Fantastic! Thanks so much :)
Thread
Posts in chronological order
Thanks Peter!
Now we only need a speed corrected Boston 1976 recording ;-)
Now we only need a speed corrected Boston 1976 recording ;-)
Thank you very much
thanks!!!!
Rick wrote:
Thanks Peter!
Now we only need a speed corrected Boston 1976 recording ;-)
Sure, why not ? But I can't believe that we are the only 2 persons who hear the speed difference, even the original seeder claims the speed is correct
pittrek wrote:
Rick wrote:
Thanks Peter!
Now we only need a speed corrected Boston 1976 recording ;-)
Sure, why not ? But I can't believe that we are the only 2 persons who hear the speed difference, even the original seeder claims the speed is correct
Nah it's very obvious, Freddie sounds like his balls haven't dropped yet! :-D
pittrek wrote:
Rick wrote:
Thanks Peter!
Now we only need a speed corrected Boston 1976 recording ;-)
Sure, why not ? But I can't believe that we are the only 2 persons who hear the speed difference, even the original seeder claims the speed is correct
It does run about a quarter-tone too fast. But to the average person's credit, they're simply too excited about the recording itself to bother noticing/caring that it runs a bit fast.
To speed-correct a recording in 24/96 quality (ensuring no SBEs) is a bit trickier than a standard 16/44 one. Who's up for the challenge?
Don't look at me. I'm rubbish :)
No you're not a fool dear Pittrek, the recording speed needs a little correction. Bob is alright, the fact that this series of new tapes arrived on Queenzone left us on our asses !! But it's not long before real music lovers like you and others discovered the speed could be corrected, or the Seattle recording needed a different EQ, as Martin was first to say.
Well, now there's some work that needs to be done... who's on it ?
Regards,
Olivier,
Belgium.
Well, now there's some work that needs to be done... who's on it ?
Regards,
Olivier,
Belgium.
I'm not a techie, but I do participate in othere sites.
In a Pink Floyd one, the techies always prefer to work on the highest possible "mode".
They say that allow them have more "room".
Also they mention "32 bit float".
??? and ??? :lol:
For me that's chinese :lol: (with all respect to chinese people)
well, I'm sure here are several techies that will create both 24/96 and 16/44.1 speed corrected of Boston 1976.
btw, thanks again for this work pittrek.
In a Pink Floyd one, the techies always prefer to work on the highest possible "mode".
They say that allow them have more "room".
Also they mention "32 bit float".
??? and ??? :lol:
For me that's chinese :lol: (with all respect to chinese people)
well, I'm sure here are several techies that will create both 24/96 and 16/44.1 speed corrected of Boston 1976.
btw, thanks again for this work pittrek.
Thank you very much for this!!
merci beaucoup
OK, I can try to play with it but I don't guarantee the results [img=/images/smiley/msn/wink_smile.gif][/img]
Thank you very much, Vali!
I really like your artwork and I am waiting for your uploading "Sapporo 82" in the best of the best series :)
I really like your artwork and I am waiting for your uploading "Sapporo 82" in the best of the best series :)