Sorry, I get confused with the 70's concert, who also have only professionaly recorded WWRY. Coincidences.
Doga · Member since
That show in Berlin seems filmed for the news or for some music program, that means only the first songs and maybe the last ones too, filmed with one camera only, two or three with luck, there are example of this during all the Queen career.
Berlin 78 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kSYjSXUgKd0
Madrid 79 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ndmdE4-CT8
Milano 84 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OdZMAwg4-ok
To name a few. See?, just one or two angles and usually bits of songs. Remember these journalist aren't fans, just workers doing their job in the most accurate way possible, so no more footage filmed than the necessary and only the first songs if possible to return soon at home, of course there are exceptions, but this is the rule. Film or record a concert for a professional release have much more work than that, a camera crew with at least 8 angles, months of post production for audio and video, overdubbing.... You can mix the video with few angles and add the untouched audio in a couple of days, like the stone cold crazy or the wwry bits, but the product is far from the one of a good DVD/Bluray of a concert.
So they will probably choose one location, (still thinking in Las Vegas or New York, definitely not Chicago) hire a film crew, i hope one over the top like Serpent Productions, and they will film and record there the live album of this tour. They will have in the archives the video feed and the unpolished audio of all the gigs, but probably only one or two will be recorded to be released. The perfect example of this is Wembley 86, the first night wasn't intended to be released so they only have the video feed of the giant screen, while the second night was intended to be released and they have extra angles and all the tapes of all cameras. Same with Knebworthk, they never wanted to release the video so they didn't preserve the video feed, just the audio for Live Magic.
