there is a huge difference between arguing the toss and using discriminatory language.
you were NOT privy to what went on, what Gerry said etc..you have no idea what actually brought about HIS removal - so stop making judgmental comparisons when you're not in a position to do so.
i removed his quote from my post at moderator's request - that should give you an idea of the nature of what was said that resulted in his removal.
but don't worry...you won't have to lament his absence too long...he'll be using one of his other IDs (rugby_guy
Mr Music Queen2) any moment
tero! 48531 · Member since
My point is perfectly valid, whether you like it or not.
You two were perfectly happy provoke Gerry, and to deliberately lower the level of discussion on QZ in the process.
But hey, it's alright as long as you remember to share a bootleg recording every now and then!
brENsKi · Member since
[QUOTE] [b]tero! 48531 wrote:[/b]
My point is perfectly valid, whether you like it or not.
You two were perfectly happy provoke Gerry, and to deliberately lower the level of discussion on QZ in the process.
But hey, it's alright as long as you remember to share a bootleg recording every now and then![/QUOTE]
no. you are wrong. in a nutshell you prove you are incapable of distinguishing between argument and homophobic abuse.
Gerry refused to ever have any of his "facts" amended or corrected by many people who knew the facts.
when corrected he then proceeded to be abusive to people. and any person would then react in kind.
btw - just because YOU didn't actually see the discriminatory post he made - doesn't mean his banning wasn't justified. there's a huge difference between posting provocational msgs and posting discriminatory msgs.
his post was hugely discriminatory - and in the outside world he'd have been arrested for it.
In fact, people HAVE been arrested and charged on twitter for the same.
the mods did exactly the right thing.
have to wonder why you would seek to defend someone who quite clearly was unashamedly homophobic - and proved this when his guard dropped.
he wasn't banned for using the c*** word. he was banned for discriminatory comments
stop defending the indefensible.
tero! 48531 · Member since
[QUOTE] [b]brENsKi wrote:[/b]
no. you are wrong. in a nutshell you prove you are incapable of distinguishing between argument and homophobic abuse.[/QUOTE]
Did I ever say that he wasn't homophobe, and when exactly was the last time I have defended him in any way? (I think you can find a neutral message defending him from your intentional provocations, but that's it.)
You took justice into your own hand provoking the argument, instead of raising the level of discussion. It makes you almost (if not just) as bad as Gerry, even if it's in a different way.
If there's anything wrong the majority of posters on QZ, it's the fact that they are more interested in petty personal squabbles instead of constructing rational arguments.
brENsKi · Member since
you are being a dick.
"we" (the people you accuse of bullying him) have tried reasoning over the last six months....but in every single discussion all he ever understands is argument...and insults.
also - if he had retained even a granule of the brains he was born with he may have realised that when I said i worked as an Equality Manager - that perhaps this was the right time to check his own comments - or at least edit his own thoughts before putting them out there.
fwiw - i have never called him a cunt. something he seems to love calling everyone.
[QUOTE] [b]tero! 48531 wrote:[/b]You took justice into your own hand provoking the argument, instead of raising the level of discussion. It makes you almost (if not just) as bad as Gerry, even if it's in a different way.
[/QUOTE]
ffs - instead of assuming what went on try reading it.
and as for having him removed? No - and don't even hint at suggesting it either. I suggested that the comment he made be removed - nothing more. Mods took the decision to remove him also.
you're starting to sound like Gerry. and in the interests of peace and love - i'm not arguing this any further - i know i did no wrong. you can have the last word. i know you will.
do yourself a huge favour - before you make a bigger fool of yourself. read this thread from last week - examine just how much I and others tried to reason with him...and then accept how futile reasoning with him is
http://www.queenzone.com/forums/1417629/do-you-think-the-younger-generation-only-cares-about-freddies-aids-status.aspx?page=2
inu-liger · Member since
Tero, I hope you are not seriously trying to step up the game to try and take Gerry's place. We do not need any more of that type of garbage, thank you very much.
Saint Jiub · Member since
So now any one who disagrees with the lords of QZ automatically is the next "Gerry". Brilliant
BETA215 · Member since
[QUOTE]
[b]Panchgani wrote: [/b] So now any one who disagrees with the lords of QZ automatically is the next "Gerry". Brilliant[/QUOTE]
"Tero, I hope you are not seriously trying to step up the game to try and take Gerry's place. We do not need any more of that type of garbage, thank you very much."
He never said:
"Tero, I hope you shut your mouth, you are taking Gerry's place. Don't do it, we do not need any more of that type of garbage, thank you very much." [b] Stop victimizing yourself.[/b]
inu-liger · Member since
Beta, he has been following me here and there in just about any topic that somehow involves the obvious issues that we will never agree to see eye to eye on and always trying to find a convenient excuse to paint me exclusively as a bad guy any way that he can, and this has been going on for up to a few years now, especially when he was part of the trio who tried to gang up and bully me off the website for some time (only to earn serious rebukes from YV along the way) when the Fuller/Fanthology fracas first happened.
I don't expect him to stop the irrational self-victimization anytime soon, although it would certainly be appreciated the sooner that that would happen - but I won't be holding my breath.
Saint Jiub · Member since
[QUOTE] [b]inu-liger wrote:[/b]
Beta, he has been following me here and there in just about any topic that somehow involves the obvious issues that we will never agree to see eye to eye on and always trying to find a convenient excuse to paint me exclusively as a bad guy any way that he can, and this has been going on for up to a few years now, especially when he was part of the trio who tried to gang up and bully me off the website for some time (only to earn serious rebukes from YV along the way) when the Fuller/Fanthology fracas first happened.
I don't expect him to stop the irrational self-victimization anytime soon, although it would certainly be appreciated the sooner that that would happen - but I won't be holding my breath.[/QUOTE]
Have you been granted moderator powers yet?
I wonder why?
*goodco* · Member since
sigh........and to think that this place was so peaceful for a couple of hours after the wall hit the fan.....
Beta, he has been following me here and there in just about any topic that somehow involves the obvious issues that we will never agree to see eye to eye on and always trying to find a convenient excuse to paint me exclusively as a bad guy any way that he can, and this has been going on for up to a few years now, especially when he was part of the trio who tried to gang up and bully me off the website for some time (only to earn serious rebukes from YV along the way) when the Fuller/Fanthology fracas first happened.
I don't expect him to stop the irrational self-victimization anytime soon, although it would certainly be appreciated the sooner that that would happen - but I won't be holding my breath.[/QUOTE]
Have you been granted moderator powers yet?
I wonder why?
[/QUOTE]
Because Richard is busy playing Super Mario 3D Land in his New Nintendo 3DS. It's none of your business, dude.
inu-liger · Member since
Correction: I only got a DS Lite recently (used for $50 but in great condition, which is not bad at all)
But nice guess there Beta :)
Beta, he has been following me here and there in just about any topic that somehow involves the obvious issues that we will never agree to see eye to eye on and always trying to find a convenient excuse to paint me exclusively as a bad guy any way that he can, and this has been going on for up to a few years now, especially when he was part of the trio who tried to gang up and bully me off the website for some time (only to earn serious rebukes from YV along the way) when the Fuller/Fanthology fracas first happened.
I don't expect him to stop the irrational self-victimization anytime soon, although it would certainly be appreciated the sooner that that would happen - but I won't be holding my breath.[/QUOTE]
Have you been granted moderator powers yet?
I wonder why?
[/QUOTE] Has *anyone* been "granted moderator powers" since this site's early days? No, you say? Gee, Panchgani, doesn't that kind of make your attempted jab sound rather empty and more than a little petty and sad?
tero! 48531 · Member since
[QUOTE] [b]brENsKi wrote:[/b]
you're starting to sound like Gerry. and in the interests of peace and love - i'm not arguing this any further - i know i did no wrong. you can have the last word. i know you will.
[/QUOTE]
If only you would have done the same with Gerry...
1) a troll doesn't carry on without his audience
2) a hot-headed poster doesn't get worked up without provocation
3) a normal poster changes his tone or leaves if nobody answers him
"It takes two to tango" as they say, and you did escalate the situation. Even if it wasn't on purpose.