'd be arguing that they should have made it that the word "QUEEN" should be visible at a great distance, while "Paul Rodgers" should get buried somewhere.
Then I'd argue that if you would have used the same font size for Paul, it would have either taken up two lines or you would need a wider DVD cover.
Then you'd be bitching that the words PAUL RODGERS take up mores space than the word QUEEN.
Then we'd be arguing that they should have made it that the word "QUEEN" should be visible at a great distance, while "Paul Rodgers" should get buried somewhere.
Then I'd argue that if you would have used the same font size for Paul, it would have either taken up two lines or you would need a wider DVD cover.
Then you'd be bitching that the words PAUL RODGERS take up mores space than the word QUEEN.
Then we'd be arguing that they should have made it that the word "QUEEN" should be visible at a great distance, while "Paul Rodgers" should get buried somewhere.
Then I'd argue that if you would have used the same font size for Paul, it would have either taken up two lines or you would need a wider DVD cover.
OH MY GOD!!! MAKE IT STOP!!! I'M FROZEN IN A QUEENZONE THREADLINE!!!!!!
Then you'd be bitching that the words PAUL RODGERS take up mores space than the word QUEEN.
Then we'd be arguing that they should have made it that the word "QUEEN" should be visible at a great distance, while "Paul Rodgers" should get buried somewhere.
Then I'd argue that if you would have used the same font size for Paul, it would have either taken up two lines or you would need a wider DVD cover.
Then you'd be bitching that the words PAUL RODGERS take up mores space than the word QUEEN.
Then we'd be arguing that they should have made it that the word "QUEEN" should be visible at a great distance, while "Paul Rodgers" should get buried somewhere.
Then I'd argue that if you would have used the same font size for Paul, it would have either taken up two lines or you would need a wider DVD cover.
Then you'd be bitching that the words PAUL RODGERS take up mores space than the word QUEEN.
Then we'd be arguing that they should have made it that the word "QUEEN" should be visible at a great distance, while "Paul Rodgers" should get buried somewhere.
Then I'd argue that if you would have used the same font size for Paul, it would have either taken up two lines or you would need a wider DVD cover.