Cause it's Knebworth
Tapping on the toe with a cam source
Ooh just filming
Driving along like the swing king
Feeling the beat of my heart huh!
Feeling the beat of my heart...
fr1986 · Member since
just remember this, when they released wembley dvd in 2003 they even said "some" of the previous night was recorded. Big lie!!!
2011. Full 1st wembley night concert was released
Check it here
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lffojH0GDME
the director is the one who acknowledges it. "some" haha!
That does not mean that knebworth will be ever release though. Only time will tell
Gaabiizz · Member since
[QUOTE]
[b]fr1986 wrote: [/b] just remember this, when they released wembley dvd in 2003 they even said "some" of the previous night was recorded. Big lie!!! 2011. Full 1st wembley night concert was released Check it here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lffojH0GDME the director is the one who acknowledges it. "some" haha!
That does not mean that knebworth will be ever release though. Only time will tell[/QUOTE] All right!
Gaabiizz · Member since
[QUOTE]
[b]pittrek wrote: [/b] [QUOTE] [b]Gaabiizz wrote:[/b] [QUOTE] [b]pittrek wrote: [/b] [QUOTE] [b]Gaabiizz wrote:[/b]Knebworth complete video , exist ;[/QUOTE] No ? Proofs ?[/QUOTE] Are many proofs ;[/QUOTE] No, no, no. That's not an answer.
You wrote "Knebworth complete video exists". You have the right to claim something like this if : 1) you have the complete video 2) you have seen the complete video 3) somebody with access to either the official Queen archives or something similar claims that the complete video exists
Otherwise it's only your assumption, that the video exists.[/QUOTE] I remember seeing a short of Another One Bites The Dust
pittrek · Member since
But Another One Bites The Dust is not the "Complete concert". That's what I'm trying to explain you, that logically you can't assume that if a video recording of part of a concert exists that it means that the COMPLETE recording exists
emrabt · Member since
But Another One Bites The Dust is not the "Complete concert". That's what I'm trying to explain you, that logically you can't assume that if a video recording of part of a concert exists that it means that the COMPLETE recording exists
=============
Give up, just give up, some people are in total denial about these things, no one telling them otherwise convinces them.
They could search the queen archives themselves and then accuse queen of hiding it when they don’t find it.