Queen crest Queenzone

Queen & Lizzy - Live in Seattle - remastered master tape transfer

61 posts Page 2 of 5
Thread

Posts in chronological order

· Member since
Fantastic!  Thanks so much :)
· Member since
Thanks Peter!

Now we only need a speed corrected Boston 1976 recording ;-)
John: "It's the one thing I wish I could do - sing."
· Member since
[b]Thank you very much[/b]
<b><font color="blue">Life Is A Bitch...
· Member since
thanks!!!!
· Member since
[QUOTE]

[b]Rick wrote: [/b]
Thanks Peter!

Now we only need a speed corrected Boston 1976 recording ;-)[/QUOTE]

Sure, why not ? But I can't believe that we are the only 2 persons who hear the speed difference, even the original seeder claims the speed is correct
Best of the best http://www.queenzone.com/forums/1109319/best-of-the-best.aspx?page=1
· Member since
[QUOTE]

[b]pittrek wrote: [/b]

[QUOTE]





[b]Rick wrote: [/b]
Thanks Peter!



Now we only need a speed corrected Boston 1976 recording ;-)

[/QUOTE]





Sure, why not ? But I can't believe that we are the only 2 persons who hear the speed difference, even the original seeder claims the speed is correct

[/QUOTE]
Nah it's very obvious, Freddie sounds like his balls haven't dropped yet! :-D
· Member since
[QUOTE]





























[b]pittrek wrote: [/b]





























[QUOTE]





























































[b]Rick wrote: [/b]
Thanks Peter!































Now we only need a speed corrected Boston 1976 recording ;-)





























[/QUOTE]





























































Sure, why not ? But I can't believe that we are the only 2 persons who hear the speed difference, even the original seeder claims the speed is correct





























[/QUOTE]
It does run about a quarter-tone too fast.  But to the average person's credit, they're simply too excited about the recording itself to bother noticing/caring that it runs a bit fast.

To speed-correct a recording in 24/96 quality (ensuring no SBEs) is a bit trickier than a standard 16/44 one.  Who's up for the challenge?
Queenzone is overrun with trolls and circling the drain - join us here instead: http://queenforum.net
· Member since
Don't look at me. I'm rubbish :)
John: "It's the one thing I wish I could do - sing."
· Member since
No you're not a fool dear Pittrek, the recording speed needs a little correction. Bob is alright, the fact that this series of new tapes arrived on Queenzone left us on our asses !! But it's not long before real music lovers like you and others discovered the speed could be corrected, or the Seattle recording needed a different EQ, as Martin was first to say.
Well, now there's some work that needs to be done... who's on it ?



Regards,

Olivier,
Belgium.
wanna trade ?
· Member since
I'm not a techie, but I do participate in othere sites.
In a Pink Floyd one, the techies always prefer to work on the highest possible "mode".
They say that allow them have more "room".
Also they mention "32 bit float".

??? and ??? :lol:

For me that's chinese :lol: (with all respect to chinese people)

well, I'm sure here are several techies that will  create both 24/96 and 16/44.1 speed corrected of Boston 1976.

btw, thanks again for this work pittrek.
· Member since
Thank you very much for this!!
· Member since
merci beaucoup
· Member since
OK, I can try to play with it but I don't guarantee the results [img=/images/smiley/msn/wink_smile.gif][/img]
Best of the best http://www.queenzone.com/forums/1109319/best-of-the-best.aspx?page=1
· Member since
Hi ! this one´s for all of you, but specially for Peter, hope you like it !! :)




· Member since
Thank you very much, Vali!
I really like your artwork and I am waiting for your uploading "Sapporo 82" in the best of the best series :)