Queen tour after Miracle/Innuendo

[QUOTE] [b]mooghead wrote:[/b]

[QUOTE] [b]TheWorks84 wrote:[/b]

I would say Somebody to love would of been brought back in to the setlists, as would of Killer Queen.

And no i dont think the Show Must Go On would of been the closer NO WAY!, WWRY AND WATC would of remained the closers.

As for the songs which would of been dropped, most of the Magic album songs, but i think AKOM itself would of remained in the setlist, HTF, break free and gaga would of remained, possible drop Under Pressure.

I would say the newer songs added certainly would of been These are the days of our lives, Show must go on, Miracle, breathru, scandal, and possible Slightly mad.

But u gotta remember some of the Miracle/innuendo songs may not of been written if freddie was not sick.[/QUOTE]

Replace the word 'of' with 'have' and you will sound intelligent enough to make people listen to what you have to say. I know I sound like an arsehole but it's basic English. (Amongst the other atrocities)

[/QUOTE]

You do sound like an arsehole : )

But the question is - is he right ?

On Facebook this morning I saw someone write "to of earned" instead of "to have earned" ...

[QUOTE] [b]TheWorks84 wrote:[/b]
And no i dont think the Show Must Go On would of been the closer NO WAY!, WWRY AND WATC would of remained the closers.
[/QUOTE]
Why not? It's not like the songs are sacred or anything. Honestly, I think it's more of a crime to separate the two than to move them in the setlist, but Queen weren't above going and shoving that stupid Friends Will Be Friends right in between them. I don't think it would be out of the question to move WWRY + WAtC somewhere else, and then just completely boot Friends.

Also, mooghead is kind of right. You could afford to fix some things.

Hmm it must be my national slang, not saying u guys are wrong at all though.

Btw i fixed my earlier post, happy bitches?

It's definitely not specific to people of your language, whatever that may be. It's really ridiculous how many people I see who've always spoken English and still can't make such simple differentiations.

Australian slang that is : ), of is used instead of have in some sentences, it may not be Correct to u people, but many people use it as a slang here.

English speakers everywhere do it , not just in Australia. It happens because "would've" and other similar songs sound like "would of." A lot of people do it, but that doesn't make it right. It's oh so wrong.

[QUOTE] [b]waunakonor wrote:[/b]

English speakers everywhere do it , not just in Australia. It happens because "would've" and other similar songs sound like "would of." A lot of people do it, but that doesn't make it right. It's oh so wrong.[/QUOTE]

I never said it was right..........anyway lets get back to the topic.

i bet if there was a tour after innuendo it would have been called "return of the champions". a bit cheesy imho. but that would have been the thing.

Any English majors here?


I really DO have a serious English question.

Which is preferred:

If it WEREN'T for Freddie's death there may have been another album

Or

If it WASN'T for ...yatta yatta. .


And please explain WHY

It has bothered me before

Visit English language forums

Why would the Show Must Go On become the closer if they'd toured back than. It was played during the last few tours and was never played at the end. WWRY and WATC would seem to be the accepted close ring songs

[QUOTE] [b]TheWorks84 wrote:[/b]

Australian slang that is : ), of is used instead of have in some sentences, it may not be Correct to u people, but many people use it as a slang here.[/QUOTE]

Oh lol, I am Australian. I don't think I'd call it slang here as much as a (frustratingly) common mistake.