Sorry for the empty post.
It shouldn't be hard to use non QTV version to replace QTV watermark. Just crop it.
It's MUCH harder than that. You would have to have identical frame count - each version I checked had different frames missing. Also each version "moves" differently, has different colours...
Hi
this message is for Chief Mouse:
I have a copy of Hyde Park video with slightly better quality that the QTV version.
Is the best copy I've got in more of 25 years collecting videos.
Are you interested in put your pagic in this video?
Let me, know to see we can we do.
take care
Cesar
Is your version any better than the one shared by Antiden?
Would you mind providing a video sample cut out without re-compressing (software like Mpeg2Cut2 for example)? Thanks :)
This version is the best version ever I've seen. It's bright, no burried informations like every edited version. Raw QTV version can be better, but I haven't seen it yet.
Raw file of this video - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AC-H0kF--JI - should be the best (video).
This version is the best version ever I've seen. It's bright, no burried informations like every edited version. Raw QTV version can be better, but I haven't seen it yet.
Raw file of this video - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AC-H0kF--JI - should be the best (video).
Now you know why I spend a lot of more time in QueenZone instead of in YouTube? QueenZone rules! (excepting his code)