brENsKi
edited double post
Thread
Posts in chronological order
brENsKi
[QUOTE] [b]brENsKi wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]GratefulFan wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]Lord Gaga wrote:[/b]
Are you sure you don't want to pad that out to about 17 paragraphs? Because you were actually concise there. Surely you didn't mean to do that.[/QUOTE]
As we've seen in recent weeks it's easy to be brief when you're a bully or a bigot. Brevity can only assist the kind of condescension that depends on connecting with emotion and the worst of human nature. Appeals to reason and fairness however can take both words and time, and to me those principles are worth my efforts. I'm rarely talking to people like you when I type anyway, I'm talking to the people around us that are capable of unpopular perspectives, empathy and thought unburdened by self interested bullshit. [/QUOTE]
for the record:
i have NO connection whatsoever with fantology, or any traders or collectors groups.
i do not know anyone on here outside of this forum, i certainly do not know real wizard , yourself , holly or in fact any contributors to any discussions i have been involved in.
any "bias" you perceive in my posts is purely me calling it how i see it - and you should accept that without typing the kind of bullshit you have above^^^.
when you can prove i am wrong i'll accept that, but as this stands it's opinion vs opinion, nothing more...and that makes mine no less valid than yours.
incidentally - being popular does not equal being correct...it's more than likely that the "unpopular perspectives" you cite could actually be right and YOU could be wrong....who am i kidding? you're fucking infallible and we should all just accept that and move on[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE] [b]GratefulFan wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]Lord Gaga wrote:[/b]
Are you sure you don't want to pad that out to about 17 paragraphs? Because you were actually concise there. Surely you didn't mean to do that.[/QUOTE]
As we've seen in recent weeks it's easy to be brief when you're a bully or a bigot. Brevity can only assist the kind of condescension that depends on connecting with emotion and the worst of human nature. Appeals to reason and fairness however can take both words and time, and to me those principles are worth my efforts. I'm rarely talking to people like you when I type anyway, I'm talking to the people around us that are capable of unpopular perspectives, empathy and thought unburdened by self interested bullshit. [/QUOTE]
for the record:
i have NO connection whatsoever with fantology, or any traders or collectors groups.
i do not know anyone on here outside of this forum, i certainly do not know real wizard , yourself , holly or in fact any contributors to any discussions i have been involved in.
any "bias" you perceive in my posts is purely me calling it how i see it - and you should accept that without typing the kind of bullshit you have above^^^.
when you can prove i am wrong i'll accept that, but as this stands it's opinion vs opinion, nothing more...and that makes mine no less valid than yours.
incidentally - being popular does not equal being correct...it's more than likely that the "unpopular perspectives" you cite could actually be right and YOU could be wrong....who am i kidding? you're fucking infallible and we should all just accept that and move on[/QUOTE]
inu-liger
[QUOTE] [b]Lord Gaga wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]GratefulFan wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]Lord Gaga wrote:[/b]
Inu's not a member of Fanthology.[/QUOTE]
He doesn't have to be. What is it with people and the horrible reasoning?
[/QUOTE]
Holly's argument was that a member of the Fanthology ratted Fuller out and provided a quote from Inu apparently giving himself away as a member of the Fanthology.
Inu is not a member of the Fanthology.
What is it with people and their inability to read?[/QUOTE]
No kidding! I stated very openly, and in some of the biggest threads concerning the DFR/Fanthology fracas, that I was initially invited to participate in the group and was offered a small project to work on as part of the entry requirement. Not sure how Holly2003 missed any of those stated posts, unless he was selectively reading what he wanted to read much like how GF and Panchgani do otherwise.
And I'll state this again for the record but with a little more detail than I previously offered: I was not able to participate in the group due to a lack of time owing to several factors including but not limited to: the Breakthru Atlanta convention (and the show I was playing there), working and prepping for me and my girlfriend's first child, and also very significantly dealing with severe depression and anxiety issues that severely hindered my ability to work on anything outside of my regular job during the last few months of 2011.
In fact, I had a separate side project for JSS not related to Fanthology at all that completely fell by the wayside relating to the latter reasons. Been hoping to resume work on it recently, now that I've gotten some other things out of the way and managed to smooth out some of these issues over time.
Queen fan
[QUOTE] [b]Bohardy wrote:[/b]
Surely if The Game was intended at some point to be a double-album, we'd have heard this story by now?
In all the interviews the band have done since then this has never been mentioned by any of them. The ANATO/ADATR double-album concept has been addressed by Brian a few times, I think, so I find it hard to believe that in 30-odd years he (at least) has never thought to mention that this idea was also considered for The Game.
In conclusion, I still think RUB is a WUM.
[/QUOTE]
I think he is telling the truth (the arthur of the thread)
i can sense it
Surely if The Game was intended at some point to be a double-album, we'd have heard this story by now?
In all the interviews the band have done since then this has never been mentioned by any of them. The ANATO/ADATR double-album concept has been addressed by Brian a few times, I think, so I find it hard to believe that in 30-odd years he (at least) has never thought to mention that this idea was also considered for The Game.
In conclusion, I still think RUB is a WUM.
[/QUOTE]
I think he is telling the truth (the arthur of the thread)
i can sense it
inu-liger
[QUOTE] [b]brENsKi wrote:[/b]
incidentally - being popular does not equal being correct...it's more than likely that the "unpopular perspectives" you cite could actually be right and YOU could be wrong....who am i kidding? you're fucking infallible and we should all just accept that and move on[/QUOTE]
Scary to think that GratefulFan, if I am not mistaken, claimed to be a teacher. I'd hate to see her interactions with students who don't agree with her teaching views...
incidentally - being popular does not equal being correct...it's more than likely that the "unpopular perspectives" you cite could actually be right and YOU could be wrong....who am i kidding? you're fucking infallible and we should all just accept that and move on[/QUOTE]
Scary to think that GratefulFan, if I am not mistaken, claimed to be a teacher. I'd hate to see her interactions with students who don't agree with her teaching views...
Queen fan
[QUOTE] [b]Togg wrote:[/b]
This is without doubt the most interesting topic in years, I remember reading somewhere around the time of The Game being recorded that dozens of tracks were recorded and not used. At the time I was very excited about this but over time I forgot about it.
I have never heard any stories about The Game being a double album but it makes perfect sense from what I can remember at the time.
I have never understood why if they have decent tracks in the bank they have not done more with them, it doesnt make business sense given the desire from the public to hear rare Freddie tracks to hold them back, unless they are truly not up to standard... but people keep saying there are some good ones in there....
Why would QP not wish them released? I get why collectors don't but not the band?
Either way it would seem unlikely they will ever come out now officially, the time has passed and every day the reason to release them gets diluted.
Great topic very interesting [/QUOTE]
It could be because they give the Game away too much, they are too overt.
This is without doubt the most interesting topic in years, I remember reading somewhere around the time of The Game being recorded that dozens of tracks were recorded and not used. At the time I was very excited about this but over time I forgot about it.
I have never heard any stories about The Game being a double album but it makes perfect sense from what I can remember at the time.
I have never understood why if they have decent tracks in the bank they have not done more with them, it doesnt make business sense given the desire from the public to hear rare Freddie tracks to hold them back, unless they are truly not up to standard... but people keep saying there are some good ones in there....
Why would QP not wish them released? I get why collectors don't but not the band?
Either way it would seem unlikely they will ever come out now officially, the time has passed and every day the reason to release them gets diluted.
Great topic very interesting [/QUOTE]
It could be because they give the Game away too much, they are too overt.
dowens
It's been a while since the original poster posted.
John S Stuart
[QUOTE]
[b]dowens wrote: [/b] It's been a while since the original poster posted.[/QUOTE]
That is because he wanted you to believe in a 4 minute Seven Seas of Rhye which did not exist in the first place.
"Look I must be telling you the truth" - as he holds up fake evidence to prove his point.
Gullible's Travels!
[b]dowens wrote: [/b] It's been a while since the original poster posted.[/QUOTE]
That is because he wanted you to believe in a 4 minute Seven Seas of Rhye which did not exist in the first place.
"Look I must be telling you the truth" - as he holds up fake evidence to prove his point.
Gullible's Travels!
Queen fan
[QUOTE] [b]John S Stuart wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE]
[b]dowens wrote: [/b] It's been a while since the original poster posted.[/QUOTE]
That is because he wanted you to believe in a 4 minute Seven Seas of Rhye which did not exist in the first place.
"Look I must be telling you the truth" - as he holds up fake evidence to prove his point.
Gullible's Travels![/QUOTE]
like i said i think he was telling the truth i sense he was
he could not examine the thing on eBay
he only saw the title of it and it concurred with what he already knew. so i would not link him to being untruthful based upon someone selling a faked version of it on eBay
[QUOTE]
[b]dowens wrote: [/b] It's been a while since the original poster posted.[/QUOTE]
That is because he wanted you to believe in a 4 minute Seven Seas of Rhye which did not exist in the first place.
"Look I must be telling you the truth" - as he holds up fake evidence to prove his point.
Gullible's Travels![/QUOTE]
like i said i think he was telling the truth i sense he was
he could not examine the thing on eBay
he only saw the title of it and it concurred with what he already knew. so i would not link him to being untruthful based upon someone selling a faked version of it on eBay
tcc
[QUOTE] [b]GratefulFan wrote:[/b]
http://rendezvous.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/05/10/in-brussels-private-art-collections-with-open-doors/
“It was selfish at first, I wanted a space where I could see my collection, for me and my friends,” he said. But he decided that the art should be shared. After extensive renovations, the building opened as a public art space in 2007.
Classy![/QUOTE]
Sharing of a painting or sculpture is different from sharing music.
A viewer cannot replicate the painting or sculpture whereas music can be downloaded and many copies can be made. Worse still, the people who copy the music can pass on to other people as though he was the original uploader.
http://rendezvous.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/05/10/in-brussels-private-art-collections-with-open-doors/
“It was selfish at first, I wanted a space where I could see my collection, for me and my friends,” he said. But he decided that the art should be shared. After extensive renovations, the building opened as a public art space in 2007.
Classy![/QUOTE]
Sharing of a painting or sculpture is different from sharing music.
A viewer cannot replicate the painting or sculpture whereas music can be downloaded and many copies can be made. Worse still, the people who copy the music can pass on to other people as though he was the original uploader.
Queen fan
[QUOTE] [b]tcc wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]GratefulFan wrote:[/b]
http://rendezvous.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/05/10/in-brussels-private-art-collections-with-open-doors/
“It was selfish at first, I wanted a space where I could see my collection, for me and my friends,” he said. But he decided that the art should be shared. After extensive renovations, the building opened as a public art space in 2007.
Classy![/QUOTE]
nowthere are 3d printers and scanners so that will no longer be true
Sharing of a painting or sculpture is different from sharing music.
A viewer cannot replicate the painting or sculpture whereas music can be downloaded and many copies can be made. Worse still, the people who copy the music can pass on to other people as though he was the original uploader.
[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE] [b]GratefulFan wrote:[/b]
http://rendezvous.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/05/10/in-brussels-private-art-collections-with-open-doors/
“It was selfish at first, I wanted a space where I could see my collection, for me and my friends,” he said. But he decided that the art should be shared. After extensive renovations, the building opened as a public art space in 2007.
Classy![/QUOTE]
nowthere are 3d printers and scanners so that will no longer be true
Sharing of a painting or sculpture is different from sharing music.
A viewer cannot replicate the painting or sculpture whereas music can be downloaded and many copies can be made. Worse still, the people who copy the music can pass on to other people as though he was the original uploader.
[/QUOTE]
Queen fan
and the technology to 3d scan will soon be inside a hand held device like a phone
so someone could just walk around a sculpture and get its 3d dimensions load the info into their 3d scan machine and out pops a full sized replica
same goes for pantings, they could scan the exact surface and pigmentation types and then go home and out of their machine pops a old master.
so someone could just walk around a sculpture and get its 3d dimensions load the info into their 3d scan machine and out pops a full sized replica
same goes for pantings, they could scan the exact surface and pigmentation types and then go home and out of their machine pops a old master.
waunakonor
I like how blame for this particular shit-storm is being tossed around everywhere even though most of the responsibility falls on the shoulders of The Real Wizard and myself.
Anyway, I would like to order one copy of Deep Ridge, please.
Thank you.
Anyway, I would like to order one copy of Deep Ridge, please.
Thank you.
The Real Wizard
[QUOTE] [b]Lord Gaga wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]GratefulFan wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]Lord Gaga wrote:[/b]
Inu's not a member of Fanthology.[/QUOTE]
He doesn't have to be. What is it with people and the horrible reasoning?
[/QUOTE]
Holly's argument was that a member of the Fanthology ratted Fuller out and provided a quote from Inu apparently giving himself away as a member of the Fanthology.
Inu is not a member of the Fanthology.
What is it with people and their inability to read?[/QUOTE]
Finally, some common sense by page 9. Thank you.
More of this please. Back to the subject at hand now.
[QUOTE] [b]GratefulFan wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]Lord Gaga wrote:[/b]
Inu's not a member of Fanthology.[/QUOTE]
He doesn't have to be. What is it with people and the horrible reasoning?
[/QUOTE]
Holly's argument was that a member of the Fanthology ratted Fuller out and provided a quote from Inu apparently giving himself away as a member of the Fanthology.
Inu is not a member of the Fanthology.
What is it with people and their inability to read?[/QUOTE]
Finally, some common sense by page 9. Thank you.
More of this please. Back to the subject at hand now.
Holly2003
[QUOTE]
[b]The Real Wizard wrote: [/b] [QUOTE] [b]Lord Gaga wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]GratefulFan wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]Lord Gaga wrote:[/b]
Inu's not a member of Fanthology.[/QUOTE]
He doesn't have to be. What is it with people and the horrible reasoning?
[/QUOTE]
Holly's argument was that a member of the Fanthology ratted Fuller out and provided a quote from Inu apparently giving himself away as a member of the Fanthology.
Inu is not a member of the Fanthology.
What is it with people and their inability to read?[/QUOTE]
Finally, some common sense by page 9. Thank you.
More of this please. Back to the subject at hand now.[/QUOTE]
Or, as you were the one who originally took us away from the subject at hand, why don't you shut your pie hole and let people talk about whatever they want, without you trying to steer the conversation along routes you want it to take.
[b]The Real Wizard wrote: [/b] [QUOTE] [b]Lord Gaga wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]GratefulFan wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]Lord Gaga wrote:[/b]
Inu's not a member of Fanthology.[/QUOTE]
He doesn't have to be. What is it with people and the horrible reasoning?
[/QUOTE]
Holly's argument was that a member of the Fanthology ratted Fuller out and provided a quote from Inu apparently giving himself away as a member of the Fanthology.
Inu is not a member of the Fanthology.
What is it with people and their inability to read?[/QUOTE]
Finally, some common sense by page 9. Thank you.
More of this please. Back to the subject at hand now.[/QUOTE]
Or, as you were the one who originally took us away from the subject at hand, why don't you shut your pie hole and let people talk about whatever they want, without you trying to steer the conversation along routes you want it to take.