Those Brian's "zzzzzz" before LOMO worths more than €60 that I paid for this box.[/QUOTE]
I think this must be the best moment of the show. I loved it! It was a pretty boring start. I even got a bit angry on Paul- I think he was singing not good enough. And than this little magic!
By the way I have the concert recorded, and it cost me about 3$. But of course, some time later I'll get officilal DVD
i-Fred · Member since
[QUOTE]
[b]Micrówave wrote: [/b]
[QUOTE]
[b]vadenuez wrote: [/b]
Have you noticed that the word "QUEEN" can be read at great distance, while "Paul Rodgers" gets buried somewhere below?
I wonder how some of you are surprised that the man's gone back with his former band.
[/QUOTE]
Have YOU noticed that if you would have used the same font size for Paul, it would have either taken up two lines or you would need a wider DVD cover.
Then you'd be bitching that the words PAUL RODGERS take up mores space than the word QUEEN.
Then we'd be arguing that they should have made it that the word "QUEEN" should be visible at a great distance, while "Paul Rodgers" should get buried somewhere.
Then I'd argue that if you would have used the same font size for Paul, it would have either taken up two lines or you would need a wider DVD cover.
Then you'd be bitching that the words PAUL RODGERS take up mores space than the word QUEEN.
Then we'd be arguing that they should have made it that the word "QUEEN" should be visible at a great distance, while "Paul Rodgers" should get buried somewhere.
Then I'd argue that if you would have used the same font size for Paul, it would have either taken up two lines or you would need a wider DVD cover.
Then you'd be bitching that the words PAUL RODGERS take up mores space than the word QUEEN.
Then we'd be arguing that they should have made it that the word "QUEEN" should be visible at a great distance, while "Paul Rodgers" should get buried somewhere.
Then I'd argue that if you would have used the same font size for Paul, it would have either taken up two lines or you would need a wider DVD cover.
Then you'd be bitching that the words PAUL RODGERS take up mores space than the word QUEEN.
Then we'd be arguing that they should have made it that the word "QUEEN" should be visible at a great distance, while "Paul Rodgers" should get buried somewhere.
Then I'd argue that if you would have used the same font size for Paul, it would have either taken up two lines or you would need a wider DVD cover.
Then you'd be bitching that the words PAUL RODGERS take up mores space than the word QUEEN.
Then we'd be arguing that they should have made it that the word "QUEEN" should be visible at a great distance, while "Paul Rodgers" should get buried somewhere.
Then I'd argue that if you would have used the same font size for Paul, it would have either taken up two lines or you would need a wider DVD cover.
Then you'd be bitching that the words PAUL RODGERS take up mores space than the word QUEEN.
Then we'd be arguing that they should have made it that the word "QUEEN" should be visible at a great distance, while "Paul Rodgers" should get buried somewhere.
Then I'd argue that if you would have used the same font size for Paul, it would have either taken up two lines or you would need a wider DVD cover.
Then you'd be bitching that the words PAUL RODGERS take up mores space than the word QUEEN.
Then we'd be arguing that they should have made it that the word "QUEEN" should be visible at a great distance, while "Paul Rodgers" should get buried somewhere.
Then I'd argue that if you would have used the same font size for Paul, it would have either taken up two lines or you would need a wider DVD cover.
Then you'd be bitching that the words PAUL RODGERS take up mores space than the word QUEEN.
Then we'd be arguing that they should have made it that the word "QUEEN" should be visible at a great distance, while "Paul Rodgers" should get buried somewhere.
Then I'd argue that if you would have used the same font size for Paul, it would have either taken up two lines or you would need a wider DVD cover.
Then you'd be bitching that the words PAUL RODGERS take up mores space than the word QUEEN.
Then we'd be arguing that they should have made it that the word "QUEEN" should be visible at a great distance, while "Paul Rodgers" should get buried somewhere.
Then I'd argue that if you would have used the same font size for Paul, it would have either taken up two lines or you would need a wider DVD cover.
Then you'd be bitching that the words PAUL RODGERS take up mores space than the word QUEEN.
Then we'd be arguing that they should have made it that the word "QUEEN" should be visible at a great distance, while "Paul Rodgers" should get buried somewhere.
Then I'd argue that if you would have used the same font size for Paul, it would have either taken up two lines or you would need a wider DVD cover.
[b]OH MY GOD!!! MAKE IT STOP!!! I'M FROZEN IN A QUEENZONE THREADLINE!!!!!![/b]
Then you'd be bitching that the words PAUL RODGERS take up mores space than the word QUEEN.
Then we'd be arguing that they should have made it that the word "QUEEN" should be visible at a great distance, while "Paul Rodgers" should get buried somewhere.
Then I'd argue that if you would have used the same font size for Paul, it would have either taken up two lines or you would need a wider DVD cover.
Then you'd be bitching that the words PAUL RODGERS take up mores space than the word QUEEN.
Then we'd be arguing that they should have made it that the word "QUEEN" should be visible at a great distance, while "Paul Rodgers" should get buried somewhere.
Then I'd argue that if you would have used the same font size for Paul, it would have either taken up two lines or you would need a wider DVD cover.
Then you'd be bitching that the words PAUL RODGERS take up mores space than the word QUEEN.
Then we'd be arguing that they should have made it that the word "QUEEN" should be visible at a great distance, while "Paul Rodgers" should get buried somewhere.
Then I'd argue that if you would have used the same font size for Paul, it would have either taken up two lines or you would need a wider DVD cover.[/QUOTE]
Nice.....ehehehe
GT · Member since
The new Queen + Paul Rodgers DVD 'Live In Ukraine' has entered the UK music DVD charts at number 2 this week.
[b]1 NEW[/b] Anvil
The Story Of
(Indivision)
[b]2 NEW[/b] [b]Queen & Paul Rodgers
Live In Ukraine
(EMI)
[/b]
[b]3 2[/b] Iron Maiden
Flight 666 - The Film
(EMI)
[b]4 NEW[/b] Various Artists
Woodstock
(Warner Home Video)
[b]5 3[/b] Cast Recording
High School Musical - The Concert
(Walt Disney)
[b]6 6[/b] Who
Amazing Journey - The Story Of
(Universal Pictures)
[b]7 5[/b] Leonard Cohen
Live In London
(Columbia)
[b]8 NEW[/b] Various Artists
Eurovision Song Contest - Moscow 2009
(EMI)
[b]9 14[/b] Jeff Wayne / Cast Recording
The War Of The Worlds - Live On Stage
(Universal Pictures)
[b]10 1[/b] Paul Weller
Just A Dream
(Island)
Top 10 Music DVDs and Videos is compiled by The Official UK Charts Company
Vali · Member since
finally received my pack a couple of days ago and it looks much better than expected. I like the set, also like how the booklet is attached and the information/pics it contains.
That said ... I´m sorry. I keep saying the same I did in the beggining of times: this show is boring. Very boring.
It looks spectacular, the video & sound quality are magnificent, we have this Freedom Square where planes landed during World War II and 350.000 people attending the mega-show .... but it is boring !!!
Ok I won´t go again with the "predictable setlist" discussion ... but the show´s been heavily edited, many songs were shortened during the performance, we have more shots of crazy people in the audience, that blonde beauty and general shots of the square and the stage rather than close shots of the band. I don´t - I can´t - enjoy watching this show. I´m sorry. ROTC, with its lack of virtues too, is much better. To not mention Super Live In Japan: that´s the good QPR DVD.
Where are the recordings of the hot gigs in Milano, Madrid, Santiago and Buenos Aires, QPL ???
come sing with me the last verse of certain BM song:
"... And every evening finds me
The optimist behind me
Gone with my lost opportunity"
cheers!
silver_salmon · Member since
Really is boring!, It's a pity...with the big tour that they made, songs like:
Las palabras de Amor
Under Pressure
A Kind Of Magic
Surf's Up...School's Out (live version was very nice!)
We Believe
would have been interesting to hear them in a album from the tour...but not...always the same setlist with the concert which represents less the tour.
Something like The Iron Maiden documental Flight 666 is more significant...every song from diferents gigs...learn!
I'm waiting for the 2010 for "The digital super-remastered edition" with outtakes of the blonde girl!!!, nice Queen Productions you are very intelligent.
YourValentine · Member since
I got my copy today (DVD + 2 CDs) and I was very surprised that the booklet is firmly glued to the package and cannot be taken out. Is that intentional or did I buy some pirate? Now that I look closer at the pack shots in this thread it seems they all have this...
Vali · Member since
[QUOTE]
[b]YourValentine wrote: [/b]
I got my copy today (DVD + 2 CDs) and I was very surprised that the booklet is firmly glued to the package and cannot be taken out. Is that intentional or did I buy some pirate? Now that I look closer at the pack shots in this thread it seems they all have this...[/QUOTE]
