I just read this article:
http://www.express.co.uk/news/showbiz/457958/It-feels-like-it-was-yesterday-Brian-May-on-releasing-previously-unheard-Queen-tracks
In it Brian says: "When I hear Freddie's voice coming off the recording, it's 35 years ago but it feels as if it was yesterday, and he's full of beans and naughtiness. It's a joy."
I mean, "The works" was 30 years ago, so maybe Brian had been working on a track by the Game sessions (35 years ago)?
We will find out later this year, but until then it´s good to speculate about everything they say or write:-)
Thread
Posts in chronological order
He could be talking about two different tracks.
Mr.QueenFan wrote:
I just read this article:
http://www.express.co.uk/news/showbiz/457958/It-feels-like-it-was-yesterday-Brian-May-on-releasing-previously-unheard-Queen-tracks
In it Brian says: "When I hear Freddie's voice coming off the recording, it's 35 years ago but it feels as if it was yesterday, and he's full of beans and naughtiness. It's a joy."
I mean, "The works" was 30 years ago, so maybe Brian had been working on a track by the Game sessions (35 years ago)?
We will find out later this year, but until then it´s good to speculate about everything they say or write:-)
35 years ago is 1979. June-July The Game sessions.
It's really awful that I should have to point this out, but no amount of stupidity can surprise me from rocknrolllover...when someone says "35 years", they are using a rounded number, which means that it was ROUGHLY 35 years ago. It could be '79. It could be '78. It could be '82.
thomasquinn 32989 wrote:
It's really awful that I should have to point this out, but no amount of stupidity can surprise me from rocknrolllover...when someone says "35 years", they are using a rounded number, which means that it was ROUGHLY 35 years ago. It could be '79. It could be '78. It could be '82.
You didn't recognize the flaming autism in his previous posts?
Perhaps it was a figure used to throw us off the scent completely?
Stick wrote:
thomasquinn 32989 wrote:
It's really awful that I should have to point this out, but no amount of stupidity can surprise me from rocknrolllover...when someone says "35 years", they are using a rounded number, which means that it was ROUGHLY 35 years ago. It could be '79. It could be '78. It could be '82.
You didn't recognize the flaming autism in his previous posts?
What are you talking about, stick?
thomasquinn 32989 wrote:
It's really awful that I should have to point this out, but no amount of stupidity can surprise me from rocknrolllover...when someone says "35 years", they are using a rounded number, which means that it was ROUGHLY 35 years ago. It could be '79. It could be '78. It could be '82.
if you don't understand the meaning of the word "Assumption" is your personal problems.
if you're implying that I'm stupid, moron, and a Troll. I assure you I am more than you could imagine, although you do not think.
Lostman wrote:
He could be talking about two different tracks.
Yes, that is what i mean, sorry if i wasn´t too precise.
We already know that he worked on a track by "The works" sessions or so, but reading this i got the impression that one of the tracks was late 70´s early 80´s. We know that there are at least 3 new unheard songs, and 35 years to me sounds more like a song from "The Game"or even "Hot Space" than from "The works", witch can imply that Brian had been working on two different songs at he same time.
Of course i´m aware that 35 can mean 36 or 33, but in this case i´m taking the liberty to believe that it´s not from "The Works" sessions, that was more my point that it being from "The Game" sessions. But it gave a great title for my topic:-)
Mr.QueenFan wrote:
Lostman wrote:
He could be talking about two different tracks.
Yes, that is what i mean, sorry if i wasn´t too precise.
We already know that he worked on a track by "The works" sessions or so, but reading this i got the impression that one of the tracks was late 70´s early 80´s. We know that there are at least 3 new unheard songs, and 35 years to me sounds more like a song from "The Game"or even "Hot Space" than from "The works", witch can imply that Brian had been working on two different songs at he same time.
Of course i´m aware that 35 can mean 36 or 33, but in this case i´m taking the liberty to believe that it´s not from "The Works" sessions, that was more my point that it being from "The Game" sessions. But it gave a great title for my topic:-)
My thoughts exactly.
I once heard that they recorded a bunch of songs during the The Game sessions. This rumour might have turned out false sometime later though, I just don't remember. But they certainly do have more tracks than we can even imagine!
To have them all released would just be a luxury, but it's only just a dream! However, knowing that at least something is going to be given the right treatment, it warms me up a bit.
rocknrolllover wrote:thomasquinn 32989 wrote:
It's really awful that I should have to point this out, but no amount of stupidity can surprise me from rocknrolllover...when someone says "35 years", they are using a rounded number, which means that it was ROUGHLY 35 years ago. It could be '79. It could be '78. It could be '82.
if you don't understand the meaning of the word "Assumption" is your personal problems.
if you're implying that I'm stupid, moron, and a Troll. I assure you I am more than you could imagine, although you do not think.
MORE than we could IMAGINE ????? is that possible?
by all accounts that would make you VERY STUPID, a HUGE MORON and a MASSIVE TROLL.
Ok you said it. So we're forced to accept ALL of the above.
brENsKi wrote:
rocknrolllover wrote:thomasquinn 32989 wrote:
It's really awful that I should have to point this out, but no amount of stupidity can surprise me from rocknrolllover...when someone says "35 years", they are using a rounded number, which means that it was ROUGHLY 35 years ago. It could be '79. It could be '78. It could be '82.
if you don't understand the meaning of the word "Assumption" is your personal problems.
if you're implying that I'm stupid, moron, and a Troll. I assure you I am more than you could imagine, although you do not think.
MORE than we could IMAGINE ????? is that possible?
by all accounts that would make you VERY STUPID, a HUGE MORON and a MASSIVE TROLL.
Ok you said it. So we're forced to accept ALL of the above.
Lol! All that you're saying is outright bullshit!
I am not a troll, I am not a moron an I am not a massive troll.
If I am a troll and you are a troll too. Yes yes, you are a troll.
rocknrolllover wrote:
Lol! All that you're saying is outright bullshit!
I am not a troll, I am not a moron an I am not a massive troll.
If I am a troll and you are a troll too. Yes yes, you are a troll.
Flaming autism.
Nothing more, nothing less.
Stick wrote:
rocknrolllover wrote:
Lol! All that you're saying is outright bullshit!
I am not a troll, I am not a moron an I am not a massive troll.
If I am a troll and you are a troll too. Yes yes, you are a troll.
Flaming autism.
Nothing more, nothing less.
Please stop stink and trolling
thomasquinn 32989 wrote:
It's really awful that I should have to point this out, but no amount of stupidity can surprise me from rocknrolllover...when someone says "35 years", they are using a rounded number, which means that it was ROUGHLY 35 years ago. It could be '79. It could be '78. It could be '82.
You may be right, Thomas, but I don't really agree with those thoughts - when I say something was 20 years ago, I mean it was 20 years ago. If I'm not sure, or estimating, I'd say "roughly 20 years ago". Perhaps Brian said 35 years because he knows it was 35 years? If so, then it would place it in "The Game" era. It may just be an estimation - only Brian knows, as he'll have the recording dates in front of him.