Would it was better this way for Queen?

Rich Tea wrote:

Ha Ha its ok Dr Magnus I think Day dop has filled his boots big style. Day dop exactly what do you want me to address that I haven't already?

If by filling my boots, you mean answering up the nonsense you've come out with, then sure.
As for what you haven't addressed - the questions that I asked on my previous comment, obviously.

My main observation here is that this isn't the first time I've had a difference of opinion when it comes to Queen+ Lambert with "Vocal Harmony" then another account - in their "late 50s" (and also at the same time; 54 years of age, apparently) turns up sounding just the same and getting overly defensive.

Day dop wrote:




Btw, you're not another account belonging to Vocal Harmony, are you? I recall that account saying she was in her late 50s. And it seems odd both accounts sound very much the same.

I have one account and one name on here. I am not female, I have never claimed to be anyone else nor have I said what you are suggesting.,. . .

Get your facts right son

Tlr wrote:

earwig wrote:

I just think a small name change would've worked...
May, Taylor & Rodgers
May, Taylor & Lambert
Drop 'Queen' and everyone's happy?

Smile?

Close.


Maybe they could bookend their stage career with a band called "FROWN"

For one thing that'd be a hell of a concept for a late career bootleg. Maybe someone can get their SKYPES and release them. Adam singing something with Brian on acoustic.

Put in a good twenty minutes on "Frown" artwork with a smidge between the teeth instead of a sparkle, get a suitable Japanese plant to start pressing them at extravagant prices and sell it as the final QUEEN product

If i still had space to work on my old pc (with Photoshop) i could mock up a MIRACLE like cover with all three frowning (if one can find the photos) and sewn together

Day dop I think paranoia is setting in....

I have read your post and ok I said late 50's when I'm clearly mid 50's although feeling a lot older most of the time!! It is a minor error as for the rest of your post I think I have answered anything you have written quite clearly before I disagree with your opinion end of story, its just an opinion yet you seem to be the sort of person that cannot accept opinions are like arseholes we all have one and invariably they won't be the same.

Accusing me of being someone else, who I'm quite clearly not, just because they disagreed with your opinions in the past is crass and stupid just get over it and move on please.........

Rich Tea wrote:

Day dop I think paranoia is setting in....

I have read your post and ok I said late 50's when I'm clearly mid 50's although feeling a lot older most of the time!! It is a minor error as for the rest of your post I think I have answered anything you have written quite clearly before I disagree with your opinion end of story, its just an opinion yet you seem to be the sort of person that cannot accept opinions are like arseholes we all have one and invariably they won't be the same.

Accusing me of being someone else, who I'm quite clearly not, just because they disagreed with your opinions in the past is crass and stupid just get over it and move on please.........

So me mentioning my observation that 54 is not "late 50s" and that a similar thing happened last time 'vocal Harmony' and I disagreed is "paranoia setting in"? Well, no. And you have taken offence to my opinion and sound much the same. Last time, the other half of the exchange got deleted afterwards.

No. It's not paranoia whatsoever. I'm pointing out my observations, that is all. And yes, it seems quite peculiar.
Maybe you ought to look up the definition of the word? What I've observed and commented on makes me (by definition of the word 'paranoid') neither mentally ill, nor irrational. It's the same thing as last time - by someone sounding just the same, taking offence, and "in their late 50s" (or, 54 at the same time).

And once again, you didn't address what I said.

When you say "shame you operate this way", what exactly do you mean? It's a shame that I observe and comment on what I see?
(And why is it a shame?).

How is me commenting on what I see me trying to justify "crass remarks", speaking of which, what "crass remarks" are you speaking of?

And please stop coming out with nonsense such as "you seem to be the sort of person that cannot accept opinions" in order to deflect. And yes, I'll agree with "opinions are like arseholes we all have one". So why take offence so easily?
If you come out with nonsense, then I'll call you out on it. If you stop coming out with nonsense, then I won't.

But y'know, don't worry about answering what I've asked. We'll leave it at that. I would say in return that it's a shame you operate in such a way. Quite unnecessary.

I'm sorry but there you go again trying to make yourself look like the victim rather than the aggressor. Your paranoia seems to be with vocal Harmony I make one slip and you assume quite incorrectly that I am him although you think he is a she? I am completely lost at what I should be addressing however I will leave it at that now life's too short so here's looking forward to the News Of The World box set and especially my favourite song Who Needs You...............

Rich Tea wrote:

I'm sorry but there you go again trying to make yourself look like the victim rather than the aggressor. Your paranoia seems to be with vocal Harmony I make one slip and you assume quite incorrectly that I am him although you think he is a she? I am completely lost at what I should be addressing however I will leave it at that now life's too short so here's looking forward to the News Of The World box set and especially my favourite song Who Needs You...............

Don't be sorry to me for you misusing words.

As I previously wrote: "If you come out with nonsense, then I'll call you out on it. If you stop coming out with nonsense, then I won't"

Somehow though, you'e come to the weird conclusion that I'm "trying to make [myself] look like the victim rather than the aggressor"

And no, I have no issue with being the aggressor when I'm calling out bullshit (I don't see where I've tried to hide that).

Once again you're misusing the word "paranoia" too. You misusing the same word again doesn't make it any more true.
Like I said, I've made an observation and commented on what I see. That does not equate to paranoia. In order to be paranoid, it would have to be something other than amusing and inconsequential.
What's amusing is your reactions. First, getting overly defensive of Queen+ Lambert, then all your straw man arguments since.

As to what you could've instead addressed, you can read back through the exchange. It's there in plain English (y'know, the lines with question marks on the end that you didn't answer). But I've since said never mind about answering them. You'd only come out with more crap.

Day dop wrote:

Rich Tea wrote:

I'm sorry but there you go again trying to make yourself look like the victim rather than the aggressor. Your paranoia seems to be with vocal Harmony I make one slip and you assume quite incorrectly that I am him although you think he is a she? I am completely lost at what I should be addressing however I will leave it at that now life's too short so here's looking forward to the News Of The World box set and especially my favourite song Who Needs You...............

Don't be sorry to me for you misusing words.

As I previously wrote: "If you come out with nonsense, then I'll call you out on it. . . . . . You'd only come out with more crap.

Yet you don't reply when you are called out on your mistaken views. Admitting you were wrong is not in your remit but throwing unfounded accusations is. . .

I'm with Rich Tea on this. I think you have a problem that more than one person could share a similar view on a topic that doesn't agree with your line of thought.

Vocal harmony wrote:

Day dop wrote:

Rich Tea wrote:

I'm sorry but there you go again trying to make yourself look like the victim rather than the aggressor. Your paranoia seems to be with vocal Harmony I make one slip and you assume quite incorrectly that I am him although you think he is a she? I am completely lost at what I should be addressing however I will leave it at that now life's too short so here's looking forward to the News Of The World box set and especially my favourite song Who Needs You...............

Don't be sorry to me for you misusing words.

As I previously wrote: "If you come out with nonsense, then I'll call you out on it. . . . . . You'd only come out with more crap.

Yet you don't reply when you are called out on your mistaken views. Admitting you were wrong is not in your remit but throwing unfounded accusations is. . .

I'm with Rich Tea on this. I think you have a problem that more than one person could share a similar view on a topic that doesn't agree with your line of thought.

Except they're not unfounded accusations (it was actually a question and an observation).

And I think you'll find I've replied to every comment so far.

"More than one person". I see what you did there.

I think the issue here is, the typical Lambert fan mentality that no one with opposing views is supposed to speak up.

Not at all. But you have claimed that I am someone else. That I am female, that I have more than one account, all within the wording of your question.

Also you clearly state that you remember me saying I was in my late 50's.

None of this is true. You can remember what you like but it's not fact

Day Dope said "I think the issue here is, the typical Lambert fan mentality that no one with opposing views is supposed to speak up."

You really should read my posts my daughters maybe Lambert fans I am a Queen fan of 40+ years in my mid 50's who enjoys the shows with AL. Again read my posts I can't be arsed going back but a few posts back I said I respected your opinion but it wasn't mine or words along those lines you are the one who has resorted to an attitude of "my way or the high way" I suspect you are getting way more frustrated by this than I am as every post you have written reads like your opinion is the only one that matters and while I have clearly shown I will always compromise you clearly haven't shown me or others the same respect!!!