Thistleboy1980 wrote:
I've heard that the Bootleg Beatles are what it's all about....but I've never actually had a chance to catch one of their shows. Checked a bit out on YouTube: they're ok, but not great....unless that's just the sound quality on YT??
I've seen the Bootleg Beatles, they're pretty good. Some of the songs which were never done live by The Beatles translate kind of awkwardly to the live setting, and their Ringo's singing and accent is pretty appalling, but otherwise they're pretty spot on, especially when replicating the earlier ('66 and earlier) live performances, as they obviously have a lot more to go by. Their accents and style of humour when bantering between songs are all spot on, and their acting is genuine rather than forced and exaggerated. I've never seen the Fab Four (the tribute act), but they look pretty darn good as well, probably better in some respects.
My opinion on the whole Kiss tribute thing is that it's fairly pointless, when considering that (half of) the original band is still playing in a show which is, more or less, paying tribute to their early shows anyway, what with the makeup, costumes, fire breathing, blood spitting, guitar solo with rockets, so on. There's a few of their new songs thrown in for good measure, but they don't exactly dominate the setlist. What they do now is a replication of the sort of thing they did at their peak in 74-77. Might as well see Kiss doing Kiss than some group of no names doing Kiss.
I don't mind Kiss either really. I can understand the criticism for them, but I still enjoy their first four or five albums. Musically, while they weren't changing the world, they were pretty tight.