THE CO DISCOVERER OF HIV Prof. Luc Montagnier's Extended House of Numbers

THE CO DISCOVERER OF HIV Prof. Luc Montagnier's Extended House of Numbers Interview

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PyPq-waF-h4&list=PL9996C6698A0BE6DA&index=2&feature=plpp_video

House of Numbers, Full Documentary
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BwgmzbnckII&feature=related


In House of Numbers: Anatomy of an Epidemic, an AIDS film like no other, the HIV/AIDS story is being rewritten. This is the first film to present the uncensored POVs of virtually all the major players; in their own settings, in their own words. It rocks the foundation upon which all conventional wisdom
regarding HIV/AIDS is based. House of Numbers could well be the opening volley in a battle to bring sanity and clarity to an epidemic gone awry.

House of Numbers Website
http://www.houseofnumbers.com

comments from queen fans

I love queen and i hate to say it but Freddie was very wreckless during his stardom life. He used alot of drugs and antibiotics and sexual partners and didnt really care about himself? until he weakened his own immune system enough to go to the doctors who saw Karposi Sarcoma on his arm according to Jim Hutton. We now know from the use of amyl nitrate..The doctor gave him an aids diagnosis without a HIV test (FACT!) He took AZT and other drugs right up until 2 weeks before he died. AZT killed him

Thinkagain6 in reply to IJustPiercedMyBrain (Show the comment) 1 week ago 2

they killed? Freddie...

IJustPiercedMyBrain 2 weeks ago 3

ffs.........

[QUOTE] [b]mooghead wrote:[/b]
ffs.........[/QUOTE]

Yes
For Freddie's sake, and for the sake of millions of others also.

If you ever saw a person die of AIDS you know that this person did not die because the CDC in America invented the disease for money, that is so ridiculous. The main cause for HIV/AIDS is ignorance and in countries where campaigns were successfully conducted to educate people the infection rate has dropped to "insignificant".

To claim that the pharmaceutical indstry is not interested in finding a cure is just as stupid as cynical: a pharmaceutical company finding a cure for AIDS would make billions from this cure and/or vaccination. The fact that Africa is now the continent with the worst AIDS rate only shows that lack education and knowledge avoids to beat the virus. Claiming that HIV and AIDS do not really exist is just telling people to die of ignorance. The only appropriate answer to HIV/AIDS is relentlessly campaigning for people to protect themselves. Anything else is irresponsible and plain stupid.

What you say about Freddie not having been tested is just plain wrong. He was tested twice and he was infected. It does not matter where he was infected and how many sexual partners he had - nobody deserves to die that way and nobody has the right to blame the disease on the victims.

A pity that such rubbish is found on a Queen message board.

"A pity that such rubbish is found on a Queen message board."

Of course, one COULD also clean up such rubbish ;)

[QUOTE] [b]inu-liger wrote:[/b]
"A pity that such rubbish is found on a Queen message board."
Of course, one COULD also clean up such rubbish ;)[/QUOTE]

A pity that such rubbish is found on a Queen message board.
==================
O.0

[QUOTE] [b]YourValentine wrote:[/b]
If you ever saw a person die of AIDS you know that this person did not die because the CDC in America invented the disease for money, that is so ridiculous. The main cause for HIV/AIDS is ignorance and in countries where campaigns were successfully conducted to educate people the infection rate has dropped to "insignificant".
To claim that the pharmaceutical indstry is not interested in finding a cure is just as stupid as cynical: a pharmaceutical company finding a cure for AIDS would make billions from this cure and/or vaccination. The fact that Africa is now the continent with the worst AIDS rate only shows that lack education and knowledge avoids to beat the virus. Claiming that HIV and AIDS do not really exist is just telling people to die of ignorance. The only appropriate answer to HIV/AIDS is relentlessly campaigning for people to protect themselves. Anything else is irresponsible and plain stupid.
What you say about Freddie not having been tested is just plain wrong. He was tested twice and he was infected. It does not matter where he was infected and how many sexual partners he had - nobody deserves to die that way and nobody has the right to blame the disease on the victims.
A pity that such rubbish is found on a Queen message board.[/QUOTE]
It is a documented fact that AZT the first publicly available aids drug destroyed peoples immune systems and killed them

how the scars that Freddie had on his legs were not caused by Hiv
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AW4mWEfu5u4&feature=plcp

[QUOTE] [b]inu-liger wrote:[/b]
"A pity that such rubbish is found on a Queen message board."
Of course, one COULD also clean up such rubbish ;)[/QUOTE]
I dont suppose you have listened to the scientists and doctors in the videos.
have you ever taken aids drugs?
do you know anything about what they do to you?
and i dont care if you have given them to someone
for that is not the same as dying from them
or nearly dying from them

Freddie was on AZT
AZT Cause for Concern
British Medical Association Educational Merit Award, 1992 40 minute
Dispatches, Channel 4, 1992
Questions use of AZT and highlights drug toxicity
VIDEO
AZT Cause for Concern
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vq3QnlJqKO8
2
HIV does not cause AIDS. AZT (AIDS medication) causes AIDS
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=phyBEyklySk

Health Education AIDS Liaison, Toronto
AZT and Cancer
New York Native, 1987 October 19th, John Lauritsen
This article is copyright by John Lauritsen. He has given permission to print out this document and to photocopy it. It may not be published commercially without his permission (john_lauritsen@post.harvard.edu). Although this article is several years old, the questions it asks have never been answered, and consequently is still of great importance.
It is urgently necessary to review the toxicity of AZT in light of recent marketing developments. Prior to last August, AZT therapy was officially indicated only for “AIDS”or “ARC”patients who either had “a history of cytologically confirmed Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) or an absolute CD4 (T4 helper/inducer) lymphocyte count of less than 200/mm3 in the peripheral blood before therapy is begun.” (Physician's Desk Reference) This changed dramatically in August, when a series of press releases were issued by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and other branches of the Public Health Service (PHS), claiming that AZT was beneficial for “HIV-infected”persons with “mild symptoms of immune system damage”and also for “HIV- infected persons who have not yet developed symptoms.”
The old rationale for prescribing AZT was that people with AIDS (PWAs) were suffering from a disease that was invariably fatal, that such persons had only a few months to live, and that AZT might extend their lives for a few more months. The idea was that in a desperate situation, drastic measures were called for. I have repeatedly argued that this viewpoint is wrong – that “AIDS”is not invariably fatal; that some PWAs have survived for many years and appear to be recovering; and that the only chance for recovery lies in strengthening the body, rather than injuring it through toxic chemotherapy like AZT.
Instances of severe muscular atrophy and pain caused by AZT were reported in a letter to the New England Journal of Medicine. The physicians observed:
“All patients had an insidious onset of myalgias, muscle tenderness, weakness, and severe muscle atrophy favoring the proximal muscle groups. Physical examinations revealed varying degrees of muscle weakness and grossly apparent atrophy. Weight loss due to muscle loss was uniformly noted; in one patient, the loss was a striking 18 kg. [40 pounds].”
The physicians held AZT responsible for the muscular atrophy and pain:
“We did not observe this illness before zidovudine was available, the disorder was seen in patients taking the drug for extended periods, and the syndrome was ameliorated after the drug was stopped.”[note 12]
A leading British AIDS doctor, Dr. Matthew Helbert, sent Burroughs Wellcome stock into a temporary tailspin when be publicly commented on muscular atrophy and other serious, but not officially acknowledged, side effects of AZT:
“Biting hard on the hand that had paid his air fare, he placed heavy emphasis on new, debilitating and sometimes deadly side-effects of Retrovir on some of his Aids patients. Some men's muscles had degenerated dramatically after long-term use of the drug. Others had rapidly developed a serious brain disease, encephalitis, soon after being taken off the drug. Given the company's duty to keep a new drug under active surveillance, Dr. Helbert asked why the company had not picked up similar cases among the thousands of people treated with Retrovir for a year or more in the United States.”[note 13]
Other well-known, but not officially acknowledged, side effects of AZT include damage to the kidneys, liver, and nerves. An old friend of mine was one of the earlier patients to be put on AZT. Everyone thought he was doing well. For almost a year he was occasionally able to work or go to concerts. Then one day he went into complete paralysis, and he died two days later. Now, paralysis is not an officially recognized side effect of AZT; there is no warning about it on the package. Nevertheless, there is a connection.
Peter Duesberg has repeatedly referred to AZT as a “poison”, and with good reason. AZT is cytotoxic – it kills cells. AZT terminates DNA synthesis, the very life process itself, by which new cells are formed and grow. It is in the very nature of AZT to kill healthy cells. Therefore, damage to the muscles, to the nerves, and to each and every organ of the body should be considered expected consequences of AZT therapy.
http://www.healtoronto.com/azt_cancer.html




So of the 300,000 deaths attributed to AIDS by the CDC since 1987, the vast majority probably died from taking AZT -- from the extreme toxicity of the drug itself, or from an opportunistic disease that resulted from the destruction of the immune system by AZT, or from developing AIDS by taking AZT,...


...especially since the recovery rate of HIV Positives and AIDS patients is so high when they stop taking AZT and other recreational drugs.

"[I]n researching his 1990 book Surviving AIDS, [Michael] Callen interviewed nearly fifty people who had lived for many years not just after being pronounced HIV-positive, but after an AIDS diagnosis. He found that only four had ever used AZT; three of those had since died, and one was dying of AZT-induced lymphoma. But the overwhelming majority of the long-term survivors had somehow managed to resist the enourmous pressure to take AZT."

in one patient, the loss was a striking 18 kg. [40 pounds].”

“We did not observe this illness before zidovudine (AZT FREDDIE'S MEDS) was available, the disorder was seen in patients taking the drug for extended periods, and the syndrome was ameliorated after the drug was stopped.”[note 12]

AZT is cytotoxic – it kills cells.

Didn't treasure moment post about this.... but in a much more coherent manor?

[QUOTE] [b]emrabt wrote:[/b]
Didn't treasure moment post about this.... but in a much more coherent manor?[/QUOTE]
Oh good there is someone who cares about Freddie on this board?

Did you ever get the feeling
That the LIE is less revealing
Than a downright TRUTH?
And did you think ?