Queen crest Queenzone

Coventry 1975 FLAC (update)

45 posts Page 3 of 3
Thread

Posts in chronological order

· Member since
Awesome, thank you for the new transfer! :)

-Chin
Check out my channel for various goodies! :) http://www.youtube.com/user/Chinwonder2 Join us on the new forum here: http://queenforum.net/
· Member since
Many thanks for the new transfer.
· Member since
Thank you for squeezing the last drop of juice from these old tapes (although the very last one would be a hi-res transfer).
· Member since
Thank you for the updated version!
· Member since
[QUOTE] [b]aristide1 wrote:[/b]

Thank you for squeezing the last drop of juice from these old tapes (although the very last one would be a hi-res transfer).[/QUOTE]
In theory, yes.
However, this particular old tape would not benefit from such a procedure, unless remastering was a consideration.
Was that your intention?

Other things to consider:-
The RH channel is low level in places (it's been amplified as and when on this share, hence some additional hiss in places on that channel).

I would offer a 24/96 raw transfer, but I really don't think it would result in any significant improvement should a remaster be attempted.
· Member since
24/96 doesn't sound better but it's important to have a superior source for further enhancements.
Speed correction + noise reduction + eq require this extra space to be effective.

The subject is somehow absurd because producing 24/96 isn't more expensive or more time consuming than 16/44.
Why eat at Wimpy instead of Heston Blumenthal, assuming the price is the same on both?
· Member since
[QUOTE] [b]aristide1 wrote:[/b]

24/96 doesn't sound better but it's important to have a superior source for further enhancements.
Speed correction + noise reduction + eq require this extra space to be effective.
The subject is somehow absurd because producing 24/96 isn't more expensive or more time consuming than 16/44.
[/QUOTE]
I know that, but you haven't answered my question.
Would it be your intention to attempt to do this on a 24/96 transfer?
PS. A 24/96 upload is far more time consuming than a 16/44.
· Member since
I'd like to give it a try, if you also feel there is a potential for improvement.
· Member since
[QUOTE] [b]aristide1 wrote:[/b]

I'd like to give it a try, if you also feel there is a potential for improvement.[/QUOTE]
Personally, I don't think there is.
But I am quite prepared to make a 24/96 transfer and send you a link if you want me to.
· Member since
It would be nice, but only if you have fun doing this, playing with the new deck, otherwise the present version is ok for me.
Don't want to be hypocrite and pretend hi-res is mandatory.
· Member since
MERCI BEAUCOUP
· Member since
Thank you :)
· Member since
Here is a cue file if anyone wants it
· Member since
Here you go...

https://mega.nz/#F!UOIxXIZK!FTdC8tT2z0SpWBhRaQrF3g
· Member since
thanks!