Sebastian
Updated some corrections including loads of BV's and some equipment stuff.
Thread
Posts in chronological order
andreas_mercury
it is a good site but i think your analysis approach would be so good to see your judgement of the songs you consider to be not-Queen, even when they are actually queen. could you make a non-Queen section to keep yourself happy and then analyise those songs as an exercise?
Sebastian
There's something that could make me way happier: not making such section. So, that's the way it'll remain.
andreas_mercury
but this is only making you to seem like a small minded penis-eater and not a great mind of music, which you could be someday when you grow up and think to the music rather of what you 'like' or 'don't like' that is kindergarden stuff you are acting foolish.
Sebastian
Not adding a section I'm not interested in doesn't make me small-minded.
Not adding a section I'm not interested in doesn't make me penis-eater.
Not adding a section I'm not interested is not kindergarten stuff.
Not adding a section I'm not interested is not acting foolish.
Adding a section I'm not interested in doesn't make me a great mind of music.
Calling a person 'penis-eater' just because he hasn't (and won't) add TCR to a website IS kindergarten stuff.
Calling a person 'penis-eater' just because he hasn't (and won't) add TCR to a website IS acting foolish.
BD doesn't only contain the songs I like, it does contain loads of songs I don't like (e.g. Get Down Make Love).
I'm not saying anything against post-MIH projects. I'm not demonising Maylor for working with other artists. I'm not offending or insulting anybody who likes their projects.
All I'm saying is: if you want to read about their solo activities on my website, just hang on a couple of months, as I plan to add those sections; if you want to read about B-Sides, hang in there, I'm getting to it slowly but steadily. If you want info on demos and stuff, my website's not the place to visit. If you want info on NOBY, TCR and alike, my website's not the place to find that. You can go to some of the excellent websites around like Queenpedia or Ultimatequeen.
If you can't understand it, there's nothing wrong with that. But if you feel you've got to insult me because I don't want to add post-MIH things, then you do have a big problem, which has nothing to do with me.
There's something very important called RESPECT. So please, respect the fact I'm NOT interested in The Cosmos Rocks (never heard it, TBH), and as such, I won't include it on BD. Many people disagree (and they've got all the right to do so), many people agree (and they've got all the right to do so). By insulting me you're not gonna convince me.
Not adding a section I'm not interested in doesn't make me penis-eater.
Not adding a section I'm not interested is not kindergarten stuff.
Not adding a section I'm not interested is not acting foolish.
Adding a section I'm not interested in doesn't make me a great mind of music.
Calling a person 'penis-eater' just because he hasn't (and won't) add TCR to a website IS kindergarten stuff.
Calling a person 'penis-eater' just because he hasn't (and won't) add TCR to a website IS acting foolish.
BD doesn't only contain the songs I like, it does contain loads of songs I don't like (e.g. Get Down Make Love).
I'm not saying anything against post-MIH projects. I'm not demonising Maylor for working with other artists. I'm not offending or insulting anybody who likes their projects.
All I'm saying is: if you want to read about their solo activities on my website, just hang on a couple of months, as I plan to add those sections; if you want to read about B-Sides, hang in there, I'm getting to it slowly but steadily. If you want info on demos and stuff, my website's not the place to visit. If you want info on NOBY, TCR and alike, my website's not the place to find that. You can go to some of the excellent websites around like Queenpedia or Ultimatequeen.
If you can't understand it, there's nothing wrong with that. But if you feel you've got to insult me because I don't want to add post-MIH things, then you do have a big problem, which has nothing to do with me.
There's something very important called RESPECT. So please, respect the fact I'm NOT interested in The Cosmos Rocks (never heard it, TBH), and as such, I won't include it on BD. Many people disagree (and they've got all the right to do so), many people agree (and they've got all the right to do so). By insulting me you're not gonna convince me.
andreas_mercury
i did not even call you a small minded penis eater, to my words I said it make you SEEM like one .... which is fact, you give wrong impressions with such silly petty ideas when in truth you are smart man
Sebastian
So everybody who doesn't have a website with TCR on it seems like a penis eater? Now THAT'S silly, THAT'S petty, THAT'S small minded and THAT'S foolish.
andreas_mercury
those are your words and never mine, you leave out all kinds of factors. maybe the site is written before TCR was released and simple hasn't been updated with the relevent info?
you would love it to be so easy if i was just some guy who hated every web master on the internet but no, i dont hate any of them or you. your reasons for not including some songs that are queen is just kiddie stuff, if i am writing encyclopedia about american presidents i can't lie to people to say there was only 40 just because i did not like bush nixon garfield and reagan, i must include them all even against my own tastes.... you can cry to sleep and say some songs don't exist but they are all. made in heaven is queen album, FACT - you just dont recognize it such in the same way as deaf people dont recognize 4000hz as sound but poor deaf people it's not their choice, yours is a choice and a funny one haha.
you would love it to be so easy if i was just some guy who hated every web master on the internet but no, i dont hate any of them or you. your reasons for not including some songs that are queen is just kiddie stuff, if i am writing encyclopedia about american presidents i can't lie to people to say there was only 40 just because i did not like bush nixon garfield and reagan, i must include them all even against my own tastes.... you can cry to sleep and say some songs don't exist but they are all. made in heaven is queen album, FACT - you just dont recognize it such in the same way as deaf people dont recognize 4000hz as sound but poor deaf people it's not their choice, yours is a choice and a funny one haha.
andreas_mercury
and to same goes for cosmos rocks even if it sucks
Sebastian
> those are your words and never mine
Actually, those words AREyours: YOU wrote the thing about petty, penis eater,etc.
> maybe the site is written before TCR was released and simple hasn't been updated with the relevent info?
The first version of the site was written before TCR, the one I uploaded yesterday was done after, but that doesn't make me be or seem a peniseater.
> , if i am writing encyclopedia about american presidents i can't lie to people to say there was only 40
I'm not lying to perople: did I write TCR does not exist? No. I'm simply not including it in my website. That's completely different.
> just because i did not like bush nixon garfield and reagan,
I do dislike songs like GDML and I still included them, so this point is completely irrelevant.
> i must include them all even against my own tastes....
But BD is not a website to include them all. It, as the banner says, contains the 1971-1991 era. If I'm making an encyclopaedia on American presidents in the 1850-1900 period, I haven't got to include Clinton and that doesn't make me a penis eater, nor it means I'm denying his existence.
> you can cry to sleep and say some songs don't exist but they are all
I haven't said they don't exist. I have said, though, that I won't include them in my website. That's very different. If I'm making an encyclopaedia on American presidents in the 1850-1900 period, I haven't got to include Clinton and that doesn't make me a penis eater, nor it means I'm denying his existence.
> made in heaven is queen album, FACT
Debatable... but I do include MIH on my website so why are you bringing it here?
> and to same goes for cosmos rocks even if it sucks
I don't know if it sucks but I do know I won't include it. If you can't accept it, maybe it's you who's 'small-minded'. If I'm making an encyclopaedia on American presidents in the 1850-1900 period, I haven't got to include Clinton and that doesn't make me a penis eater, nor it means I'm denying his existence.
Actually, those words AREyours: YOU wrote the thing about petty, penis eater,etc.
> maybe the site is written before TCR was released and simple hasn't been updated with the relevent info?
The first version of the site was written before TCR, the one I uploaded yesterday was done after, but that doesn't make me be or seem a peniseater.
> , if i am writing encyclopedia about american presidents i can't lie to people to say there was only 40
I'm not lying to perople: did I write TCR does not exist? No. I'm simply not including it in my website. That's completely different.
> just because i did not like bush nixon garfield and reagan,
I do dislike songs like GDML and I still included them, so this point is completely irrelevant.
> i must include them all even against my own tastes....
But BD is not a website to include them all. It, as the banner says, contains the 1971-1991 era. If I'm making an encyclopaedia on American presidents in the 1850-1900 period, I haven't got to include Clinton and that doesn't make me a penis eater, nor it means I'm denying his existence.
> you can cry to sleep and say some songs don't exist but they are all
I haven't said they don't exist. I have said, though, that I won't include them in my website. That's very different. If I'm making an encyclopaedia on American presidents in the 1850-1900 period, I haven't got to include Clinton and that doesn't make me a penis eater, nor it means I'm denying his existence.
> made in heaven is queen album, FACT
Debatable... but I do include MIH on my website so why are you bringing it here?
> and to same goes for cosmos rocks even if it sucks
I don't know if it sucks but I do know I won't include it. If you can't accept it, maybe it's you who's 'small-minded'. If I'm making an encyclopaedia on American presidents in the 1850-1900 period, I haven't got to include Clinton and that doesn't make me a penis eater, nor it means I'm denying his existence.
andreas_mercury
" but that doesn't make me be or seem a peniseater."
not true because you can seem to be from someone elses perspective, that's out of your control i am afraid ............
not true because you can seem to be from someone elses perspective, that's out of your control i am afraid ............
andreas_mercury
also it is 2010 no one makes books about american presidents 1850-1900 .... ridiculous.
Sebastian
> not true because you can seem to be from someone elses perspective, that's out of your control i am afraid ............
Out of yours too, since you are just one person and what you think doesn't mean anybody else will feel that way.
> also it is 2010 no one makes books about american presidents 1850-1900 .... ridiculous.
Actually, it's not ridiculous, as there are people studying and researching history, and they do it in something you probably don't know called PERIODS. So, it's not ridiculous to have, for instance, a book on Victorian England, or a book on the Carboniferous period.
Peter Burke wrote, some years ago, a book on Early Modern Europe, which is ace.
Maybe YOU don't make books about 1850-1900, but it doesn't mean 'no-one' makes that.
By the way:
http://www.amazon.com/Ireland-American-Emigration-1850-1900-Schrier/dp/0802313175/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1275234008&sr=8-1
http://www.amazon.com/Peterkin-Papers-Lucretia-1820-1900-ebook/dp/B002GKC212/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&m=A3KFLT4F45U0OI&s=digital-text&qid=1275234008&sr=8-2
So... there's absolutely nothing wrong on making a website on Queen Studio Info (1971-1991). It doesn't mean I'm claiming No-One But You (for instance) doesn't exist, it doesn't mean I'm saying it sucks (it doesn't), it doesn't mean I'm a penis eater, it doesn't mean I'm 'small-minded', it doesn't mean I'm foolish.
Out of yours too, since you are just one person and what you think doesn't mean anybody else will feel that way.
> also it is 2010 no one makes books about american presidents 1850-1900 .... ridiculous.
Actually, it's not ridiculous, as there are people studying and researching history, and they do it in something you probably don't know called PERIODS. So, it's not ridiculous to have, for instance, a book on Victorian England, or a book on the Carboniferous period.
Peter Burke wrote, some years ago, a book on Early Modern Europe, which is ace.
Maybe YOU don't make books about 1850-1900, but it doesn't mean 'no-one' makes that.
By the way:
http://www.amazon.com/Ireland-American-Emigration-1850-1900-Schrier/dp/0802313175/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1275234008&sr=8-1
http://www.amazon.com/Peterkin-Papers-Lucretia-1820-1900-ebook/dp/B002GKC212/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&m=A3KFLT4F45U0OI&s=digital-text&qid=1275234008&sr=8-2
So... there's absolutely nothing wrong on making a website on Queen Studio Info (1971-1991). It doesn't mean I'm claiming No-One But You (for instance) doesn't exist, it doesn't mean I'm saying it sucks (it doesn't), it doesn't mean I'm a penis eater, it doesn't mean I'm 'small-minded', it doesn't mean I'm foolish.
andreas_mercury
"Out of yours too, since you are just one person and what you think doesn't mean anybody else will feel that way."
that is obvious but more rally to my banner i see lately when you are outnumbered in debates.
that is obvious but more rally to my banner i see lately when you are outnumbered in debates.
Sebastian
It's interesting that you completely ignored the main points of my post, namely:
- I include MIH in my website
- There's nothing ridiculous about picking a past era, in fact there are professions devoted to that
- There's nothing simple-minded or penis-eater about sticking to an era
- I've never claimed TCR doesn't exist
If I write an encyclopaedia on American presidents from 1850 to 1900, I haven't got to include Clinton, and it doesn't mean I'm denying his existence.
If I write an encyclopaedia on birds, I haven't got to include whales and it doesn't mean I'm denying their existence.
So, if I'm making a website on Queen Studio Info (1971-1991), I haven't got to include anything before or after that (regardless of whether I, or you, or anybody else, may consider it to be Queen or not) and it doesn't mean I'm denying its existence.
- I include MIH in my website
- There's nothing ridiculous about picking a past era, in fact there are professions devoted to that
- There's nothing simple-minded or penis-eater about sticking to an era
- I've never claimed TCR doesn't exist
If I write an encyclopaedia on American presidents from 1850 to 1900, I haven't got to include Clinton, and it doesn't mean I'm denying his existence.
If I write an encyclopaedia on birds, I haven't got to include whales and it doesn't mean I'm denying their existence.
So, if I'm making a website on Queen Studio Info (1971-1991), I haven't got to include anything before or after that (regardless of whether I, or you, or anybody else, may consider it to be Queen or not) and it doesn't mean I'm denying its existence.