I tried to get Houston (video) way back in 1999, but the asking price was £150. Quality was great, but I was at uni so had other priorities. Glad I waited ;)
Thread
Posts in chronological order
tomchristie22 wrote:
Perhaps he wrote something abrasive and then removed it.
This has actually gotten fairly interesting - I didn't realise things like Houston 77 which are freely available now were so hard to come by at a time which seems not that long ago (though 2007 really is a long time ago now).
The complete show first leaked in 2004 - but it was many generations from the master, with a green tint to it.
Before then, most people would've killed to see it. All we had was 35 minutes of average quality audio and a few video clips from documentaries.
Aha. Where did the full 2004 version actually come from?
What is the lineage of Sheffield 74?
It sounds like a master tape. Or maybe a very low gen.
Is it me or are there microclicks between the tracks?
Great quality!
It sounds like a master tape. Or maybe a very low gen.
Is it me or are there microclicks between the tracks?
Great quality!
What is the tracklisting for this gig? Any nice surprises?
Bummed I missed it, but interested to read this thread.
Bummed I missed it, but interested to read this thread.
dysan wrote:
What is the tracklisting for this gig? Any nice surprises?
Bummed I missed it, but interested to read this thread.
The set-list is the same as all of the others. No surprises.
I can pass in that case. Good quality though I assume?
dysan wrote:
What is the tracklisting for this gig? Any nice surprises?
Bummed I missed it, but interested to read this thread.
google cache is your friend...
Say whaaat
The quality is nice, it sounds a bit distant though.
people on streets wrote:dysan wrote:
What is the tracklisting for this gig? Any nice surprises?
Bummed I missed it, but interested to read this thread.
google cache is your friend...
Google Cache shows the same content.
You lost this: http://www.queenlive.ca/queen/74-11-05.htm. An audio recording of that concert, I think.
BETA215 wrote:
people on streets wrote:dysan wrote:
What is the tracklisting for this gig? Any nice surprises?
Bummed I missed it, but interested to read this thread.
google cache is your friend...
Google Cache shows the same content.
You lost this: http://www.queenlive.ca/queen/74-11-05.htm. An audio recording of that concert, I think.
You have to google the exact url ( wink ;) ) . is out there
Ozz wrote:BETA215 wrote:
people on streets wrote:dysan wrote:
What is the tracklisting for this gig? Any nice surprises?
Bummed I missed it, but interested to read this thread.
google cache is your friend...
Google Cache shows the same content.
You lost this: http://www.queenlive.ca/queen/74-11-05.htm. An audio recording of that concert, I think.
You have to google the exact url ( wink ;) ) . is out there
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:7vAIs_golvAJ:www.queenzone.com/forums/1417246/no-subject.aspx+&cd=1&hl=es-419&ct=clnk&gl=ar
The Real Wizard wrote:
Just For You wrote:
I won't name my source so as not to cause any further bad feeling, however this was in no way an attempt to break trust or "troll" (as some other person has suggested").
I will not be back. I had many, many great things to share, but am worried about an unwelcome impact now.
1) Sure, don't name names here, but you absolutely should tell Brian's Wig who your source is. The original tape is his, and he deserves to know who betrayed his trust. The chain can be traced, and you can help if you choose to.
2) No need to cut and run. If you say you have more things, then check with your sources to make sure that they're OK to be shared. If you didn't know that this Sheffield recording was a no fly zone, then how can you be sure that all of these other supposed things you possess have the same no-share status?
And, as expected, "Just For You" has disappeared into the wind after being given a fair and rational proposition.
This person obviously knew exactly what they were doing. Otherwise, why would an anonymous new user (with a Robinhood type name) join a forum only for this purpose?
Who wants to bet it was Dave R Fuller behind that? Scumbags be scumbagging, after all...