Clarification on GB: Queen Archivist

[QUOTE] [b]Arnaldo "Ogre-" Silveira wrote:[/b]

Hey, 871075h!

Welcome to the forum, but beware! AFAIK, somebody could create a very similar username to yours, by simply adding a space either before or after it, like " 871075h" or "871075h ". Other similar spoofs may also occur.

Cheers,

Ogre-[/QUOTE]

Yes, many thanks. That is exactly what happened to me before.

How 'sad' does a person need to be to take up someone else's identity in order to say what they want to say?!

[QUOTE] [b]Montreux wrote:[/b]

Sorry, but... I remember that Greg Brooks' nickname was just "Queen Archivist", not "GB: Queen Archivist" or anything like that...
And - just 21 posts after so many years on the QueenZone.com? I don't believe... It's just someone's stupid game.[/QUOTE]


Oh Jesus!!!!! I give up.

The 21 posts only, is because of the reason I explained in great detail.

Just read it properly!!!

[QUOTE] [b]pittrek wrote:[/b]

I love the fact that you're somehow obsessed with me :-)[/QUOTE]



Totally.

Who wouldn't be? You're such a fascinating, enigmatic and thoroughly compelling character. And your various posts come close to blowing my mind.

[QUOTE] [b]tcc wrote:[/b]

Please post in the right forum. This is not a SERIOUS topic.[/QUOTE]


Get a life mate!!! Who cares!?

Oh fuck, not this shit again. As if Queenzone hadn't already reached its lowest point with kdfuckhead, jeremy kapone and kiss fantards, now we have this boring, attention-seeking shithead back.

[QUOTE] [b]Zebonka12 wrote:[/b]

.....All I'm saying is it doesn't make any sense for you to get sucked into this forum and then complain about the way it operates. Your display name is ultimately meaningless anyway - you mention John Stuart as an example, and he's a good one. When he's posting something relevant or interesting, people love him. When he .

Anyway, I hope this issue hasn't kept you up at night or anything because you seem agitated. There are bigger issues in the world to get anxious over. [/QUOTE]



Of course it doesn't make much sense me coming on QZ and getting up people's noses, but what's that got do with anything. Not much about QZ is actually sensible: it's just a forum for insignificant comment, more orless, no different to any other forum in that regard.

This site is just a bit a fun, sort of, nearly, and nothing at all to take as seriously as many of you do.

It should be VERY obvious by now to everyone here that I say what i do, most times, just to stir things up a bit. You guys do it, and I give back as good as I get. Nothing more or less, and no big deal.

Definitely nothing serious.

I get accused of writing on here in a drunken rant when I say unpopular things. Even though i rarely drink. So what! No big deal! If I took it seriously I'd be on here screaming "How dare you, it's an outrage!" if I cared, if I gave a shit. But i don't, and it's not.

I promise you.... I won't take things personally or seriously, if you don't.

[QUOTE] [b]GB: Queen Archivist wrote:[/b]
This site is just a bit a fun,
[/QUOTE]

It's fun when people (ahem) aren't here sucking the fun out of it.

And...
Who cares

[QUOTE] [b]tomchristie22 wrote:[/b]

[QUOTE] [b]Montreux wrote:[/b]

Sorry, but... I remember that Greg Brooks' nickname was just "Queen Archivist", not "GB: Queen Archivist" or anything like that...
And - just 21 posts after so many years on the QueenZone.com? I don't believe... It's just someone's stupid game.[/QUOTE]

He's made it pretty clear that this is an account he recently opened because he'd forgotten his old login details. [/QUOTE]

Sorry, I didn't read it properly... My mistake. :-)

[QUOTE] [b]Holly2003 wrote:[/b]

Oh fuck, not this shit again. As if Queenzone hadn't already reached its lowest point with kdfuckhead, jeremy kapone and kiss fantards, now we have this boring, attention-seeking shithead back. [/QUOTE]



"attention-seeking shithead"

Says the charmless predictable bore with THREE THOUSAND and SEVEN HUNDRED posts!!!!

You clearly like a bit of attention yourself Holly, from the sheer volume of pointless things you chip in here ALL year round, every year. Your comments are not exactly mind-blowing or profound, are they! But 3,700 of them are attention seeking, whether you realise it or not. Ask a grown-up, I think you'll find you qualify as a 'seeker of QZ attention' too. Did this not occur to you?

[QUOTE] [b]GB: Queen Archivist wrote:[/b]



"attention-seeking shithead"

Says the charmless predictable bore with THREE THOUSAND and SEVEN HUNDRED posts!!!!

You clearly like a bit of attention yourself Holly, from the sheer volume of pointless things you chip in here ALL year round, every year. Your comments are not exactly mind-blowing or profound, are they! But 3,700 of them are attention seeking, whether you realise it or not. Ask a grown-up, I think you'll find you qualify as a 'seeker of QZ attention' too. Did this not occur to you?[/QUOTE]

You're a personality disordered and largely insufferable intrusion. Holly on the other hand could make QZ laugh, make remarkably focused observations and call bullshit on bullshit five times before he fully had his eyes open in the morning. Too bad we don't actually get that much of him as his post count over a decade shows. In the time that I've been here I've certainly never seen him run off on multi paragraph rants of meaningless exasperation and irrelevant and self focused tedium, which is pretty much all I've witnessed from you. You're good for a laugh Greg, but not in the way you think.

lol :)

GB is just a wank unit living off the glory of others.

GB logic: High post count = Constant attention seeking.

When will this bickering cease...honestly... It's a wonder this site has any creativity and motivation left for USEFUL shit anymore these days, really