Queen crest Queenzone

Hyde park 1976

58 posts Page 2 of 4
Thread

Posts in chronological order

· Member since
kruh ti si pa ziher slovenc :))))
· Member since
well I think that hyde park is not in such poor quality. I belive that listening this version (I downloaded) is slide form that time, like old black/white picture. I can't see point to make it color. it has their own charm.

As the matter of fact I am happy to has this gig. Freddies falceto in "You take my breath away" is very rare (only Edinburg has is too).
· Member since
Greg: Ya but even without the fluttering, he was still off key and songs like Sweet Lady and Flick of the Wrist we're unstable as hell especially with background vocals. If you feel you can't go by the soundboard, just listen to the audience recording. Hyde Park won't be released the same reason why Earls Court won't released. The quality and remastering is not an issue. The real issue is their overall background vocals.
It's late, but it's time to set me free It's late, yes I know but there's no way it has to be Too late, so let the fire take our bodies this night So late, so let the waters take our guilt in the t
· Member since
Ej persuejder. Sem Slovenec saj vidiš, da se matram s to anglešcino. To, da sem kruh nisem mel pojma, foruma nisem še uporabljal. No kaj praviš na to, misliš, da bo kaj iz tega. Malo verjetno ne. Pa naj izdajo kaj drugega iz sedemdesetih, ce že tega ne morejo. To kar eni pravijo, da gre za slabo kvaliteto vokalov najbrž ne drži saj so par pesmi uporabili na dvd- ju A night at the opera. Daj se oglasi kaj, ce te je volja.

Ajd pozdrav, se še kaj cujeva.
· Member since
Calm down you. The new record company is not planning to release Queen concerts as it not commercially profitable.Under the label the new company will release remastered albums (I hope that there will be bonus material) will remove film and everything. Nobody knows about future plans
· Member since
jamster1111 wrote: Greg: Ya but even without the fluttering, he was still off key and songs like Sweet Lady and Flick of the Wrist we're unstable as hell especially with background vocals. If you feel you can't go by the soundboard, just listen to the audience recording. Hyde Park won't be released the same reason why Earls Court won't released. The quality and remastering is not an issue. The real issue is their overall background vocals.

============

Who cares about that stuff anyway? If you can't listen to a whole show without pinpointing stupid errors like being off key/unstable/wrong notes, then why watch a live concert? I'd take Hyde Park and Hammy 1975 over Dubbed At Wembley.

BTW, I have heard the audience recording (Msmamapapa), and the matrix/mix version (on my channel), the vocals are like 95% good. I think we should cut Queen a break because they organized the whole damn event, played for free, and they were nervous as hell (biggest audience of their career up to that point). I think Hyde Park was a great show considering the circumstances. Like what Bob said, most of the "off parts" were audio faults. Any other fault is just stupid to talk about.
I always knew I was a star And now, the rest of the world seems to agree with me-Freddie Mercury
· Member since
Greg: I never said anything about Hammersmith 1975. Now you're just bringing your usual strawman argument. Hammersmith 1975 is a fantastic concert musically. Yes I understand that they were extremely nervous because they were playing in front of 130,000 people for the biggest (so far) concert of their career (and hell, anyone would be nervous), but that's why it's not a good idea to release these types of things. Of course I could watch or listen to a concert without pinpointing certain mistakes or flubs, and I can't stand Dubbed and Wembley just as much as you, but still, I think it would have been much better if they would have filmed one of the Edinburgh gigs of 1976 or perhaps Cardiff, as those would probably make a much better release.

I'm still hoping one day that they'll release Rainbow '74, Hammy '75, or Hammy '79, as musically those concerts are incredible.
It's late, but it's time to set me free It's late, yes I know but there's no way it has to be Too late, so let the fire take our bodies this night So late, so let the waters take our guilt in the t
· Member since
I know you didn't bring up Hammy 1975, but the point is still valid because like Hyde Park, nervousness affected the band's performance in some way (it also didn't help that Freddie and Brian were ill). So I didn't straw-man argument!

As for Wembley, I like it--but there's better concerts on that tour that I would gladly take over that.
I always knew I was a star And now, the rest of the world seems to agree with me-Freddie Mercury
· Member since
Sir GH wrote: Bigfish wrote:

I've seen and heard bit and pieces over the years ('39, Bo rhap, Sweet lady, prophet song etc.) and frankly it's just not a good performance. Same goes for Hammy '75. I don't want to see QP or the band promoting inferior product just to satisfy die hard fans - it can only damage the bands reputation. Just be happy with the bootlegs on You tube..

Hyde Park is the closest thing to a bad show they ever did, since they were so nervous.  But most of the bad you hear on youtube is the recording - it's a really bad mix.  If they have the multitracks, they could make every song sound about as good as this -> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_PIherBOnYs

They've already cleaned up Hammersmith 75 and broadcast it on TV last year. 

Hey Bob! Anyway this Sweet lady footage (from the 25th ANATO 2° DVD) Not is from the QP master but from the " Don Kirshner's Rock Concert " Tapes... if you watch this video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1W1_X7337Ao you can see the mix (video and audio) is Equal...
so,i think Is probably (i hope) the QP master tapes with multitracks have much better quality (Or better audio mix at least ) that this sweet lady version

Greetings!
"I will destroy any man who dares abuse my trust" Freddie Mercury
· Member since
Greg: IMO, Hammersmith 1975 is a much better performance than Hyde Park. Freddie's voice isn't as unstable.
It's late, but it's time to set me free It's late, yes I know but there's no way it has to be Too late, so let the fire take our bodies this night So late, so let the waters take our guilt in the t
· Member since
I know Hammy 1975 is better than Hyde Park--but like Hyde Park, there's better (overall) shows that weren't filmed. Dundee and Liverpool come to mind.

Hammy 1975 and Hyde Park 1976 are alike in the sense that they are good shows (Hammy's being better), but there's better shows from their respective tours. Also, there's factors that impacted the shows slightly (Band nervousness on both, and illness at Hammy).
I always knew I was a star And now, the rest of the world seems to agree with me-Freddie Mercury
· Member since
They were nervous only when performed in London. When they played in other cities, they are not nervous. But is not the case. Why do such as concerts, Hyde Park 19760, live at the Rainbow1974, Hammersmith Odeon 1975 and 1979 are not released, only because that group members were nervous?
· Member since
Hello!

I am the initiator of this forum to make Hyde park  76 officially released. However,
if this is not possible it should be possible to released another concert from this period (but not  Hammersmith 75 this is quite good quality already and the playlist is not so attractive)
Playlist must contain songs such as Liar, Modern Times Rock 'n' Roll, Seven Seas of Rhye, Stone Cold Crazy, White Queen and so on.
The fact that the band was nervous is not an argument because these are only the beginnings of their careers and  the fans also need to hear that too.
 Another fact is that the group has not released anything from this early period,
and that is sad, this is because during this period they created the best
music.

I apologize for bad English.

Respected greeting!
· Member since
I agree with you. proponent, but from your desires are very little dependent
· Member since
I know that I can not do anything alone. There must be more of us!