[QUOTE] [b]The Fairy King wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]anderssteen wrote:[/b]
I very much agree with the topic.
i am interested in anything related to the original line-up, but I couldn't care less for Q+AL. To me these are two VERY different bands with each their expression of which only one suits my taste.
It would be nice to be able to unfollow just the Q+AL updates. [/QUOTE]
You can just ignore the Q+AL updates? Not that hard.
[/QUOTE]
Perhaps anderssteen doesn't want to see Lambert in his newsfeed to that degree in the first place to have to "ignore"?
Plus, "ignore" is a tad rich coming from you, what with your bizarre behaviour on this thread.
Surely taking your own advice might be the thing to do being as you don't cope well with differing opinion? Not that I mind. Carry on by all means.
[QUOTE] [b]The Fairy King wrote:[/b]
Dear Casper,
Really? You? Talk about hypocritical. :D
Missing the point again entirely as usual? And you, the principal lefty pc police should know by now that just "ignoring" doesn't help. We know since last November that just ignoring it doesn't really help. ;) Yeah, i made it political.
DISCLAIMER: My post wasn't 100% serious. Sure, the frustration is real, but unlike you i don't have the arrogance to even remotely think that i can actually change the minds of these morons. Next time pick your battles carefully and accordingly.
[/QUOTE]
So what are you saying? That anyone who doesn't rate XYZ shouldn't voice their opinion?
And if they do, you'll behave in an obnoxious manner as you have done?
You say "ignoring it doesn't help" and apparently you're making it political.
So where are you going there? That you're comparing a subjective opinion on music to what happened in politics in 2016?
What next? Queen fans are Nazis? Let's punch the bastards!
It seems you want people to be either nodding in agreement with you, or to be silent.
And you think someone's a "moron", just because they don't share the same opinion (on something of a subjective nature) as you? Why should anyone have their minds changed for not agreeing with you on something subjective anyway?
"Morons" you say? The irony...
And "Next time pick your battles carefully and accordingly."?
From where I'm standing, you're not in the best position to be dishing advice out on picking battles, being as your faulty logic has failed you all along and you've completely missed the points that have been made against your ill thought out arguments.
[QUOTE] [b]The Fairy King wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]anderssteen wrote:[/b]
I very much agree with the topic.
i am interested in anything related to the original line-up, but I couldn't care less for Q+AL. To me these are two VERY different bands with each their expression of which only one suits my taste.
It would be nice to be able to unfollow just the Q+AL updates. [/QUOTE]
You can just ignore the Q+AL updates? Not that hard.
[/QUOTE]
That's what I do, but as I said just before:
[QUOTE] [b]anderssteen wrote:[/b]
It would be nice to be able to unfollow just the Q+AL updates. [/QUOTE]
The Fairy King,
Of course I'm not Freddie. I'm not Madonna,Lady Gaga or Sia also.LOL
I said that I respect everybody's opinion and I expect that my opinion to be respected.
But my personal right is that I prefer to listen Freddie from CD and watch his live performances on You Tube.And I do not care if anyone tells me I'm stupid or old fashioned.
As can be seen from my posts, I have nothing against Adam.
I just say that Queen and Queen +Adam Lambert can not be the same thing.
And who prefer what, that's another matter.
Everyone has the right to love one thing or the other.Or both, why not.
To me Queen= Freddie,John,Brian,Roger.
I think so and that is it.
[QUOTE] [b]Day dop wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]The Fairy King wrote:[/b]
Ugh.
[/QUOTE]
Ah yes, the cry of a bug hitting a wall.
[QUOTE] [b]The Fairy King wrote:[/b]
Now tell me what exactly is the point of opening a thread about this? What is it that you want to achieve?
[/QUOTE]
To see if others feel the same way regarding the official Queen facebook page. Y'know? Communication? Chatty chatty?
This is the "general discussion" part of this form, after all.
Would you rather my differing opinion was silenced? Why are you so bothered by it to the point of losing your shit? (rhetorical question). [/QUOTE]
Were all your questions rhetorical? Do you know what rhetorical means?
[QUOTE] [b]Day dop wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]The Fairy King wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]anderssteen wrote:[/b]
I very much agree with the topic.
i am interested in anything related to the original line-up, but I couldn't care less for Q+AL. To me these are two VERY different bands with each their expression of which only one suits my taste.
It would be nice to be able to unfollow just the Q+AL updates. [/QUOTE]
You can just ignore the Q+AL updates? Not that hard.
[/QUOTE]
Perhaps anderssteen doesn't want to see Lambert in his newsfeed to that degree in the first place to have to "ignore"?
Plus, "ignore" is a tad rich coming from you, what with your bizarre behaviour on this thread.
Surely taking your own advice might be the thing to do being as you don't cope well with differing opinion? Not that I mind. Carry on by all means.[/QUOTE]
It's easy to ignore posts in your newsfeed. You can unsubscribe and look for other feeds that tickle your fancy. Stay in your bubble by all means, but don't moan when a brand chooses what news they want to release.
[QUOTE] [b]Day dop wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]The Fairy King wrote:[/b]
Dear Casper,
Really? You? Talk about hypocritical. :D
Missing the point again entirely as usual? And you, the principal lefty pc police should know by now that just "ignoring" doesn't help. We know since last November that just ignoring it doesn't really help. ;) Yeah, i made it political.
DISCLAIMER: My post wasn't 100% serious. Sure, the frustration is real, but unlike you i don't have the arrogance to even remotely think that i can actually change the minds of these morons. Next time pick your battles carefully and accordingly.
[/QUOTE]
So what are you saying? That anyone who doesn't rate XYZ shouldn't voice their opinion? [b]- Not if the point has been made a million times, with better arguments and no new points are being made. It has been discussed to death for the last 5 years. -[/b]
And if they do, you'll behave in an obnoxious manner as you have done?
[b]- Ah you learned a new word. Good for you - [/b]
You say "ignoring it doesn't help" and apparently you're making it political.
So where are you going there? That you're comparing a subjective opinion on music to what happened in politics in 2016?
[b]- Now you're just being petty.-[/b]
What next? Queen fans are Nazis? Let's punch the bastards!
[b]-Where did i say that? Bit farfetched.-[/b]
It seems you want people to be either nodding in agreement with you, or to be silent.
[b]-Nope, i just want them to think before they post and post something new. Everyone can be a critic, you're just acting like a baby.-[/b]
And you think someone's a "moron", just because they don't share the same opinion (on something of a subjective nature) as you?
[b]-Already explained-[/b]
Why should anyone have their minds changed for not agreeing with you on something subjective anyway?
[b]-Another one of your rhetorical questions?-[/b]
"Morons" you say? The irony...
[b]-Just being passive agressive i guess.-[/b]
And "Next time pick your battles carefully and accordingly."?
From where I'm standing, you're not in the best position to be dishing advice out on picking battles, being as your faulty logic has failed you all along and you've completely missed the points that have been made against your ill thought out arguments.
[b]-Hypocritical statement and you know why ;)-[/b]
[/QUOTE]
Let's agree to disagree. :D
[QUOTE] [b]Invisible Woman wrote:[/b]
The Fairy King,
Of course I'm not Freddie. I'm not Madonna,Lady Gaga or Sia also.LOL
I said that I respect everybody's opinion and I expect that my opinion to be respected.
But my personal right is that I prefer to listen Freddie from CD and watch his live performances on You Tube.And I do not care if anyone tells me I'm stupid or old fashioned.
As can be seen from my posts, I have nothing against Adam.
I just say that Queen and Queen +Adam Lambert can not be the same thing.
And who prefer what, that's another matter.
Everyone has the right to love one thing or the other.Or both, why not.
To me Queen= Freddie,John,Brian,Roger.
I think so and that is it.[/QUOTE]
Snap out of it. Not everyone has to respect your opinion. That's one the biggest lies you people tell yourselves.
Nobody says you don't have the right to listen to whatever you want. I never claimed you should do otherwise. Nobody said you're old-fashioned.
If people really value peoples opinions and they respect them for having them. Then why don't you respect Brian and Roger's opinion to tour with Adam, post whatever they want on social media? Or is this a one way street? Don't you think that these artists know what they're doing? They worked with Freddie for 20 years. Don't you think they know what's best for their brand?
For the record, i never said you don't have the right to hate Adam, to crap on Q+AL or criticize whoever. Just be aware that whatever words you put out there are open for debate. And if so many people are posting the same shit, then why still do it?
I think Q+AL is a Little travesty Show, if you watch Killer Queen for example:-)
Freddie woul laugh about him, and it´s no serious Show in my opinion.
[QUOTE] [b]The Fairy King wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]Day dop wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]The Fairy King wrote:[/b]
Ugh.
[/QUOTE]
Ah yes, the cry of a bug hitting a wall.
[QUOTE] [b]The Fairy King wrote:[/b]
Now tell me what exactly is the point of opening a thread about this? What is it that you want to achieve?
[/QUOTE]
To see if others feel the same way regarding the official Queen facebook page. Y'know? Communication? Chatty chatty?
This is the "general discussion" part of this form, after all.
Would you rather my differing opinion was silenced? Why are you so bothered by it to the point of losing your shit? (rhetorical question). [/QUOTE]
Were all your questions rhetorical? Do you know what rhetorical means? [/QUOTE]
Mostly they were, yes. But I made sure you understood that one was in particular as I wanted you to think about it rather than attempt to answer in words. Doesn't look like it worked though.
Yes, of course I know what "rhetorical" means. That's a weird question. Why do you ask?
The fact that you're asking if I know what it means suggests to me maybe that you think it's a difficult word and you don't know what it means. Why would you even ask that otherwise?
As it seems you either didn't pay attention at school, or perhaps English isn't your first language, let me remind you that Google is your friend. :-)
Here, I'm even assisting you by giving you a link:
http://bfy.tw/Ei6
Response to "My Fairy King"...
You wrote "It's easy to ignore posts in your newsfeed. You can unsubscribe and look for other feeds that tickle your fancy. Stay in your bubble by all means, but don't moan when a brand chooses what news they want to release. "
Which part of me talking about how I've unfollowed previously (and I have again now too) didn't you understand?
"A bubble" you say? That's amusing coming from you, being as me voicing my opinion on the matter has you losing the plot. Perhaps you ought to isolate yourself from others opinions you disagree with in future rather than burst blood vessels.
If I want to talk about it here, I will. And there's fuck all you can do about that other than throw an embarrassing strop, as you have done. In fact, I think I'll do it all the more in future. ;-)
I wrote "And if they do, you'll behave in an obnoxious manner as you have done?"
You replied "Ah you learned a new word. Good for you."
Which word? "Obnoxious"? Are you for real? Why on earth would you think that's a new word for me or anyone whose mother tongue is English?
This suggests to me once again, that English isn't your mother tongue. In which case, you're talking about yourself.
I wrote "You say "ignoring it doesn't help" and apparently you're making it political.
So where are you going there? That you're comparing a subjective opinion on music to what happened in politics in 2016?"
You replied "Now you're just being petty."
Not at all. I'm making the point that you're comparing subjective opinion on music to political events from 2016. Somewhat ridiculous of you, yes?
I wrote "What next? Queen fans are Nazis? Let's punch the bastards!"
You replied "Where did i say that? Bit farfetched."
I didn't say you did say that. I was taking the piss out of your poorly thought out comparison.
I wrote "It seems you want people to be either nodding in agreement with you, or to be silent."
You replied "Nope, i just want them to think before they post and post something new. Everyone can be a critic, you're just acting like a baby."
I thought before I posted. I always do. :-) As I should think others have too on this thread.
You, however, have taken issue with opinions that you disagree with (that you'd prefer them not to have), and because of that, you've been spitting your dummy left, right, and center.
And "acting like a baby"? Again, the irony truly eludes you. Either that or you're being disingenuous.
Continued...
I wrote "And you think someone's a "moron", just because they don't share the same opinion (on something of a subjective nature) as you?"
You wrote "Already explained."
Meaningless reply from you.
I'll drive this point home once again: You do understand that people have the right to their opinion, yes? And just because you disagree with it, that doesn't give you the right to spit your dummy behave in an shitty manner without being called out on it. This is really simple stuff. Why you can't grasp it, I don't know.
I wrote "Why should anyone have their minds changed for not agreeing with you on something subjective anyway?"
You replied "Another one of your rhetorical questions?"
Attempt to answer it. Go on. :-)
I wrote ""Morons" you say? The irony..."
You replied "Just being passive agressive i guess."
You are? Or are you accusing me of being passive aggressive? I can assure you I'm not. I have no issue confronting your poorly thought out bullshit arguments and dummy spitting tactics
I wrote And "Next time pick your battles carefully and accordingly."?
From where I'm standing, you're not in the best position to be dishing advice out on picking battles, being as your faulty logic has failed you all along and you've completely missed the points that have been made against your ill thought out arguments."
You replied "Hypocritical statement and you know why ;)"
You're not grasping this at all, are you? You're losing the plot to the point of name calling & behaving in an obnoxious manner over other peoples opinion on music / performances. I'm not. I'm pointing out how fucking ridiculous your behaviour is.
You wrote "Let's agree to disagree. :D"
Nope. Beacuse "agreeing to disagree" suggests your dummy spitting and poorly thought our arguments on this matter carries as much weight as those who you're being abhorrent to for merely voicing their views on music / performances. It doesn't.
You don't get to throw tantrums, throw strops,and behave in that manner because someone has a difference of opinion that you don't like, without your shitty behaviour being called out.
Simply put: I won't put up with your crap. Comprehendo?
[QUOTE] [b]Day dop wrote:[/b]
Continued...
I wrote "And you think someone's a "moron", just because they don't share the same opinion (on something of a subjective nature) as you?"
You wrote "Already explained."
Meaningless reply from you.
I'll drive this point home once again: You do understand that people have the right to their opinion, yes? And just because you disagree with it, that doesn't give you the right to spit your dummy behave in an shitty manner without being called out on it. This is really simple stuff. Why you can't grasp it, I don't know.
I wrote "Why should anyone have their minds changed for not agreeing with you on something subjective anyway?"
You replied "Another one of your rhetorical questions?"
Attempt to answer it. Go on. :-)
I wrote ""Morons" you say? The irony..."
You replied "Just being passive agressive i guess."
You are? Or are you accusing me of being passive aggressive? I can assure you I'm not. I have no issue confronting your poorly thought out bullshit arguments and dummy spitting tactics
I wrote And "Next time pick your battles carefully and accordingly."?
From where I'm standing, you're not in the best position to be dishing advice out on picking battles, being as your faulty logic has failed you all along and you've completely missed the points that have been made against your ill thought out arguments."
You replied "Hypocritical statement and you know why ;)"
You're not grasping this at all, are you? You're losing your plot to the point of name calling behaving in an obnoxious manner over other peoples opinion on music / performances. I'm not. I'm pointing out how fucking ridiculous your behaviour is.
You wrote "Let's agree to disagree. :D"
Nope. Beacuse "agreeing to disagree" suggests your opinion on this matter carries as much weight as those who you're disagreeing with. Simply put, it doesn't. That cop out phrase won't work here.
You don't get to throw tantrums, throw strops, and behave in an abhorrent manner because someone has a difference of opinion that you don't like, without your shitty behaviour being called out.
Simply put: I won't put up with your crap. Comprehendo? [/QUOTE]
Almost unreadable with all the grammar and spelling mistakes. English can't be your "mother tongue". :')
Comprehendo? Now you're making up words? Damn i really pissed you off. Holy sheep! Twas a good day. Thanks.
[QUOTE] [b]The Fairy King wrote:[/b]
Almost unreadable with all the grammar and spelling mistakes. English can't be your "mother tongue". :')
Comprehendo? Now you're making up words? Damn i really pissed you off. Holy sheep! Twas a good day. Thanks.
[/QUOTE]
Almost unreadable if you're a dunce, perhaps.
I think you'll find my English and grammar is perfectly fine (I noticed one place where I didn't end a sentence with a full stop, something you've done yourself, although my overall command of English is certainly a notch up from yours.I noticed your poor grammar and spelling as I went along. I made a typo. Big deal).
Here's another link for you. I suggest you read it and comprehend your poor tactics here.
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/ad-hominem
Oh, you're not familiar with "comprehendo"?
"(figuratively) I comprehend something by the mind, understand, perceive, grasp, comprehend."
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/comprehendo
See? You're learning a thing or two (or you could do, if you took in information).
Pissed off? Hardly. This is too easy for me.
It's becoming more and more apparent you're rather clueless when it comes to formulating arguments that hold up, which suggests to me you're projecting how you feel.
I'm not surprised you didn't attempt to answer the question on why you think people should have their minds changed.
Let's try again. You'll probably avoid and / or deflect (yet again). You're quite predictable, although I'll give you the benefit of the doubt by putting it to you again...
Why should anyone have their minds changed for not agreeing with you on something subjective?
