Ivo-1976
Was he wearing his "going to the strip club" outfit again?
Thread
Posts in chronological order
mooghead
[QUOTE] [b]Ivo-1976 wrote:[/b]
Was he wearing his "going to the strip club" outfit again?[/QUOTE]
Brilliant.. 10 years ago maybe. Try again.
Was he wearing his "going to the strip club" outfit again?[/QUOTE]
Brilliant.. 10 years ago maybe. Try again.
Doga
[QUOTE] [b]mooghead wrote:[/b]
The DM gets more hits than any other 'newspaper' on earth. Says more about the general public than the publication, that is why they keep doing what they do.... It has got thousands of comments? Just encouraging them to intrude, which makes people click...... the most vicious of circles....[/QUOTE]
I have to agree 100% with that.
The DM gets more hits than any other 'newspaper' on earth. Says more about the general public than the publication, that is why they keep doing what they do.... It has got thousands of comments? Just encouraging them to intrude, which makes people click...... the most vicious of circles....[/QUOTE]
I have to agree 100% with that.
people on streets
Leave him alone.
stevelondon20
I agree. John should be left alone. He can't even leave his house in Putney without being photographed.
master marathon runner
Well said Matt.
NickESB
Daily Mail: the newspaper that said after Princess Diana's death in 1997 that it would never buy a paparazzi shot ever again.
It's website is full of them.
Vile newspaper with a vile editor.
It's website is full of them.
Vile newspaper with a vile editor.
Costa86
[QUOTE] [b]NickESB wrote:[/b]
Daily Mail: the newspaper that said after Princess Diana's death in 1997 that it would never buy a paparazzi shot ever again.
It's website is full of them.
Vile newspaper with a vile editor.[/QUOTE]
The worst thing about it is that it spreads half-truths, lies and utter tosh, and that it somewhat contributes to the dumbing down of society. That's even worse than stalking celebrities.
Daily Mail: the newspaper that said after Princess Diana's death in 1997 that it would never buy a paparazzi shot ever again.
It's website is full of them.
Vile newspaper with a vile editor.[/QUOTE]
The worst thing about it is that it spreads half-truths, lies and utter tosh, and that it somewhat contributes to the dumbing down of society. That's even worse than stalking celebrities.
Doga
[QUOTE] [b]Costa86 wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]NickESB wrote:[/b]
Daily Mail: the newspaper that said after Princess Diana's death in 1997 that it would never buy a paparazzi shot ever again.
It's website is full of them.
Vile newspaper with a vile editor.[/QUOTE]
The worst thing about it is that it spreads half-truths, lies and utter tosh, and that it somewhat contributes to the dumbing down of society. That's even worse than stalking celebrities.[/QUOTE]
Sadly, i have to agree with that too. Society in general is really dumb and some media create content to specifically appeal that big and dumb part. Low quality material, half truths and sensacionalism are taken for granted if that sells more. This is one of the signs of decadence.
As for this particular topic, we should ignore all "John Deacon content" released without his agreement. The guy wants to stay out of public focus and we should respect that.
[QUOTE] [b]NickESB wrote:[/b]
Daily Mail: the newspaper that said after Princess Diana's death in 1997 that it would never buy a paparazzi shot ever again.
It's website is full of them.
Vile newspaper with a vile editor.[/QUOTE]
The worst thing about it is that it spreads half-truths, lies and utter tosh, and that it somewhat contributes to the dumbing down of society. That's even worse than stalking celebrities.[/QUOTE]
Sadly, i have to agree with that too. Society in general is really dumb and some media create content to specifically appeal that big and dumb part. Low quality material, half truths and sensacionalism are taken for granted if that sells more. This is one of the signs of decadence.
As for this particular topic, we should ignore all "John Deacon content" released without his agreement. The guy wants to stay out of public focus and we should respect that.
hobbit in Rhye
[QUOTE] [b]matt z wrote:[/b]
Funny though.... John walks wearily down the street..... (MAD LIBS)
....with his hair lost long ago?
...his tan line lost long ago?
...with his mail wherever he goes?
...where's his bass? nobody knows
...
I dunno.
maybe it sucks to be him, but I DO enjoy seeing his pictures now and then. Can't help love the guy, though I've never met him.
These f####ers wrote some music that engaged and captivated me in my teens to keep me sorta sane.
Can't say I owe them enough. Good to see John, even though he looks as if he's almost harrassed[/QUOTE]
That's poetic, Matt.
Funny though.... John walks wearily down the street..... (MAD LIBS)
....with his hair lost long ago?
...his tan line lost long ago?
...with his mail wherever he goes?
...where's his bass? nobody knows
...
I dunno.
maybe it sucks to be him, but I DO enjoy seeing his pictures now and then. Can't help love the guy, though I've never met him.
These f####ers wrote some music that engaged and captivated me in my teens to keep me sorta sane.
Can't say I owe them enough. Good to see John, even though he looks as if he's almost harrassed[/QUOTE]
That's poetic, Matt.
Chief Mouse
If anyone's interested.. John is still alive :-) I got this today in mail - [url=http://i.imgur.com/u2ycvkd.jpg]http://i.imgur.com/u2ycvkd.jpg[/url] .
hobbit in Rhye
It's a signature from 2010...
Are you sure he's still around in 2015? ;)
Are you sure he's still around in 2015? ;)
musicland munich
No, it`s a five, look more closely :)
Nice one Chief :)
Nice one Chief :)
Oscar J
Awesome Chief!
Costa86
[QUOTE] [b]Chief Mouse wrote:[/b]
If anyone's interested.. John is still alive :-) I got this today in mail - [url=http://i.imgur.com/u2ycvkd.jpg]http://i.imgur.com/u2ycvkd.jpg[/url] .[/QUOTE]
Cool! Very nice.
If anyone's interested.. John is still alive :-) I got this today in mail - [url=http://i.imgur.com/u2ycvkd.jpg]http://i.imgur.com/u2ycvkd.jpg[/url] .[/QUOTE]
Cool! Very nice.