So if the tour goes well Bri & Rog say they may record with Glambert, so what do we think ? I'm undecided, if its a full on Queen album , harmonies, layered guitar, a proper Queen album unlike cosmos rocks, it may work, if they defer to Glambert and compromise as they did with Paul Rodgers, then it will be deadly !
Thread
Posts in chronological order
Shit storm in 321....
Whatever they choose to do is really up to them. If the material itself is above par of what they achieved on The Cosmos Rocks (which I feel in hindsight suffered from Brian's academic distractions), then I say go for it. Would help pour water on the arguments that Adam is not capable of being an 'originals' artist instead of a 'karaoke singer' - an argument which by the way, was similar to the dung heaped on Paul Rodgers in the beginning of Q+PR when people also accused him of becoming a karaoke singer with a live backing band!
But at least wait until the new album of Freddie material is finished! Last thing we need again is another tangential distraction.
But at least wait until the new album of Freddie material is finished! Last thing we need again is another tangential distraction.
Perhaps the album will include AL and FM vocals......
ANAGRAMER wrote:
Perhaps the album will include AL and FM vocals......
It will be a nightmare for the loyal fans as me.
No need to mix Freddie with this arsehole who is called Glambert!
Almost universally Bri and Rog do good material, and some of it better than good. I wouldn't be upset if Adam were an enabler for that. But I agree it should be a separate enterprise from the FM (+MJ) tracks, ideally.
ANAGRAMER wrote: Perhaps the album will include AL and FM vocals......
oh good god no. not for me
but, you can understand why they might do it - FM sells, AL sells (in USA) = winning formula
Even a good manager will not come in a head to release the album with two soloists, one of which is fucking gay!
rocknrolllover wrote: Even a good manager will not come in a head to release the album with two soloists, one of which is fucking gay!
time for a ban ^^^^ surely?
Let's have the Queen album first, Queen+AL later, or am I being greedy ?
I think that Cosmos Rocks flop on the charts has been a good lesson for them so no need to release another album with a guest vocalist...
brENsKi wrote:
rocknrolllover wrote: Even a good manager will not come in a head to release the album with two soloists, one of which is fucking gay!
time for a ban ^^^^ surely?
No, it's not a time
rocknrolllover wrote:
Even a good manager will not come in a head to release the album with two soloists, one of which is fucking gay!
Yeah. Last thing we need is ANOTHER fucking gay fronting Queen....
Arse.
Raffy wrote:
I think that Cosmos Rocks flop on the charts has been a good lesson for them so no need to release another album with a guest vocalist...
Nope. Cosmos Rocks was a cracking album.
I'm all up for another if it's the only way we get new material.
Of course, as someone pointed out though, let's not have it distract from the 'proper' Queen album they are working on (which better not contain Michael Bloody Jackson)
If they are all really into "it" then they should do it. If there are any doubts or just a lacklustre attitude inside their minds - please drop that idea of making a record with him or any other singer.
@rocknrolllover...really it`s time to ban YOU !
@rocknrolllover...really it`s time to ban YOU !