I'm not questioning your integrity John. I want to make that clear. I'm questioning your logic. Where does he claim he did NOT download the track? "I got it from another collector" is not equivalent to "I didn't download the track from Fanthology". Can you not see that?
[QUOTE]I've been in IT for 25 years[/QUOTE]
Impressive... but not really relevant. Unless your punch cards look counterfeit.
I'm pretty confident there's not one school of thought on security at medium sized institutions. John has presented his information and even David has admitted to doing it. Why are we still questioning procedure here... move along counselor.
You're right Microwave, it's not relevant, except to illustrate that I understand watermarking and it's not some impenetrable rocket science that has the potential to muddy anything here. David has not admitted to doing what John has alleged i.e. uploaded Fanthology material without having received from an alternate source.
And you are a poor logician John. Jesus Christ I feel like I'm trying to shout through water to no one.
Perhaps there was a 2nd trader in the grassy knoll???
Where did he tell you he didn't download it? Do you feel you've demonstrated that with the correspondence you've posted?
Has the "other trader" been identified by David or has that "other trader" come forward to corroborate David's claim?
[QUOTE]You want to see the pimples on my ass too?[/QUOTE]
That was leaked years ago. We want the rare stuff!!!!!
