Lets get something straight here, other people on this thread have also stated they found Adam Lambert awful on xfactor
and have you bombarded them with your posts?
Secondly Queens gig at The Metro Arena Newcastle is selling slowly and when you think Kate bush sold her tour out in minutes then you can see
a lot of people are wary about madam lambert.
yes i have expressed my opinions on here about lambert, and everyone is not going to like him.
If Lambert was as popular as the hype then Queens gig would have sold out instantly.
I do give donations to the mercury phoenix trust, because Freddie was worth so much more than the idiots on here who say Lambert
is as good as freddie, what a stupid thing to say.
Freddie was voted the greatest rock singer ever, and he will always be untouchable for performance, vocal range and power on stage.
Lambert is nothing in comparison.
I do give donations to the mercury phoenix trust, because Freddie was worth so much more than the idiots on here who say Lambert
is as good as freddie, what a stupid thing to say.
Freddie was voted the greatest rock singer ever, and he will always be untouchable for performance, vocal range and power on stage.
Lambert is nothing in comparison.
Very few if any here are saying Adam's good as Freddie! Certainly not me........this is QUEENzone after all.......we're pretty much all Queen fans first and foremost, whether we think Adam's good or not.........
Lets get something straight here, other people on this thread have also stated they found Adam Lambert awful on xfactor
and have you bombarded them with your posts?
Secondly Queens gig at The Metro Arena Newcastle is selling slowly and when you think Kate bush sold her tour out in minutes then you can see
a lot of people are wary about madam lambert.
yes i have expressed my opinions on here about lambert, and everyone is not going to like him.
If Lambert was as popular as the hype then Queens gig would have sold out instantly.
I do give donations to the mercury phoenix trust, because Freddie was worth so much more than the idiots on here who say Lambert
is as good as freddie, what a stupid thing to say.
Freddie was voted the greatest rock singer ever, and he will always be untouchable for performance, vocal range and power on stage.
Lambert is nothing in comparison.
pingfah: just happens that this thread was about Adam Lambert so seemed the greatest vehicle to crow on about how much i dislike the smug little git!
He is not even on the greatest singers poll lists yet so i wish the hype would stop.
He is not worthy, i have heard better singing voices on cruise liners.
vocal harmony:: now don't throw your toys out of your rock n roll pram sweetie,
Kate Bush still had tickets for sale this year and so makes no difference how long its been since shes toured,
Polls are very important and let people know what is trending, so your the one who should be in the school playground.
yes in certain words people on here have said Lamberts vocals hold up to freddies, and some have even said freddie couldnt
do this or like lambert etc......
Personally i would not want to see Queen live again, because i would be dissapointed that the show
would be boring and flat without Deacy and Freddie.
Queen on Dvd much better idea yeah..
Wizzard: Other people on this thread have stated like me that they dislike Lamberts singing, like HOLLY2003
but i dont see you have a dig at her?
Because Holly isn't a complete idiot. He's stating his opinion on Lambert's voice without turning it into some kind of personal attack on people who disagree with him, nor does he garnish his opinion with factual inaccuracies ad nauseum.
On one concert he was drowning out Brians guitar playing
gerry wrote:
That is a stupid question!
If he cannot control the volume of his own voice then yes its his fault.
My god, you are such an idiot.
Do you not realize that at every concert in this world for the past 50 years there is a sound engineer at the front of house who completely controls the EQ and volume?
Freddie was voted the greatest rock singer ever, and he will always be untouchable for performance, vocal range and power on stage.
Vocal range?
Your idiocy enters its next chapter.
Find me one live version of Who Wants To Live Forever where Mercury can actually hit the high notes where Lambert does every night. Mercury, on the other hand, had to bring the song down a key to even attempt it.
In your mind this will translate as me saying "Lambert is a better singer than Mercury."
But that's what binary thinking does to you.
Of all the tens of thousands of adults I've ever seen discuss music, you are literally the stupidest one I have ever encountered. A lot of people don't know things about sound mixing or vocal range, but most of them aren't stupid enough to pretend to know when they clearly know nothing at all on the subject. You flaunt your ignorance the way a wise man flaunts his wisdom.
^ Actually Freddie had a larger vocal range if we're counting his falsetto (which we should).
Sure, of course.
But our village buffoon obviously didn't take that into consideration. He's blindly parroting that talking point with the agenda of trying to assert Mercury is better than Lambert in every conceivable way, which just isn't factually true.
On one concert he was drowning out Brians guitar playing
gerry wrote:
That is a stupid question!
If he cannot control the volume of his own voice then yes its his fault.
My god, you are such an idiot.
Do you not realize that at every concert in this world for the past 50 years there is a sound engineer at the front of house who completely controls the EQ and volume?
