[QUOTE] [b]SweetCaroline wrote:[/b]
Why are you repeating what I just said about you? Don’t you have any original thoughts of your own?
[/QUOTE]
Touched a nerve, I take it. LOL?
Why do you repeat what others say, rather post and tweet?
Yep, I do have original thoughts of my own. You and snifflese were brats and worse in this thread. Has your views changed at all since this thread, or do you still want to go on and on bigging up AL and lusting over AL and how gorgeous you think he is?
[QUOTE] [b]Iron Butterfly wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]SweetCaroline wrote:[/b]
Why are you repeating what I just said about you? Don’t you have any original thoughts of your own?
[/QUOTE]
Touched a nerve, I take it. LOL?
Why do you repeat what others say, rather post and tweet?
Yep, I do have original thoughts of my own. You and snifflese were brats and worse in this thread. Has your views changed at all since this thread, or do you still want to go on and on bigging up AL and lusting over AL and how gorgeous you think he is?
[/QUOTE]
SmellyCaroline (Adam’s words, not mine) has yet to reply to the thread about obsessed/idiot/terrible Adam Worshippers.
For a lady who hates Trump and his supporters so much, SmellyCaroline surely acts as obsessed with Adam as Trump Worshippers are with Trump. They think their God’s are perfect. Adam could shit his pants on stage, she’d offer to clean his speedo... with bare hands!
That kind of worship is disgusting.
[QUOTE] [b]MisterCosmicc wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]Iron Butterfly wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]SweetCaroline wrote:[/b]
Why are you repeating what I just said about you? Don’t you have any original thoughts of your own?
[/QUOTE]
Touched a nerve, I take it. LOL?
Why do you repeat what others say, rather post and tweet?
Yep, I do have original thoughts of my own. You and snifflese were brats and worse in this thread. Has your views changed at all since this thread, or do you still want to go on and on bigging up AL and lusting over AL and how gorgeous you think he is?
[/QUOTE]
SmellyCaroline (Adam’s words, not mine) has yet to reply to the thread about obsessed/idiot/terrible Adam Worshippers.
For a lady who hates Trump and his supporters so much, SmellyCaroline surely acts as obsessed with Adam as Trump Worshippers are with Trump. They think their God’s are perfect. Adam could shit his pants on stage, she’d offer to clean his speedo... with bare hands!
That kind of worship is disgusting.
[/QUOTE]
It's an obsession... no matter if SweetCaroline "loves" or "hates" it's an obsession. She "loves" Lambert and she hates Trump...and even hates me, someone she hardly knows in the internet. Its really something.
She is so busy bigging up Lambert she didn't even realize the OP was tearing Freddie down to try to make AL look better and more important than Lambert was and will be in Queen's history. This thread is proof of how much she stock puts into AL's looks. This whole thread is proof of how extreme SweetCaroline and snifflese was and likely still is regarding all things Lambert. They are as bad as the troll who started this thread.
[QUOTE] [b]Freddie Jupiter wrote:[/b]
This thread is ridiculous. Crapbert can't even compete with John deacon in the vocals department according to a recent poll where over two thirds have voted in favour of Deacy.
Freddus was on a differnt plane altogether compared to that fat karaoke singer, always will be. End of story. [/QUOTE]
Half the people on here are ridiculous, the John/Adam thread was started by the newest most ridiculous and any actual Queen fan knows John didn't sing, say's it all really about the level of intelligence on here.
[QUOTE] [b]Freddie Jupiter wrote:[/b]
This thread is ridiculous. Crapbert can't even compete with John deacon in the vocals department according to a recent poll where over two thirds have voted in favour of Deacy.
Freddus was on a differnt plane altogether compared to that fat karaoke singer, always will be. End of story. [/QUOTE]
Trying to end something again because your on the loosing end.
Try this one for size.
Freddie, Brian , Roger and Adam Lambert have all sung lead vocals for Queen in front of thousands. Obviously John Deacon being such a brilliant singer did the same? so prove this to be fact or face the truth that your a trolling clown!
[QUOTE] [b]Freddie Jupiter wrote:[/b]
@vocal harmony, your argument is a non sequitur. [/QUOTE]
If that's all you've got after taking the time to present your somewhat strange views, you've obviously lost the argument.
[QUOTE] [b]Freddie Jupiter wrote:[/b]
This thread is ridiculous. Crapbert can't even compete with John deacon in the vocals department according to a recent poll where over two thirds have voted in favour of Deacy.
Freddus was on a differnt plane altogether compared to that fat karaoke singer, always will be. End of story. [/QUOTE]
You seem to rely on insults rather than facts, most of the time.
Maybe you should post a link to "the recent poll where two thirds voted in favour of Deacy. Maybe you'd like to quote figures ( actual numbers that took part). Until you do your claims are worthless and my assertion that Freddie Mercury, Brian May, Roger Taylor and Adam Lambert have all sung lead vocals forvQueen is proof enough that John Deacon does not have the vocal ability to sustain a lead vocal position or sustain your deluded argument.
Either way the historical facts prove you're wrong. I don't need to construct a stronger argument than that because of the level of foolishness and lack of knowledge I'm arguing against.
[QUOTE] [b]Freddie Jupiter wrote:[/b]
@vocal harmony, assertions made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. Nobody here has presented any evidence whatsoever and you expect me to give you a mathematical proof that for queen to finish their careers with crapbert would be going out on a low.
The poll where over two-thirds of the people here think that crapbert's vocals are worse that deacys is infintely more evidence to support what ive said than anything anybody else has presented to the contrary. But of course you won't accept it, so you'll just keep moving the goalposts until you completely exhaust me. I ain't playing that game. [/QUOTE]
You're the one quoting polls and opinions, I'm disagreeing. The way to change my mind is to display some kind of knowledge of the subject and prove that your claims are correct.
With out evidence you are presenting nothing.
If your quoted poll with its 70 percent figure was only answered by three people, or even 10 or 15 it means nothing on a site of 200 plus members. There are far more people on here who are not bothered by a subject that's is obviously a major thing to you.
Carry on trolling you are getting no where.
[QUOTE] [b]Freddie Jupiter wrote:[/b]
Yes and polls and opinions in this case is bona fide evidence, given that we are talking about whether fans percieve queen bowing out on a high, or on a low with crapbert.
If I were arguing about the size of Jupiter then opinions and polls would not support my claim. But when talking about perceptions of queen with crapbert they do. Does that make sense, or are you going to come up with some other piece of nonsense to obfuscate things and deflect from the central argument? [/QUOTE]
Queen will be bowing out on a high, the few naysayers won't matter one little bit, they'll keep on whining and no one will care. It's amusing you imagine a poll on Queenzone represents the wider perception of them and opinion of the fans when all evidence outside of here points to the exact opposite.
[QUOTE] [b]rockchic65 wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]Freddie Jupiter wrote:[/b]
Yes and polls and opinions in this case is bona fide evidence, given that we are talking about whether fans percieve queen bowing out on a high, or on a low with crapbert.
If I were arguing about the size of Jupiter then opinions and polls would not support my claim. But when talking about perceptions of queen with crapbert they do. Does that make sense, or are you going to come up with some other piece of nonsense to obfuscate things and deflect from the central argument? [/QUOTE]
Queen will be bowing out on a high, the few naysayers won't matter one little bit, they'll keep on whining and no one will care. It's amusing you imagine a poll on Queenzone represents the wider perception of them and opinion of the fans when all evidence outside of here points to the exact opposite.
[/QUOTE]
Based on Adam’s sales, his only fans belong on Queenzone, here in this section.
[QUOTE] [b]Freddie Jupiter wrote:[/b]
Yes and polls and opinions in this case is bona fide evidence, given that we are talking about whether fans percieve queen bowing out on a high, or on a low with crapbert.
If I were arguing about the size of Jupiter then opinions and polls would not support my claim. But when talking about perceptions of queen with crapbert they do. Does that make sense, or are you going to come up with some other piece of nonsense to obfuscate things and deflect from the central argument? [/QUOTE]
Careful about the poll, if the Glamberts notice it they will come just to vote on it.
[QUOTE] [b]Freddie Jupiter wrote:[/b]
Iron butterfly, I think every single lamber fan already voted on it. Given his album sales I think 22 people is about right. [/QUOTE]
Some Glamberts can't resist a poll. If some get wind of it, they will be here voting on it.
[QUOTE] [b]Freddie Jupiter wrote:[/b]
Iron butterfly, I think every single lamber fan already voted on it. Given his album sales I think 22 people is about right. [/QUOTE]
Well I sure didn't vote on a poll comparing Adam with a guy who admitted he couldn't sing and didn't sing but then I'm not an idiot, only an idiot would have thought up said poll in the first place.
[QUOTE] [b]Freddie Jupiter wrote:[/b]
@rock chick, I don't believe you. You were hitting that Adam lambert radio button quicker than anything.[/QUOTE]
You must be fkn joking if you think I'd bother to vote on that pathetic drivel, I don't pander to children and you seem like you're all of 10 years old at most.
[QUOTE] [b]Freddie Jupiter wrote:[/b]
10 year olds with damn good tastes in music and enough perspicacity and common sense to see that that magical, almost intangible aura is no longer there. The whole affair smacks of two old man playing with a glorified karaoke singer. [/QUOTE]
To you maybe and that's fine but you clearly aren't an adult if you can't see that for others the magic is still there and they're having a blast. No one says everyone should like it but to dismiss it out of hand and claim it's crap just because you don't like it is childish in the extreme.
