Skip to content
Queen crest Queenzone.org

Adam Lambert (music, tv, videos, collaborations)

430 posts Page 26 of 29
Thread

Posts in chronological order

Search forum
T
taptap · Member since


Bullet with Butterfly Wings wrote:
taptap wrote:



Bullet with Butterfly Wings wrote:
Hey girl, unless you are an alias on QOL, no one has ran away from me. You are just bitter than your own posts before you left meant the end for mithril. Awww.


I never left there, and gurl, you are definitely considered a troll (at best) by most of the people there.  E and CRD don't try to hide it, and neither do several others.  Oh well, ignorance is bliss I suppose.  But remember you owe a PM to CRD - he's waiting.


My God at the lengths you sink too in trying to defend things.
No? You didn't leave? Why no posts after your threats and cursing me out via PM? Funny that eh....
(clipped because no one got time for all that cray)



Srsly?  Srsly?!  I said I lurk on QOL and post here, because Lambert fans aren't welcome at QOL.  Lurking = not posting.  Duh.  And I said I've never read comments at Amazon (srsly, who does that?!), so there's no way I can cover up comments if I haven't read them, and I'm not sure how one covers up comments on an online forum even if one is reading them. 

P.S.
I have no idea what you mean by 'lengths gone to try and defend things'.  I'm not defending anything because I have nothing to defend.  I'm a QAL fan - no defending needed.  I think you're cray - no defending needed.  Srsly, words have meaning.  Read slowly and parse them out.  Here's a few to start with: 'Lurking', 'I don't go there' (yes it's a sentence, but it's a simple one, with just four small words, although one is a contraction, so I guess that's five), and 'defend'.  There will be a test as I'm sure all of these words will once again form the heart of your cray ramblings again in no time flat.
T
taptap · Member since


Bullet with Butterfly Wings wrote:
taptap wrote:

I never left there, and gurl, you are definitely considered a troll (at best) by most of the people there.  E and CRD don't try to hide it, and neither do several others.  Oh well, ignorance is bliss I suppose.  But remember you owe a PM to CRD - he's waiting.


Searching my posts is oh so hard, eh? Well, at least you might not be able to copy/keep/threaten to forward them onto a legal commission here LOL. Do try before you spout off about me not talking about Freddie here, this good enough...
http://www.queenzone.com/forums/1383728/alfie-boe-freddie-mercury-saved-my-life-documentary.aspx?page=2

taptap wrote:  
The thread you linked has two pages, and on those two pages you have a grand total of one post, and in that post you thanked someone else for their post about Freddie Mercury.  That's it.  You didn't say a thing about him yourself, you didn't add to the discussion at all.  You didn't discuss Queen or music - at all.  If thanking someone for a post is your idea of posting about Queen, Freddie, and music, then I don't know what to say.

Now I really don't care if that's how you want to post.  But when you ramble on about Lambert fans not posting about the entities Queen and/or Lambert or music in a QAL sub-forum, I'd say you haven't got a leg to stand on.  Especially when, as shown above, you give SC flack for posting a video of Adam.  You may not like him, but he is definitely an element of QAL (he's the AL part, see?).

So take a position and stick to it.  Is SC fine in posting AL stuff in the QAL sub-forum?  Or do you think she's not posting enough AL stuff?  Would you prefer to see other things?  Should we all start limiting our posts to thanking others for their thoughts without adding anything new or original of our own?  Really, pick a position and stick with it, because this rambling from one side to the other makes you either hypocritical or cray (I think it's both, tbf).

T
taptap · Member since


SweetCaroline wrote: taptap, I've been wanting to ask you why icy insists on calling you "mithril." I remember such a person from the QOL site but she hasn't posted there in a long time.


We're just encouraging her cray, obviously.  But now I'm hungry for pudding!

(As it turns out I made a bread pudding with brandy-soaked raisins and brandy sauce yesterday, so I'm in luck.)
I
Iron Butterfly · Member since
taptap wrote:



Bullet with Butterfly Wings wrote:
taptap wrote:



Bullet with Butterfly Wings wrote:
Hey girl, unless you are an alias on QOL, no one has ran away from me. You are just bitter than your own posts before you left meant the end for mithril. Awww.


I never left there, and gurl, you are definitely considered a troll (at best) by most of the people there.  E and CRD don't try to hide it, and neither do several others.  Oh well, ignorance is bliss I suppose.  But remember you owe a PM to CRD - he's waiting.


My God at the lengths you sink too in trying to defend things.
No? You didn't leave? Why no posts after your threats and cursing me out via PM? Funny that eh....
(clipped because no one got time for all that cray)



Srsly?  Srsly?!  I said I lurk on QOL and post here, because Lambert fans aren't welcome at QOL.  Lurking = not posting.  Duh.  And I said I've never read comments at Amazon (srsly, who does that?!), so there's no way I can cover up comments if I haven't read them, and I'm not sure how one covers up comments on an online forum even if one is reading them. 

P.S.
I have no idea what you mean by 'lengths gone to try and defend things'.  I'm not defending anything because I have nothing to defend.  I'm a QAL fan - no defending needed.  I think you're cray - no defending needed.  Srsly, words have meaning.  Read slowly and parse them out.  Here's a few to start with: 'Lurking', 'I don't go there' (yes it's a sentence, but it's a simple one, with just four small words, although one is a contraction, so I guess that's five), and 'defend'.  There will be a test as I'm sure all of these words will once again form the heart of your cray ramblings again in no time flat.

The shit from your mind to your fingers. AL fans are welcome at QOL. Spamming isn't.
Did you not realise yet that SC reads and posts on Amazon? That's who does that and many more people besides. LOL. For the record, I don't post on Amazon.
You still dodge. Must be a Glambert tactic as well as threatening to get the law involved. LOL.
Lurking do you? Good! Then you must realise how wrong you are that no one talks with me. LOL.
Wrong you are about so many things. LMAO at your defense/dodges/being plain wrong.

I
Iron Butterfly · Member since
taptap wrote:



SweetCaroline wrote: taptap, I've been wanting to ask you why icy insists on calling you "mithril." I remember such a person from the QOL site but she hasn't posted there in a long time.


We're just encouraging her cray, obviously.  But now I'm hungry for pudding!

(As it turns out I made a bread pudding with brandy-soaked raisins and brandy sauce yesterday, so I'm in luck.)

See, you can't answer. All that booze from a few weeks ago must be catching up with you.
T
taptap · Member since


Bullet with Butterfly Wings wrote:
taptap wrote:



SweetCaroline wrote: taptap, I've been wanting to ask you why icy insists on calling you "mithril." I remember such a person from the QOL site but she hasn't posted there in a long time.


We're just encouraging her cray, obviously.  But now I'm hungry for pudding!

(As it turns out I made a bread pudding with brandy-soaked raisins and brandy sauce yesterday, so I'm in luck.)

See, you can't answer. All that booze from a few weeks ago must be catching up with you.


I answered this the first time you brought it up, but as usual you either didn't understand the words or ignored them.  You may have no problem saying the same thing over and over and over again, but I'm certainly not going to do the same and look as cray as you.  Call me mithril, call me taptap, talk about legislative boards or whatever, it's all fine with me because it's all on you.
T
taptap · Member since


Bullet with Butterfly Wings wrote:
taptap wrote:



Bullet with Butterfly Wings wrote:
taptap wrote:



Bullet with Butterfly Wings wrote:
Hey girl, unless you are an alias on QOL, no one has ran away from me. You are just bitter than your own posts before you left meant the end for mithril. Awww.


I never left there, and gurl, you are definitely considered a troll (at best) by most of the people there.  E and CRD don't try to hide it, and neither do several others.  Oh well, ignorance is bliss I suppose.  But remember you owe a PM to CRD - he's waiting.


My God at the lengths you sink too in trying to defend things.
No? You didn't leave? Why no posts after your threats and cursing me out via PM? Funny that eh....
(clipped because no one got time for all that cray)



Srsly?  Srsly?!  I said I lurk on QOL and post here, because Lambert fans aren't welcome at QOL.  Lurking = not posting.  Duh.  And I said I've never read comments at Amazon (srsly, who does that?!), so there's no way I can cover up comments if I haven't read them, and I'm not sure how one covers up comments on an online forum even if one is reading them. 

P.S.
I have no idea what you mean by 'lengths gone to try and defend things'.  I'm not defending anything because I have nothing to defend.  I'm a QAL fan - no defending needed.  I think you're cray - no defending needed.  Srsly, words have meaning.  Read slowly and parse them out.  Here's a few to start with: 'Lurking', 'I don't go there' (yes it's a sentence, but it's a simple one, with just four small words, although one is a contraction, so I guess that's five), and 'defend'.  There will be a test as I'm sure all of these words will once again form the heart of your cray ramblings again in no time flat.

The shit from your mind to your fingers. AL fans are welcome at QOL. Spamming isn't.
Did you not realise yet that SC reads and posts on Amazon? That's who does that and many more people besides. LOL. For the record, I don't post on Amazon.
You still dodge. Must be a Glambert tactic as well as threatening to get the law involved. LOL.
Lurking do you? Good! Then you must realise how wrong you are that no one talks with me. LOL.
Wrong you are about so many things. LMAO at your defense/dodges/being plain wrong.



Here's another word for you to look up: spamming.  I don't think it means what you think it means.  Let me give you two examples:

1. SC posting videos, tour stats, and music from previous Queen, AL, and QAL events - not spamming.
2. Icy posting replies to SC bitching about the videos, tour stats and music from previous Queen, AL, and QAL events - spamming.

It's really not hard to understand the difference.  In the first case the topic is Queen, AL, or QAL.  In the second case the topic is SC.  Get on topic, icy.
I
Iron Butterfly · Member since
taptap wrote:



Bullet with Butterfly Wings wrote:
taptap wrote:



SweetCaroline wrote: taptap, I've been wanting to ask you why icy insists on calling you "mithril." I remember such a person from the QOL site but she hasn't posted there in a long time.


We're just encouraging her cray, obviously.  But now I'm hungry for pudding!

(As it turns out I made a bread pudding with brandy-soaked raisins and brandy sauce yesterday, so I'm in luck.)

See, you can't answer. All that booze from a few weeks ago must be catching up with you.


I answered this the first time you brought it up, but as usual you either didn't understand the words or ignored them.  You may have no problem with saying the same thing over and over and over again, but I'm certainly not going to do the same and look as cray as you.  Call me mithril, call me taptap, talk about legislative boards or whatever, it's all fine with me because it's all on you.

Hate to break it to you gurl, you already look cray. Those threats you made on QOL were proof of that. And oh poor you, couldn't do it all by yourself so you as always want/need more to get involved. Here you are hoping to do what now by bringing up other people from another board. You really can't help yourself in the crap you spout.
I call that cray and sad.
As for spamming, yes, it has been done plenty of times on QOL. Post a pic of AL with Glee cast members in an Elton John thread...just because the pic was taken at an EJ party. Post a video of the Ukraine concerts when all hell was breaking loose, and many were concerned about a fellow posters safety. That is just 2 of what SC has done over there...not to mention her wondering what a winking AL gif was thinking. LOL.
T
taptap · Member since


Bullet with Butterfly Wings wrote:
...not to mention her wondering what a winking AL gif was thinking. LOL. 


OMG, NOT A WINKING AL GIF??11?1?  NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

P.S.
You're looking crayer than ever.  I think you've officially crossed over into the paranoid, delusional, conspiracy theorist sub-group at QOL (that makes two of you, btw).
T
taptap · Member since


Bullet with Butterfly Wings wrote:
...As for spamming, yes, it has been done plenty of times on QOL. Post a pic of AL with Glee cast members in an Elton John thread...just because the pic was taken at an EJ party. Post a video of the Ukraine concerts when all hell was breaking loose, and many were concerned about a fellow posters safety. That is just 2 of what SC has done over there...not to mention her wondering what a winking AL gif was thinking. LOL. 


taptap wrote:

Are you kidding me?

1) Picture of Elton John and others, at a party given by Elton John, is definitely not spamming in an Elton John thread, no matter how much you dislike the people EJ invited to his party and who are in the pics.  Here's a bunch of them from his 20th annual AIDS foundation event:

http://www.zimbio.com/photos/Adam+Lambert/Elton+John

2) Pictures of Independence square in Kiev, comparing how it looked during the QAL concert just months before, and how it looked after the uprising, is completely legitimate in the QAL thread, no matter how much you wished to make it about the posters (the thread topic never was about the posters you ninny).  Here's a bunch of those before (QAL) and after pics:

http://rockimitatesart.wordpress.com/2012/07/01/adam-lambert-performs-with-queen-in-kiev-ukraine-06-30-12/

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/shots-show-devastation-kiev-independence-square-gallery-1.1621283

3) A gif of AL is not spamming in a QAL thread, whether he's winking or not.  That's like saying we can't post pics or gifs or vids of Freddie in the General Queen sub-forum (or even the Serious Queen sub-forum, based on what I've seen there).   Look for it yourself - you keep such close tabs on SC and her posts I'm sure you know right where it is.

All of these things are legitimate, and hence not spam.  Clearly your definition of spam is 'stuff icy does not like and/or approve of'.  This is not the textbook definition of spam, it's the cray icy definition of spam.
I
Iron Butterfly · Member since
taptap wrote:



Bullet with Butterfly Wings wrote:
...not to mention her wondering what a winking AL gif was thinking. LOL. 


OMG, NOT A WINKING AL GIF??11?1?  NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

P.S.
You're looking crayer than ever.  I think you've officially crossed over into the paranoid, delusional, conspiracy theorist sub-group at QOL (that makes two of you, btw).


No, dear that is you to a T. You don't even seem to realise what you are saying. Who reads at Amazon...many people, your BBF called SC does. Did you check where I posted about Freddie? Even though you said I never did post about him here here. Do you see people reply to me on QOL, since you say you "lurk"? I lurked here before I decided to join again. Inu is one of the people who knows I've read on and off here for years now.
How about when you and SC joined QOL. You came in mouthing off, she came in accusing people of being others, wow that's never changed much.
WTF is it with you trying to get people on your side? Your thinking someone is here when he isn't?
You really are so wrong, just a pity you resort to lies/dodging in trying to make your points. You showed your true colors before you left QOL. You didn't get your way, so basically you threw one of the biggest hissy fits I've seen there.
The pic SC posted in the Elton John thread, did not even include EJ. It was AL with a few others from Glee at a EJ party.
The video of the concert was posted in the VOTW thread about the Ukraine , not the Q+AL thread or even anything related to music.
The winking gif was posted in the watching/listening to thread. Because SC could no longer spam other threads about her AL. Never in all my time have I read anyone ponder what a winking gif was thinking, before SC that is.
Do get your facts straight, I mean since you lurk and all.
Get a clue, or get your facts straight. You get so many things wrong in your "defense". HaHa!


I
Iron Butterfly · Member since
taptap wrote:



Bullet with Butterfly Wings wrote:
...As for spamming, yes, it has been done plenty of times on QOL. Post a pic of AL with Glee cast members in an Elton John thread...just because the pic was taken at an EJ party. Post a video of the Ukraine concerts when all hell was breaking loose, and many were concerned about a fellow posters safety. That is just 2 of what SC has done over there...not to mention her wondering what a winking AL gif was thinking. LOL. 


taptap wrote:

Are you kidding me?

1) Picture of Elton John and others, at a party given by Elton John, is definitely not spamming in an Elton John thread, no matter how much you dislike the people EJ invited to his party and who are in the pics.  Here's a bunch of them from his 20th annual AIDS foundation event:

http://www.zimbio.com/photos/Adam+Lambert/Elton+John

2) Pictures of Independence square in Kiev, comparing how it looked during the QAL concert just months before, and how it looked after the uprising, is completely legitimate in the QAL thread, no matter how much you wished to make it about the posters (the thread topic never was about the posters you ninny).  Here's a bunch of those before (QAL) and after pics:

http://rockimitatesart.wordpress.com/2012/07/01/adam-lambert-performs-with-queen-in-kiev-ukraine-06-30-12/

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/shots-show-devastation-kiev-independence-square-gallery-1.1621283

3) A gif of AL is not spamming in a QAL thread, whether he's winking or not.  That's like saying we can't post pics or gifs or vids of Freddie in the General Queen sub-forum (or even the Serious Queen sub-forum, based on what I've seen there).   Look for it yourself - you keep such close tabs on SC and her posts I'm sure you know right where it is.

All of these things are legitimate, and hence not spam.  Clearly your definition of spam is 'stuff icy does not like and/or approve of'.  This is not the textbook definition of spam, it's the cray icy definition of spam.


Wrong. HaHa!
I
Iron Butterfly · Member since
Hmm. No bitchy comeback LOL. Losing your touch taptap. Being proved wrong and getting caught in your own untruths is such a bitch,
T
taptap · Member since


Bullet with Butterfly Wings wrote: Hmm. No bitchy comeback LOL. Losing your touch taptap. Being proved wrong and getting caught in your own untruths is such a bitch,


Nope.  No point in talking with a witless wonder - it's too exhausting except for short periods.  I'm taking Capt. Den Ronson's excellent advice just to watch you flail a bit.  That's entertaining, too, and nowhere near as exhausting.