Costa86
Observant?! It borders on obsession. Do you think fans of Madonna or Mick Jagger know how many spots they have on their arms?
Thread
Posts in chronological order
Mr.QueenFan
[QUOTE] [b]Costa86 wrote:[/b]
Observant?! It borders on obsession. Do you think fans of Madonna or Mick Jagger know how many spots they have on their arms? [/QUOTE]
People can like or not like to discuss this issue. I know that the AIDS topic still throw people away of their confort zone, as it can be seen on this thread. But there´s no need to start offending people who bring this topic to the table.
But just to clarify, there´s no need to be obsessive to notice this sign. It´s so obvious that the difficult thing is to ignore it.
Observant?! It borders on obsession. Do you think fans of Madonna or Mick Jagger know how many spots they have on their arms? [/QUOTE]
People can like or not like to discuss this issue. I know that the AIDS topic still throw people away of their confort zone, as it can be seen on this thread. But there´s no need to start offending people who bring this topic to the table.
But just to clarify, there´s no need to be obsessive to notice this sign. It´s so obvious that the difficult thing is to ignore it.
Biggus Dickus
[QUOTE]
[b]Costa86 wrote: [/b] Observant?! It borders on obsession. Do you think fans of Madonna or Mick Jagger know how many spots they have on their arms?[/QUOTE]
I don't care. If he lifts his arm and I see a spot I'd hardly call that obsession. I assume you've got bad eyesight or something.
[b]Costa86 wrote: [/b] Observant?! It borders on obsession. Do you think fans of Madonna or Mick Jagger know how many spots they have on their arms?[/QUOTE]
I don't care. If he lifts his arm and I see a spot I'd hardly call that obsession. I assume you've got bad eyesight or something.
miraclesteinway
We can see the spot there, clear as day, but honestly, there's no way to know if it's KS. I'm not a doctor so I don't know what early stage KS looks like. It could be a bruise, or it could be something else. It could be KS. Who knows?
Costa86
Someone (Big Dickus I think?) mentioned seeing the spot in Rock in Rio photos. That was news to me - and that's why I said 'obsessive' - not about the Live Aid spot, which is pretty bloody obvious - but about the Rock in Rio one. Show me the Rock in Rio one, which nobody has ever mentioned before. Then proceed to make your case that your spotting this supposed spot, during a concert of which we only have mostly low quality footage, and not very good quality photos, is not obsessive.
Biggus Dickus
[QUOTE]
[b]Costa86 wrote: [/b] Someone (Big Dickus I think?) mentioned seeing the spot in Rock in Rio photos. That was news to me - and that's why I said 'obsessive' - not about the Live Aid spot, which is pretty bloody obvious - but about the Rock in Rio one. Show me the Rock in Rio one, which nobody has ever mentioned before. Then proceed to make your case that your spotting this supposed spot, during a concert of which we only have mostly low quality footage, and not very good quality photos, is not obsessive.[/QUOTE]
I saw it in the video footage. It's not my job to find it for you. If you're so obsessed, go find it yourself. I don't need to make a case about my observations either, as I don't care what you think of me. Go ahead and call me obsessed, I know the truth.
[b]Costa86 wrote: [/b] Someone (Big Dickus I think?) mentioned seeing the spot in Rock in Rio photos. That was news to me - and that's why I said 'obsessive' - not about the Live Aid spot, which is pretty bloody obvious - but about the Rock in Rio one. Show me the Rock in Rio one, which nobody has ever mentioned before. Then proceed to make your case that your spotting this supposed spot, during a concert of which we only have mostly low quality footage, and not very good quality photos, is not obsessive.[/QUOTE]
I saw it in the video footage. It's not my job to find it for you. If you're so obsessed, go find it yourself. I don't need to make a case about my observations either, as I don't care what you think of me. Go ahead and call me obsessed, I know the truth.
miraclesteinway
Truth is all we know is there is a mark on his arm. We don't know what it is.
Costa86
[QUOTE] [b]Biggus Dickus wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE]
[b]Costa86 wrote: [/b] Someone (Big Dickus I think?) mentioned seeing the spot in Rock in Rio photos. That was news to me - and that's why I said 'obsessive' - not about the Live Aid spot, which is pretty bloody obvious - but about the Rock in Rio one. Show me the Rock in Rio one, which nobody has ever mentioned before. Then proceed to make your case that your spotting this supposed spot, during a concert of which we only have mostly low quality footage, and not very good quality photos, is not obsessive.[/QUOTE]
I saw it in the video footage. It's not my job to find it for you. If you're so obsessed, go find it yourself. I don't need to make a case about my observations either, as I don't care what you think of me. Go ahead and call me obsessed, I know the truth.[/QUOTE]
So it's ok for you to make an illogical leap by saying that Freddie had the same spot at both Rock in Rio (Jan 85) and Live Aid (Jul 85), and thus this increases the likelihood of it being Kaposi's, because bruises would have healed in 7 months. But then it is unreasonable and obsessive of me to ask for you to show a screenshot of said spot?
Last time I checked, an assertion demands at least some cursory evidence when possible - and especially so when something tangible, like an image or video are involved. Otherwise, why even bother making the assertion?
[QUOTE]
[b]Costa86 wrote: [/b] Someone (Big Dickus I think?) mentioned seeing the spot in Rock in Rio photos. That was news to me - and that's why I said 'obsessive' - not about the Live Aid spot, which is pretty bloody obvious - but about the Rock in Rio one. Show me the Rock in Rio one, which nobody has ever mentioned before. Then proceed to make your case that your spotting this supposed spot, during a concert of which we only have mostly low quality footage, and not very good quality photos, is not obsessive.[/QUOTE]
I saw it in the video footage. It's not my job to find it for you. If you're so obsessed, go find it yourself. I don't need to make a case about my observations either, as I don't care what you think of me. Go ahead and call me obsessed, I know the truth.[/QUOTE]
So it's ok for you to make an illogical leap by saying that Freddie had the same spot at both Rock in Rio (Jan 85) and Live Aid (Jul 85), and thus this increases the likelihood of it being Kaposi's, because bruises would have healed in 7 months. But then it is unreasonable and obsessive of me to ask for you to show a screenshot of said spot?
Last time I checked, an assertion demands at least some cursory evidence when possible - and especially so when something tangible, like an image or video are involved. Otherwise, why even bother making the assertion?
Biggus Dickus
[QUOTE]
[b]Costa86 wrote: [/b] [QUOTE] [b]Biggus Dickus wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE]
[b]Costa86 wrote: [/b] Someone (Big Dickus I think?) mentioned seeing the spot in Rock in Rio photos. That was news to me - and that's why I said 'obsessive' - not about the Live Aid spot, which is pretty bloody obvious - but about the Rock in Rio one. Show me the Rock in Rio one, which nobody has ever mentioned before. Then proceed to make your case that your spotting this supposed spot, during a concert of which we only have mostly low quality footage, and not very good quality photos, is not obsessive.[/QUOTE]
I saw it in the video footage. It's not my job to find it for you. If you're so obsessed, go find it yourself. I don't need to make a case about my observations either, as I don't care what you think of me. Go ahead and call me obsessed, I know the truth.[/QUOTE]
So it's ok for you to make an illogical leap by saying that Freddie had the same spot at both Rock in Rio (Jan 85) and Live Aid (Jul 85), and thus this increases the likelihood of it being Kaposi's, because bruises would have healed in 7 months. But then it is unreasonable and obsessive of me to ask for you to show a screenshot of said spot?
Last time I checked, an assertion demands at least some cursory evidence when possible - and especially so when something tangible, like an image or video are involved. Otherwise, why even bother making the assertion?[/QUOTE]
I'm not going to go through 60 minutes of video footage just to take a screenshot, I've got more important things to do. If you don't believe me that's fine, doesn't rock my world one way or another.
[b]Costa86 wrote: [/b] [QUOTE] [b]Biggus Dickus wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE]
[b]Costa86 wrote: [/b] Someone (Big Dickus I think?) mentioned seeing the spot in Rock in Rio photos. That was news to me - and that's why I said 'obsessive' - not about the Live Aid spot, which is pretty bloody obvious - but about the Rock in Rio one. Show me the Rock in Rio one, which nobody has ever mentioned before. Then proceed to make your case that your spotting this supposed spot, during a concert of which we only have mostly low quality footage, and not very good quality photos, is not obsessive.[/QUOTE]
I saw it in the video footage. It's not my job to find it for you. If you're so obsessed, go find it yourself. I don't need to make a case about my observations either, as I don't care what you think of me. Go ahead and call me obsessed, I know the truth.[/QUOTE]
So it's ok for you to make an illogical leap by saying that Freddie had the same spot at both Rock in Rio (Jan 85) and Live Aid (Jul 85), and thus this increases the likelihood of it being Kaposi's, because bruises would have healed in 7 months. But then it is unreasonable and obsessive of me to ask for you to show a screenshot of said spot?
Last time I checked, an assertion demands at least some cursory evidence when possible - and especially so when something tangible, like an image or video are involved. Otherwise, why even bother making the assertion?[/QUOTE]
I'm not going to go through 60 minutes of video footage just to take a screenshot, I've got more important things to do. If you don't believe me that's fine, doesn't rock my world one way or another.