I don't think I'm Einstein in music theory (or just music, or just theory) or anything related to Queen.
And that's precisely my point: you don't need to be Einstein to realise that's a voice. Does it mean the poster should get death penalty? No. Does it mean the poster is retarded? No. Does it mean the poster asked something quite obvious? Yes.
Oh, and by the way I'm not insulting the poster at all. And I'm no genius. And I haven't got answer for everything.
I do, however, have an answer for the 'many people said...' point. And it's the one I posted before.
PS: It IS as obvious as 1+1
PS2: Your use of 'your' is incorrect; it should've been 'you are' or 'you're'.
Thread
Posts in chronological order
Sebastian wrote:
PS2: Your use of 'your' is incorrect; it should've been 'you are' or 'you're'.
Thanks for correcting me, you can tell I'm no genius!
I'm glad you're around to correct the silly folks dumb music questions and their grammar too!!!
Ashame you didn't offer a PS3 tho... mines is broke, won't play discs.
(BTW... I shortened the word "though" to make "tho" since we're just on an internet forum... I hope you don't mind? Your text messages must take hours to read).
Van Basten 9 wrote:
Sebastian wrote:
PS2: Your use of 'your' is incorrect; it should've been 'you are' or 'you're'.
Thanks for correcting me, you can tell I'm no genius!
I'm glad you're around to correct the silly folks dumb music questions and their grammar too!!!
Ashame you didn't offer a PS3 tho... mines is broke, won't play discs.
(BTW... I shortened the word "though" to make "tho" since we're just on an internet forum... I hope you don't mind? Your text messages must take hours to read).
Intelligent people can type full words as quickly as idiots can type txtspk. Not saying that you're either, just expressing a view.
Indeed: typing 'your' and 'you're' takes almost as long. It's funny, though, that you focused on that part of my message (a second PS) rather than realising your original one was stupid and pointless.