Panchgani wrote:?
Panchgani wrote:?
Panchgani wrote: ?
?
?
Thread
Posts in chronological order
?
Panchgani wrote:
Panchgani wrote:?
Panchgani wrote:?
Panchgani wrote: ?
?
?
MW, you do realize I'm in a different time zone to you? Not to mention that I have a life. How narcissistic and America-centric can you be?
MW, you can enjoy your fictitious victory and your delusions. Goodbye.
Good luck, Amazon. I hope you change your stance on Capital Punishment... since YOU'RE the one who mentions it... not me.
PROOF that you don't read your own posts!!!!!
Thanks, I'll take the win. Go play with your niece.
PROOF that you don't read your own posts!!!!!
Thanks, I'll take the win. Go play with your niece.
Micrówave wrote:
Gee, what a shock. The sound of silence.
Coming from the guy who said "I have a life outside of Queenzone"
Hypocrisy much?
Judging that he was posting like crazy, yes.... and made up the whole Pro Capital Punishment angle, yes.
You, are just a troll in this whole thread... and others too, apparantly. Check the Queenzone section... your and Inu-liger's cry-baby thread.
Why don't you go twist another thread into what you want it to say.... like you guys did here.
You, are just a troll in this whole thread... and others too, apparantly. Check the Queenzone section... your and Inu-liger's cry-baby thread.
Why don't you go twist another thread into what you want it to say.... like you guys did here.
Micrówave wrote: Judging that he was posting like crazy, yes.... and made up the whole Pro Capital Punishment angle, yes.
You, are just a troll in this whole thread... and others too, apparantly. Check the Queenzone section... your and Inu-liger's cry-baby thread.
Why don't you go twist another thread into what you want it to say.... like you guys did here.
That 'Hellbanning' topic had absolutely NOTHING to do with you, you arrogant prick. However, your constant one-sided attacks and jabs at others who don't agree with you is slowly sliding down to Treasure Moment's level of trollocity, so keep it up, you just might get promoted to troll status since you're already halfway there ;-)
Oh yeah, forgot to add, trolls also <b>stalk</b> users they don't like in other topics that have nothing to do with them or their personal views/opinions, and inject their vendetta into said unrelated topics.
Kind of like how you just suddenly appeared on this thread?
What a schmuck.
Go play with your toy guitars, Raptorman. I take it your answer is "B", then ???
What a schmuck.
Go play with your toy guitars, Raptorman. I take it your answer is "B", then ???
Nine pages on, and this is still essentially Micrówave screaming "filthy commie bleeding hearts" at everyone. Just don't bother, there can be no reasonable argument with Micrówave, because *he* decides what is fact and what is not.
Micrówave wrote:catqueen wrote: And in fact, a simple google search revealed their financial audits as the first result. Here it is. I didn't search them for the exact numbers about how they raked in profit for and from executed prisoners, because i'm pretty sure they didn't. Here's the link. http://www.amnesty.org/en/who-we-are/accountability/financial-reportsJust to clarify, you provided me a link to AI's financial reports.... prepared by AI... published by AI... Hmm... I wonder if it looks legit?Could you provide me a link to Irene Khan's financial report? You remember her, since you're all AI experts. She's the one who got £533,103 when she resigned last year, four times her annual salary.?"The payments to outgoing secretary general Irene Khan shown in the accounts of AI (Amnesty International) Ltd for the year ending March 31st 2010 include payments made as part of a confidential agreement between AI Ltd and Irene Khan. It is a term of this agreement that no further comment on it will be made by either party.(http://www.civilsociety.co.uk/finance/news/content/8390/charity_commission_has_no_jurisdiction_over_board_members_payment_from_amnesty)I am sure people making donations to Amnesty, in the belief they are alleviating poverty, never dreamed they were subsidizing a fat cat payout.
I never claimed to be an expert on their admin, just on general stuff. And staff need to be paid, and a lot of companies give pensions, etc. Also, where do most companies financial audits come from, if not from the company?
catqueen wrote:Micrówave wrote:catqueen wrote: And in fact, a simple google search revealed their financial audits as the first result. Here it is. I didn't search them for the exact numbers about how they raked in profit for and from executed prisoners, because i'm pretty sure they didn't. Here's the link. http://www.amnesty.org/en/who-we-are/accountability/financial-reportsJust to clarify, you provided me a link to AI's financial reports.... prepared by AI... published by AI... Hmm... I wonder if it looks legit?Could you provide me a link to Irene Khan's financial report? You remember her, since you're all AI experts. She's the one who got £533,103 when she resigned last year, four times her annual salary.?"The payments to outgoing secretary general Irene Khan shown in the accounts of AI (Amnesty International) Ltd for the year ending March 31st 2010 include payments made as part of a confidential agreement between AI Ltd and Irene Khan. It is a term of this agreement that no further comment on it will be made by either party.(http://www.civilsociety.co.uk/finance/news/content/8390/charity_commission_has_no_jurisdiction_over_board_members_payment_from_amnesty)I am sure people making donations to Amnesty, in the belief they are alleviating poverty, never dreamed they were subsidizing a fat cat payout.
I never claimed to be an expert on their admin, just on general stuff. And staff need to be paid, and a lot of companies give pensions, etc. Also, where do most companies financial audits come from, if not from the company?
I mean, i'm not an expert in general about them either lol. Just i meant i know a small bit about their work.
The Real Wizard wrote:Amazon wrote:
you don't like them because they are left-wing.
I disagree with the suggestion that Amnesty International is left wing.
We need to try and break away from binary thinking. "Not right wing" does not equal "left wing." There is gray area - a wide span of possibilities beyond the cognitive closure and exclusionary mentality that is social conservatism. Most countries acknowledge this by having more than two political parties.
Its weird, cos in the USA pretty much everything seems to be split into left/right, but in the rest of the world the liberal tradition is a lot less rigid or something? I dunno, i wouldn't consider myself left-wing, but in America, i would be considered extremely left.
WHERE IN MY THREAD DID I DEMONSTRATE 'SUPPORT FOR THE DEATH PENALTY'???
Pretty much all of your posts indicate your support of it. You argue that amnesty are wrong in their portrayal of death penalty sufferers as victims. This demonstrates that you believe they are NOT victims, which to me indicates that you believe the death penalty to be just and deserved. You argue that they sugar coat their information and that they should give details of the crimes committed rather then just outlining the circumstances of the people executed. Again, to me, this indicates that you feel that if the crime is severe, that affects whether or not the death penalty is deserved. Those are just two examples of where you sounded like you supported the death penalty.
Pretty much all of your posts indicate your support of it. You argue that amnesty are wrong in their portrayal of death penalty sufferers as victims. This demonstrates that you believe they are NOT victims, which to me indicates that you believe the death penalty to be just and deserved. You argue that they sugar coat their information and that they should give details of the crimes committed rather then just outlining the circumstances of the people executed. Again, to me, this indicates that you feel that if the crime is severe, that affects whether or not the death penalty is deserved. Those are just two examples of where you sounded like you supported the death penalty.