Queen crest Queenzone

NOTW Trailer Film Restoration

28 posts Page 2 of 2
Thread

Posts in chronological order

· Member since
[QUOTE] [b]Chief Mouse wrote:[/b]

I don't think this kind of footage usually gets cleaned. It's neither a movie nor a concert film or a music video. It's archive footage. The fact that they rescanned it in HD format is great already. Oh right. The DVD thing.[/QUOTE]

To me it seems even pointless to even transfer the footage in HD if you're not gonna put it on an HD format...But we hope for a future Blu-Ray release, maybe...

-Chin
Check out my channel for various goodies! :) http://www.youtube.com/user/Chinwonder2 Join us on the new forum here: http://queenforum.net/
· Member since
Thanks a lot!
· Member since
Thanks, Chief! Very cool as always!
· Member since
[QUOTE] [b]Dim wrote:[/b]

[QUOTE] [b]Chief Mouse wrote:[/b]

Thanks. Although I see why they wouldn't be bothered doing this. It takes a lot of time and is very expensive to hire a professional company for this.[/QUOTE]

They have contract with two major companies Hollywood records (Walt Disney group) and Universal records.... (Universal Group).
They don't have excuse.

Innuendo album cover was inspired by grandville who was inspiration to Walt Disney cartoon animal characters. Also the amimation of Days of our lifes was done by Walt Disney company.

[/QUOTE]

=======

And.. they pump millions in a Freddie movie, Loads of money in a 3D book etc and would not restore 35mm film shot in 1977s for a few grand??
You made us laugh, you made us cry, you made us feel like we could fly!
· Member since
[QUOTE] [b]Queenman!! wrote:[/b]

And.. they pump millions in a Freddie movie, Loads of money in a 3D book etc and would not restore 35mm film shot in 1977s for a few grand??

[/QUOTE]

Nope.

So we should just accept what they care about and what they don't. It's been pretty clear for years.
Queenzone is overrun with trolls and circling the drain - join us here instead: http://queenforum.net
· Member since
[QUOTE] [b]The Real Wizard wrote:[/b]

[QUOTE] [b]Queenman!! wrote:[/b]

And.. they pump millions in a Freddie movie, Loads of money in a 3D book etc and would not restore 35mm film shot in 1977s for a few grand??

[/QUOTE]

Nope.

So we should just accept what they care about and what they don't. It's been pretty clear for years.
[/QUOTE]

=========


First unbelieve and denial Bob; perhaps acceptation at a later stage
You made us laugh, you made us cry, you made us feel like we could fly!
· Member since
Thanks a lot!
This is the way those lazy QP should have done it...
· Member since
Chief better than Queen official xD
Queen are sucks xd
Enjoy! http://queenremixes-bykacio.blogspot.com/ http://youtube.com/KacioRMX http://www.lastfm.pl/user/Kacio94 http://vimeo.com/kacio94 http://queenphotos.wordpress.com/
· Member since
Chief better than Queen official xD
Queen are sucks xd
Enjoy! http://queenremixes-bykacio.blogspot.com/ http://youtube.com/KacioRMX http://www.lastfm.pl/user/Kacio94 http://vimeo.com/kacio94 http://queenphotos.wordpress.com/
· Member since
Are the blue scratches processed with PfClean's descratcher? Because it looks familiar, but better than my attempt :) Thanks for the share
Best of the best http://www.queenzone.com/forums/1109319/best-of-the-best.aspx?page=1
· Member since
[QUOTE] [b]Kacio wrote:[/b]

Chief better than Queen official xD
Queen are sucks xd[/QUOTE]

QPL sucks, not Queen (i.e. band from 1971-1991)
QUEEN EXPANDED COLLECTION: http://www.queenzone.com/forums/1456202/queen-expanded-studio-collection-cmi-music.aspx
· Member since
[QUOTE] [b]cmi wrote:[/b]

[QUOTE] [b]Kacio wrote:[/b]

Chief better than Queen official xD
Queen are sucks xd[/QUOTE]

QPL sucks, not Queen (i.e. band from 1971-1991)[/QUOTE]

Queen were a business/brand long before 1991.
Queenzone is overrun with trolls and circling the drain - join us here instead: http://queenforum.net
· Member since
Thanks a lot!!