matt z
Thread
Posts in chronological order
pittrek
For which purpose? One time sex or a long term relationship?
Chief Mouse
That's heavy.
The King Of Rhye
The question is, what do you consider to be a 'fat girl'.....after all, the average-sized woman would be considered "plus-size" in the modeling world.
The King Of Rhye
[url]https://scontent-ord1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpf1/v/t1.0-9/11813432_515424191947612_485662507205900247_n.jpg?oh=487093b1717eff8dbb928076f405aa52&oe=563B4584[/url]
(I used to be able to do attachments here......)
(I used to be able to do attachments here......)
Fat Bottomed Queen
I usaully do, but it depends, just the same as it does with thinner people.
Thistle
Fat Bottomed Girls...make the rockin' world go round.
Seriously though....shocking question. What does it matter?
Seriously though....shocking question. What does it matter?
Costa86
Fat, no. Kind of chubby, yes. General rule of thumb is not more than 155lbs/70kg.
Body shape plays a big part though. Some girls can carry 155lbs really well - it makes them look curvy. Others seem to gather all the fat in one place (e.g. the 'top heavy' look, huge torso but disproportionately thinner legs).
But tbh, if a girl has a really nice face, I'm generally willing to make a few concessions figure-wise. Might even go up to 160lbs. But that makes it a bit difficult to carry them for any considerable distance.
Body shape plays a big part though. Some girls can carry 155lbs really well - it makes them look curvy. Others seem to gather all the fat in one place (e.g. the 'top heavy' look, huge torso but disproportionately thinner legs).
But tbh, if a girl has a really nice face, I'm generally willing to make a few concessions figure-wise. Might even go up to 160lbs. But that makes it a bit difficult to carry them for any considerable distance.
Oscar J
This question kinda presumes that we're all shallow heterosexual men who judge women based on appearance and weight, not knowing/caring about what consequences that has for women all over the world.
pittrek
[QUOTE] [b]Oscar J wrote:[/b]
This question kinda presumes that we're all shallow heterosexual men who judge women based on appearance and weight, not knowing/caring about what consequences that has for women all over the world. [/QUOTE]
Fully agree.
This question kinda presumes that we're all shallow heterosexual men who judge women based on appearance and weight, not knowing/caring about what consequences that has for women all over the world. [/QUOTE]
Fully agree.
matt z
Geez.. it was just an excuse to toss in a joke in a relatively tedious dull day of constant study.
But (!) I'm sick of people going around saying you can't say the word fat.
How else are We going to distinguish between muscle and fat when discussing biology and mass weight? ... what terms should someone use if they're going to drink "Low fat" milk?...
Will a doctor have to discuss using these terms:..
My my we're going to have to do something about your rotundity.... your non muscle retention is getting out of hand
But (!) I'm sick of people going around saying you can't say the word fat.
How else are We going to distinguish between muscle and fat when discussing biology and mass weight? ... what terms should someone use if they're going to drink "Low fat" milk?...
Will a doctor have to discuss using these terms:..
My my we're going to have to do something about your rotundity.... your non muscle retention is getting out of hand
Costa86
[QUOTE] [b]Oscar J wrote:[/b]
This question kinda presumes that we're all shallow heterosexual men who judge women based on appearance and weight, not knowing/caring about what consequences that has for women all over the world. [/QUOTE]
I'd be the first to proclaim that if a woman is witty, charistmatic, interesting, kind, etc., all this will supersede her physical qualities - to the extent that she isn't morbidly obese, in which case I don't think I could overlook this.
Women probably place more of emphasis on looks than men. And an even greater emphasis on money. I don't know many poor, bald, short, obese men who have particularly eye-catching girlfriends, but I can name a few such men who happen to be rich rather than poor, who have a stunning wife.
In reality, most of us end up with a woman of average-to-overweight figure, because most of us are of average figure ourselves, and of average income.
Men might pass a lot of remarks amongst themselves while at the bar, about how they want a fine young blonde, and so on - but that's all rubbish - we are actually content with a flabby wife because we know it won't get much better than that.
This bullshit "anti-sexist" I-love-you-for-your-mind anti-male-chauvinst crap has reached it's expiry date.
This question kinda presumes that we're all shallow heterosexual men who judge women based on appearance and weight, not knowing/caring about what consequences that has for women all over the world. [/QUOTE]
I'd be the first to proclaim that if a woman is witty, charistmatic, interesting, kind, etc., all this will supersede her physical qualities - to the extent that she isn't morbidly obese, in which case I don't think I could overlook this.
Women probably place more of emphasis on looks than men. And an even greater emphasis on money. I don't know many poor, bald, short, obese men who have particularly eye-catching girlfriends, but I can name a few such men who happen to be rich rather than poor, who have a stunning wife.
In reality, most of us end up with a woman of average-to-overweight figure, because most of us are of average figure ourselves, and of average income.
Men might pass a lot of remarks amongst themselves while at the bar, about how they want a fine young blonde, and so on - but that's all rubbish - we are actually content with a flabby wife because we know it won't get much better than that.
This bullshit "anti-sexist" I-love-you-for-your-mind anti-male-chauvinst crap has reached it's expiry date.
Costa86
[QUOTE] [b]matt z wrote:[/b]
Geez.. it was just an excuse to toss in a joke in a relatively tedious dull day of constant study.
But (!) I'm sick of people going around saying you can't say the word fat.
How else are We going to distinguish between muscle and fat when discussing biology and mass weight? ... what terms should someone use if they're going to drink "Low fat" milk?...
Will a doctor have to discuss using these terms:..
My my we're going to have to do something about your rotundity.... your non muscle retention is getting out of hand[/QUOTE]
Fully agree. A fat nasty bitch is a fat nasty bitch, a thin useless bastard is a thin useless bastard, and a curvy horny gal is a curvy horny gal.
Geez.. it was just an excuse to toss in a joke in a relatively tedious dull day of constant study.
But (!) I'm sick of people going around saying you can't say the word fat.
How else are We going to distinguish between muscle and fat when discussing biology and mass weight? ... what terms should someone use if they're going to drink "Low fat" milk?...
Will a doctor have to discuss using these terms:..
My my we're going to have to do something about your rotundity.... your non muscle retention is getting out of hand[/QUOTE]
Fully agree. A fat nasty bitch is a fat nasty bitch, a thin useless bastard is a thin useless bastard, and a curvy horny gal is a curvy horny gal.
Oscar J
I realise that you guys probably don't mean anything bad, but I find it hard to let stuff like this pass when millions of girls and women suffer from bad confidence and eating disorders due to body shape ideals.
And no, this isn't getting old. What's getting old is women (and men, mind you!) constantly having to hear how they should/shouldn't look.
Allright, I'll bugger off now. :)
And no, this isn't getting old. What's getting old is women (and men, mind you!) constantly having to hear how they should/shouldn't look.
Allright, I'll bugger off now. :)
matt z
Well. There's a REASON for pointing it out and not ignoring it. Just as GOUT has telling signs and jaundice can denote poor liver functioning. If EVERYTHING is held in a positive light and pussy footed around then a NEGATIVE effect could happen as well.
Being unable to walk around without knocking things over. Excessive sweating, chest pains, Excessive weight. ... are all FUNCTIONAL BIOLOGICAL INDICATORS stating there is a problem.
I DO have sympathy for people who've lost it past a certain point... I've watched and been horrified at times in my life by Jerry Springer's old "shut in by morbid obesity" episodes as well as LIFETIME channels recenT MY 800 LB life or whatever it's called.
The human thing would be to notice it once it's around 250 and curb the problem before it's no longer possible to lose the weight without the aid of a massive surgical team.
Me. .. I'd probably fit in the "useless bastard" category at the moment from being laid off and my artistic abilities curbed by space unavailability.
It's still hopefully only temporary and although it's better than being retarded. I think some of them may have me at the advantage if they happen to be retarded AND happy skippy.
Either way. Too Much of anything is by definition too much.
Point is there's a beneficial aspect of categorization, although it may upset people. Just try to end it all and do a CO-OP BOXING association. .. see how quickly those opinions would change....
No one wants to see a woman bludgeoned around a ring.
Except chauvinists and maybe lesbians
Being unable to walk around without knocking things over. Excessive sweating, chest pains, Excessive weight. ... are all FUNCTIONAL BIOLOGICAL INDICATORS stating there is a problem.
I DO have sympathy for people who've lost it past a certain point... I've watched and been horrified at times in my life by Jerry Springer's old "shut in by morbid obesity" episodes as well as LIFETIME channels recenT MY 800 LB life or whatever it's called.
The human thing would be to notice it once it's around 250 and curb the problem before it's no longer possible to lose the weight without the aid of a massive surgical team.
Me. .. I'd probably fit in the "useless bastard" category at the moment from being laid off and my artistic abilities curbed by space unavailability.
It's still hopefully only temporary and although it's better than being retarded. I think some of them may have me at the advantage if they happen to be retarded AND happy skippy.
Either way. Too Much of anything is by definition too much.
Point is there's a beneficial aspect of categorization, although it may upset people. Just try to end it all and do a CO-OP BOXING association. .. see how quickly those opinions would change....
No one wants to see a woman bludgeoned around a ring.
Except chauvinists and maybe lesbians