Amnesty International

Amazon wrote: I also don't selectively quote. 

Right.  I don't see any evidence of that in this thread.   hahahaha

You may not be intelligent enough to realize this, but EVERY single thing I quoted you on, you said in this thread!

Please show me which quote says I support the death penalty  NOT which quote PRETENDS to say I support the death penalty.

"Right.  I don't see any evidence of that in this thread.   hahahaha"

Well, it's true. Certainly in comparison to you.

"Please show me which quote says I support the death penalty  NOT which quote PRETENDS to say I support the death penalty."

You love the word pretend. Pity that you don't know what it means. 

Unlike you, I can read between the lines.

"I didn't call you ignorant, Amazon. That was to Bob."

Uh, I was aware of it. When did I suggest you called me ignorant?

"Bob called whoever "Small Minded". He may have been referring to me, but ended up summing us BOTH up there."

No, only you.

"We're both using Quotes."

Except mine are from this thread. You don't think they're relevant?

"Remember he said he was no longer acknowledging my existance... so I take it he was referring just to you."

Such a child.

"Actually, I thought you were pretty intellegent up until this thread."

Don't worry, I'm still far more intelligent than you.

"You still haven't acknowledged WHERE I supported the death penalty."

Are you really that lazy? I referred to comments that you have said in this thread, find them yourself.

 "Please, quote my words, Mr. Quotations."

Can't you read?!!! I did. Oh, and I'm not a Mr.

"So if I'm a hipocrite/hipicrite (you spelled it both ways genius),"

Wow, spelling mistakes! You must be really desperate. You do realize that compared to you, everyone is a genius?

@ then I guess you're full of shit.?"

Considering that I have proven that you do support the death penalty, I would say that you're full of shit.

@Really???  I was "Pretending"???  That's what you based your rant on?!?!?  Words I pretended to say??"

What the hell are you talking about? LEARN TO READ!

"See, I was right about you too."

If you mean that you know that I'm more intelligent than you, and that I intellectually kicked your ass, then you are right.

"Amazon - Check."

Delusional idiot. If you were a defense lawyer, you would see a shoplifting client get the death penalty in a non-death penalty state. 

That's it for me. I don't think I'll be responding to you again.

"What's wrong with you? Personal growth leaves you susceptible to attacks from small-minded people who will forever quote you on things you said in years past. The best way around this problem is to remain with the same basic set of viewpoints you had when you were 8. Consistency is key here."

So true! :D Sadly, that describes Microwave perfectly.

If you were a prosecuting attorney, your case would be thrown out for heresay and lack of evidence.

For the 4th time, where have you proven that I support the death penalty.

Go away, Amazon. You didn't kick any ass here, there was none to kick. All you did was Selectively Quote, deny you selectively quote, say I supported the death penalty, then say I pretended to support the death penalty.

All you did was show your ass.

But I'd still like to see where I supported the death penalty in all this. Where did I say kill those three examples I posted about? Anyone?

And for fun:

Amazon wrote: You're also not in a position to call anyone ignorant.

Then 25 minutes later:

Amazon wrote: When did I suggest you called me ignorant?

I was pretending, I guess.

I've re-read this because I really am confused at how we got to I support the Death Penalty.  The only thing I wrote that comes close to that is:

Oh, poor Brandon.  He tried to kill himself and we didn't hear his calls for help.  If you asked me, they should have let him finish the job. 

I said HE tried to kill himself... not the state.

Then I said THEY (yes the state) should have let HIM finish the job.

THAT IS HOW YOU CLOWNS GOT THAT I SUPPORT THE DEATH PENALTY???

That's quite a reach.

When I wrote 'You're also not in a position to call anyone ignorant', it was in response to you calling Bob ignorant. What is so difficult to understand?

As for the death penalty, I stated my reasons. I'm also done. I don't mind the odd internet fight, but this one no longer interests me.

OK, hope I didn't hurt you too bad.

Dismissed... lack of evidence and heresay. You lost this so-called internet fight.

I understand why you're "done".  You couldn't find anything concrete... just what you thought I meant  NOT SAID. (5th request)

So this means that you, too, are in no position to call anyone ignorant.  Aren't we all content?

FOUND IT!!!!   But it was not me who stated support for the death penalty!!!!  It was AMAZON!!!!!!

Amazon wrote:  Why bring up three people who were executed, and accuse AI of not telling the whole story, if you don't support capital punishment?!

You also say that 'If you asked me, they should have let him finish the job', which suggests that you absolutely do support capital punishment! Either that, or you don't have much respect for human life.

"See if you feel sorry for these three..."

I feel sorry for anyone who are murdered, whether it be by an individual, or by the state.

I don't get you. You spend an entire thread, about soldiers urinating on corpses, rallying against things that nobody even said, and now for someone who claims to be against the death penalty (which is is probably not true), you are rallying against AI for opposing the death penalty? AI has no secret agenda. Their agenda is pretty clear, unlike yours. Pathetic.

So you fricking idiots (you know who you are) are basing my stance on Capital Punishment off of AMAZON'S interpretation....  and not what I wrote?

Bob you're an idiot
Amazon you're an idiot
TQ you already know
Grateful Fan you should have read more carefully because I think if you did, you wouldn't have gotten your panties crossed but I still have hope for you.

No, I'm done because I'm bored. If you want to take that as you won the fight, go ahead, it still won't change three facts: I proved my case, even my three old niece is more intelligent than you, and if you think a judge would do anything but rule against you, then you are definitely delusional.

Whatever. Yet again you prove that you don't read posts, but whatever.

Oh, and stop with the 5th request crap. I answered your question the first time. Which you ignored. But whatever.

No you just didn't answer it.

You said what you interpreted but you just can't face the fact that it is YOU who twisted this thread into the Pro Death Penalty campaign. You should be ashamed of yourself.

And I'll stop with the 6th request crap when you actually quote something of mine that says what you accuse.

I did for you, why can't you do the same??? Because you can't. I didn't and you just can't get around that fact. You're an antagonist, a common trait around here.

 if you think a judge would do anything but rule against you, then you are definitely delusional.

No, you used heresay and had no evidence.  ANY judge would throw that out.  You do know SOMETHING about the legal system, don't you?  Or are you making that up, too?

Funny thing is your tactics are shared by the other idiots in this thread.  A few times I've had the same dealings with Bob and TQ.  They start their shit and when prompted for fact or proof, it gets twisted into name calling and then they pull the ol' "I'm done with you".

If you could pull a quote, I would fall down and praise your name as the greatest Queenzoner ever.  Fortunately for Queenzone, that won't ever happen with you, TQ, Bob, and the gang.

Gee, what a shock. The sound of silence.