Announce Queen Cologne, Sartory 6th December 1974 FLAC

[QUOTE]

[b]Ducksoup wrote: [/b]

[QUOTE]

 



[b]Ducksoup wrote: [/b]



 

[QUOTE]

 



 



 



 



 



 



 



[b]sexmachine wrote: [/b]



 



 



 



so, what does the experts say? upgrade or fakemaster?
thanks for uploading anyway!



 



 



 

[/QUOTE]

curious too.
I sent the uploader on Dime a PM.

Hope he answers...




[/QUOTE]


UPDATE!

Today I recieved a PM from the uploader on Dime in wich he confirmed that he was indeed the taper of this show.
Also, he said that he never taped another a Queen show.



[/QUOTE]

OK, nice he answered you !! To complete the info.txt file, can you tell us what his name / surname is ?

So, has he talked about God Save The Queen ? Is it definitely coming from the same concerts ?


Thanks for the transmission of the information.


Regards,

Olivier,
Belgium.


Ps : check your mail box !

I heard back from him too.  He says the whole thing is genuine.

So he must have stopped the recorder, thinking the show was over, but pressed record again once he realized something else was being played... which explains the cut at the beginning of GSTQ.

Thank goodness for places like Dime for the tapers to show up and tell the truth and put the lies of certain collectors to rest.

Does anybody know what is a name/nickname of the taper?

[QUOTE]

[b]PiotreQ wrote: [/b]

Does anybody know what is a name/nickname of the taper?
[/QUOTE]

His ID on Dime is Jogi666.

Thanks!

Thank You very much Marknow, I hope this one will be an upgrade

Best Regards

Thanks!

So should I burn this master and trash the old version? It's shorter (=faster) than the old version; is THIS the correct speed?

[QUOTE]

[b]Mr. Scully wrote: [/b]

So should I burn this master and trash the old version? It's shorter (=faster) than the old version; is THIS the correct speed?[/QUOTE]
Most of the recording plays a bit too fast (minus GSTQ) - but it is all genuine, as the taper confirmed it.

That said, never trash an old copy.  You never know when you might need to reference it for some reason.

[QUOTE]

[b]Sir GH wrote: [/b]

[QUOTE]





[b]Mr. Scully wrote: [/b]



So should I burn this master and trash the old version? It's shorter (=faster) than the old version; is THIS the correct speed?

[/QUOTE]
Most of the recording plays a bit too fast (minus GSTQ) - but it is all genuine, as the taper confirmed it.

That said, never trash an old copy.  You never know when you might need to reference it for some reason.

[/QUOTE]
Yeah, "never trash" - obviously you haven't seen the amount of CD's in my flat :-)

[QUOTE]

[b]Mr. Scully wrote: [/b]

[QUOTE]





[b]Sir GH wrote: [/b]





[QUOTE]













[b]Mr. Scully wrote: [/b]







So should I burn this master and trash the old version? It's shorter (=faster) than the old version; is THIS the correct speed?





[/QUOTE]
Most of the recording plays a bit too fast (minus GSTQ) - but it is all genuine, as the taper confirmed it.





That said, never trash an old copy.  You never know when you might need to reference it for some reason.





[/QUOTE]
Yeah, "never trash" - obviously you haven't seen the amount of CD's in my flat :-)















[/QUOTE]
You can always
1) buy a bigger flat
2) give your collection to another collector :-)

thanks for this wonderful german crownjewels, freddie likes to say the bigger the better, i like to say the older the better.

Please seed!

Please seed!

Please seed!