Hi ! I am new at that forum, but i only got one question. Why was the Hyde Park 76 newer released? I simply dont belive because of bad quality. I think that in our days, the music business have all the tehnology to improve this show (if is realy such a bad qualuity)
I think that Queen fans all over the world must make pressure on the Queen record house to do such a think. There is too much compilations, and all we need is a good live album, and Hyde park is a very good live show, so i suggest that we Queen fans do such a think.
P. S. Sorry for my bad english!
Goodoldfashionedloverboy · Member since
kruh wrote: Hi ! I am new at that forum, but i only got one question. Why was the Hyde Park 76 newer released? I simply dont belive because of bad quality. I think that in our days, the music business have all the tehnology to improve this show (if is realy such a bad qualuity)
I think that Queen fans all over the world must make pressure on the Queen record house to do such a think. There is too much compilations, and all we need is a good live album, and Hyde park is a very good live show, so i suggest that we Queen fans do such a think.
P. S. Sorry for my bad english! Hello, no bad quality, there is bad managment QP
Goodoldfashionedloverboy · Member since
I would also like to see Hyde Park in high quality.
kruh · Member since
So what can we do about it? I do not want yet another compilation or live album from the eighties. There is enough of this kind of material. Do not get me wrong i love Montreal and Live at the Bowl, but there is nothing from the 70. This is not good and we must do something about that. Does anyone have any suggestions, something must be done, there is also a few other concerts in the seventies, which are worthy of official release. But please not live at the hammersmith, because playlist of the Hyde park and some other concerts is a lot better.
Thanks and best regards.
Goodoldfashionedloverboy · Member since
You could ask such a question to Gary Talor or Gregory Brooks but they either keep silent or say that the remaining members of the group did not give them authority to speak about such things
Sebastian · Member since
That concert does not feature Under Pressure, A Kind of Magic, Radio Ga Ga, I Want to Break Free, Another One Bites the Dust or Crazy Little Thing Called Love. QP think they wouldn't sell shite without those tracks. They're wrong, but do they care?
kruh · Member since
So we have to make pressures on the group or the manegmant, but I do not know how. I can not do this alone. Hence, this must be linked to more people. Now is the perfect opportunity because it is approaching forty years anniversary of the group. We have to be intrusive, I see no alternative options.
Now is the time to do something!
Goodoldfashionedloverboy · Member since
I don`t think tha somethin change in future. If we will press that it`s seems to me that new record company ? QP said to us " Fuck off dear fans and enjoy the fact that you buy from bootleggers and do not ask us about a new type of material that you never seen before
Bigfish · Member since
I've seen and heard bit and pieces over the years ('39, Bo rhap, Sweet lady, prophet song etc.) and frankly it's just not a good performance. Same goes for Hammy '75. I don't want to see QP or the band promoting inferior product just to satisfy die hard fans - it can only damage the bands reputation. Just be happy with the bootlegs on You tube..
The Real Wizard · Member since
Sebastian wrote:
[QUOTE]Radio Ga Ga, I Want to Break Free, Another One Bites the Dust[/QUOTE]
Do they actually realize that it's largely because of these very tracks that their popularity suffered in the US? Most fans on this side of the pond remember the 70s Queen, not 80s Queen. If there was a good DVD from their heyday to buy, maybe more people would appreciate them more and put them up there with the Stones, Zeppelin, etc.
Until then, to the man on the street they'll be that pop band with the moustached guy, instead of that innovative 70s rock band.
The Real Wizard · Member since
Bigfish wrote:
[QUOTE]I've seen and heard bit and pieces over the years ('39, Bo rhap, Sweet lady, prophet song etc.) and frankly it's just not a good performance. Same goes for Hammy '75. I don't want to see QP or the band promoting inferior product just to satisfy die hard fans - it can only damage the bands reputation. Just be happy with the bootlegs on You tube..[/QUOTE]
Hyde Park is the closest thing to a bad show they ever did, since they were so nervous. But most of the bad you hear on youtube is the recording - it's a really bad mix. If they have the multitracks, they could make every song sound about as good as this -> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_PIherBOnYs
They've already cleaned up Hammersmith 75 and broadcast it on TV last year.
mike hunt · Member since
Sir GH wrote: Sebastian wrote:
Radio Ga Ga, I Want to Break Free, Another One Bites the Dust
Do they actually realize that it's largely because of these very tracks that their popularity suffered in the US? Most fans on this side of the pond remember the 70s Queen, not 80s Queen. If there was a good DVD from their heyday to buy, maybe more people would appreciate them more and put them up there with the Stones, Zeppelin, etc.
Until then, to the man on the street they'll be that pop band with the moustached guy, instead of that innovative 70s rock band.
Even in the states, Queen will alway's be considered One of the better Bands of all time. Not the top 5 of the beatles, Stones, Zep, The Who, Hendrix, but the next pack of groups. That will never change here. At least worldwide they're considered a top 5 or 10 of the best. I don't want to date myself, but i remember the late 70's clearly. Queen were pretty freakin huge. Everyone around my way loved them until Hot space. After That they were forgotten. It's not like these days. back then either you liked Rock or Disco., Queen fans felt betrayed, a bit silly isn't it?.... but that's how youngster's were back then....... Pop Stars like Duran Duran came around, and Rock fans Started to discover new hard rock/metal like Iron Maiden.
mike hunt · Member since
Sir GH wrote: Bigfish wrote:
I've seen and heard bit and pieces over the years ('39, Bo rhap, Sweet lady, prophet song etc.) and frankly it's just not a good performance. Same goes for Hammy '75. I don't want to see QP or the band promoting inferior product just to satisfy die hard fans - it can only damage the bands reputation. Just be happy with the bootlegs on You tube..
Hyde Park is the closest thing to a bad show they ever did, since they were so nervous. But most of the bad you hear on youtube is the recording - it's a really bad mix. If they have the multitracks, they could make every song sound about as good as this -> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_PIherBOnYs
They've already cleaned up Hammersmith 75 and broadcast it on TV last year.
Great video of Sweet lady............
jamster1111 · Member since
To be honest. It's probably because musically, the show wasn't very good but the environment was incredible. The main reason why they don't want to release it is because Freddie's singing at that show is off key in a lot of spots.
Gregsynth · Member since
jamster1111 wrote: To be honest. It's probably because musically, the show wasn't very good but the environment was incredible. The main reason why they don't want to release it is because Freddie's singing at that show is off key in a lot of spots.
================== His intonation was fine for the most part. My biggest complaint is the damn FLUTTERING on the video, but that mix/matrix that was shared awhile back was awesome (most of the fluttering was gone).
Then again, we were treated with Queen: Dubbed At Wembley, I think we can handle a few wrong notes (that are live) at Hyde Park.
