For anyone who hasn’t seen this before (not you, Icy):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cc0u1sUUnNM&app=desktop
SweetCaroline
Thread
Posts in chronological order
Iron Butterfly
I don't get why you would post that in the first place. Must be a slow news day in AL/sweetcaroline lala land, LOL.
Stick
Laughed a lot tonight while reading this thread. This sweetcaroline seems to have the same mental affliction as that cnb creature on queenonline. who is just as blind to her own words and actions as this one here. Are they the same creature or is this a Glambert thing/ They both provide a lot of entertainment but it's still sad to see people, who clearly have a very blurred and biased view of themselves, so convinced that what they are posting is a rational argument when everybody else can see that it doesn't even come close. So many people in general never had that part of them properly developed but are still babbling away on forums or in public. Of course, when they hang around people who are just as under developed in this area, they have no reason to notice it. But I keep wondering, with all those official video debates on topics of religion or whatever where highly skilled debaters are presented, why don't they notice that their way of thinking and talking about things and forming "opinions" is clearly atrocious when compared to the way these debaters/researchers go about it. Kuddos to bullet with butterfly wings for clearly being better at this type of thing than sweetcaroline. It just oozes out of her posts. Not always but a hell of a lot more than others.
I guess most people are just (deliberately) blind to their own way of going about things out of sheer arrogance or fear of self-confrontation. Also, children can do it, so at what age do most of us lose this functionality and become stuck in our ways without a chance of improvement? It's like watching a dog trying to get a very large stick through the door, try as it might it will never understand why it doesn't work. Breaks your heart doesn't it?
I guess most people are just (deliberately) blind to their own way of going about things out of sheer arrogance or fear of self-confrontation. Also, children can do it, so at what age do most of us lose this functionality and become stuck in our ways without a chance of improvement? It's like watching a dog trying to get a very large stick through the door, try as it might it will never understand why it doesn't work. Breaks your heart doesn't it?
Iron Butterfly
[QUOTE] [b]Stick wrote:[/b]
Laughed a lot tonight while reading this thread. This sweetcaroline seems to have the same mental affliction as that cnb creature on queenonline. who is just as blind to her own words and actions as this one here. Are they the same creature or is this a Glambert thing/ They both provide a lot of entertainment but it's still sad to see people, who clearly have a very blurred and biased view of themselves, so convinced that what they are posting is a rational argument when everybody else can see that it doesn't even come close. So many people in general never had that part of them properly developed but are still babbling away on forums or in public. Of course, when they hang around people who are just as under developed in this area, they have no reason to notice it. But I keep wondering, with all those official video debates on topics of religion or whatever where highly skilled debaters are presented, why don't they notice that their way of thinking and talking about things and forming "opinions" is clearly atrocious when compared to the way these debaters/researchers go about it. Kuddos to bullet with butterfly wings for clearly being better at this type of thing than sweetcaroline. It just oozes out of her posts. Not always but a hell of a lot more than others.
I guess most people are just (deliberately) blind to their own way of going about things out of sheer arrogance or fear of self-confrontation. Also, children can do it, so at what age do most of us lose this functionality and become stuck in our ways without a chance of improvement? It's like watching a dog trying to get a very large stick through the door, try as it might it will never understand why it doesn't work. Breaks your heart doesn't it?[/QUOTE]
They are the one and the same ;-).
Very well said in your post. Absolutely agree with it.
Laughed a lot tonight while reading this thread. This sweetcaroline seems to have the same mental affliction as that cnb creature on queenonline. who is just as blind to her own words and actions as this one here. Are they the same creature or is this a Glambert thing/ They both provide a lot of entertainment but it's still sad to see people, who clearly have a very blurred and biased view of themselves, so convinced that what they are posting is a rational argument when everybody else can see that it doesn't even come close. So many people in general never had that part of them properly developed but are still babbling away on forums or in public. Of course, when they hang around people who are just as under developed in this area, they have no reason to notice it. But I keep wondering, with all those official video debates on topics of religion or whatever where highly skilled debaters are presented, why don't they notice that their way of thinking and talking about things and forming "opinions" is clearly atrocious when compared to the way these debaters/researchers go about it. Kuddos to bullet with butterfly wings for clearly being better at this type of thing than sweetcaroline. It just oozes out of her posts. Not always but a hell of a lot more than others.
I guess most people are just (deliberately) blind to their own way of going about things out of sheer arrogance or fear of self-confrontation. Also, children can do it, so at what age do most of us lose this functionality and become stuck in our ways without a chance of improvement? It's like watching a dog trying to get a very large stick through the door, try as it might it will never understand why it doesn't work. Breaks your heart doesn't it?[/QUOTE]
They are the one and the same ;-).
Very well said in your post. Absolutely agree with it.
MisterCosmicc
[QUOTE] [b]snifflese wrote:[/b]
I think she is being sarcastic!! Yea, what is wrong with good looks? That is part of the whole package of a star usually (there are exceptions!!). If you have a musical ability, personality and are easy on the eyes, I would say that your chances are greater at being successful than an ugly individual. It applies in most aspects of life. Tall businessmen with a lot of hair and good looks are hired over ugly dudes. Hot women often get a job over their ugly step sister. That is just an unfortunate reality of life!
The Voice bases its show on the fact that looks are not going to impact their decision as to who could be a Star, so it is pretty generally recognized that good lookers find the star at the end of the day. Look at the movie idols (Elvis, Gregory Peck, Brad Pitt, etc, etc). I doubt Elvis would have gotten where he was without his looks. It applies nowadays also, maybe not as much as there are a few homely singers (not mentioning names), but it is an advantage to be sexy and hot! I will be honest, I would prefer to look at someone really nice looking at a show than a really ugly person. If that makes me shallow, oh well.
I always loved Roger and Brian when I was young as they were dreamy. Freddie I found off putting, not just because of his looks, but his stage persona. I will never forget those white shorts and his strutting around the stage half naked, screaming and brandishing the mic. It was just too much for me. It seems a lot of the early Queen fans were dudes and they could care less about looks or being macho, so Freddie appealed greatly to them. To me not so much! I think nowadays there seem to be a lot more women as new fans and they must be shallow just like me. They seem to appreciate Adam for his singing prowess and being hot doesn't hurt!!
All kidding aside, Adam is appreciated mainly for the voice. I have read thousands of individual reviews and newspaper reviews and it is mainly about his voice. I think that is what Caroline really means, but hey, being good looking doesn't hurt. It just might seal the deal!! [/QUOTE]
Holy fuck
I think she is being sarcastic!! Yea, what is wrong with good looks? That is part of the whole package of a star usually (there are exceptions!!). If you have a musical ability, personality and are easy on the eyes, I would say that your chances are greater at being successful than an ugly individual. It applies in most aspects of life. Tall businessmen with a lot of hair and good looks are hired over ugly dudes. Hot women often get a job over their ugly step sister. That is just an unfortunate reality of life!
The Voice bases its show on the fact that looks are not going to impact their decision as to who could be a Star, so it is pretty generally recognized that good lookers find the star at the end of the day. Look at the movie idols (Elvis, Gregory Peck, Brad Pitt, etc, etc). I doubt Elvis would have gotten where he was without his looks. It applies nowadays also, maybe not as much as there are a few homely singers (not mentioning names), but it is an advantage to be sexy and hot! I will be honest, I would prefer to look at someone really nice looking at a show than a really ugly person. If that makes me shallow, oh well.
I always loved Roger and Brian when I was young as they were dreamy. Freddie I found off putting, not just because of his looks, but his stage persona. I will never forget those white shorts and his strutting around the stage half naked, screaming and brandishing the mic. It was just too much for me. It seems a lot of the early Queen fans were dudes and they could care less about looks or being macho, so Freddie appealed greatly to them. To me not so much! I think nowadays there seem to be a lot more women as new fans and they must be shallow just like me. They seem to appreciate Adam for his singing prowess and being hot doesn't hurt!!
All kidding aside, Adam is appreciated mainly for the voice. I have read thousands of individual reviews and newspaper reviews and it is mainly about his voice. I think that is what Caroline really means, but hey, being good looking doesn't hurt. It just might seal the deal!! [/QUOTE]
Holy fuck
Iron Butterfly
[QUOTE] [b]MisterCosmicc wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]snifflese wrote:[/b]
I think she is being sarcastic!! Yea, what is wrong with good looks? That is part of the whole package of a star usually (there are exceptions!!). If you have a musical ability, personality and are easy on the eyes, I would say that your chances are greater at being successful than an ugly individual. It applies in most aspects of life. Tall businessmen with a lot of hair and good looks are hired over ugly dudes. Hot women often get a job over their ugly step sister. That is just an unfortunate reality of life!
The Voice bases its show on the fact that looks are not going to impact their decision as to who could be a Star, so it is pretty generally recognized that good lookers find the star at the end of the day. Look at the movie idols (Elvis, Gregory Peck, Brad Pitt, etc, etc). I doubt Elvis would have gotten where he was without his looks. It applies nowadays also, maybe not as much as there are a few homely singers (not mentioning names), but it is an advantage to be sexy and hot! I will be honest, I would prefer to look at someone really nice looking at a show than a really ugly person. If that makes me shallow, oh well.
I always loved Roger and Brian when I was young as they were dreamy. Freddie I found off putting, not just because of his looks, but his stage persona. I will never forget those white shorts and his strutting around the stage half naked, screaming and brandishing the mic. It was just too much for me. It seems a lot of the early Queen fans were dudes and they could care less about looks or being macho, so Freddie appealed greatly to them. To me not so much! I think nowadays there seem to be a lot more women as new fans and they must be shallow just like me. They seem to appreciate Adam for his singing prowess and being hot doesn't hurt!!
All kidding aside, Adam is appreciated mainly for the voice. I have read thousands of individual reviews and newspaper reviews and it is mainly about his voice. I think that is what Caroline really means, but hey, being good looking doesn't hurt. It just might seal the deal!! [/QUOTE]
Holy fuck
[/QUOTE]
#Glambertlogicfail.
[QUOTE] [b]snifflese wrote:[/b]
I think she is being sarcastic!! Yea, what is wrong with good looks? That is part of the whole package of a star usually (there are exceptions!!). If you have a musical ability, personality and are easy on the eyes, I would say that your chances are greater at being successful than an ugly individual. It applies in most aspects of life. Tall businessmen with a lot of hair and good looks are hired over ugly dudes. Hot women often get a job over their ugly step sister. That is just an unfortunate reality of life!
The Voice bases its show on the fact that looks are not going to impact their decision as to who could be a Star, so it is pretty generally recognized that good lookers find the star at the end of the day. Look at the movie idols (Elvis, Gregory Peck, Brad Pitt, etc, etc). I doubt Elvis would have gotten where he was without his looks. It applies nowadays also, maybe not as much as there are a few homely singers (not mentioning names), but it is an advantage to be sexy and hot! I will be honest, I would prefer to look at someone really nice looking at a show than a really ugly person. If that makes me shallow, oh well.
I always loved Roger and Brian when I was young as they were dreamy. Freddie I found off putting, not just because of his looks, but his stage persona. I will never forget those white shorts and his strutting around the stage half naked, screaming and brandishing the mic. It was just too much for me. It seems a lot of the early Queen fans were dudes and they could care less about looks or being macho, so Freddie appealed greatly to them. To me not so much! I think nowadays there seem to be a lot more women as new fans and they must be shallow just like me. They seem to appreciate Adam for his singing prowess and being hot doesn't hurt!!
All kidding aside, Adam is appreciated mainly for the voice. I have read thousands of individual reviews and newspaper reviews and it is mainly about his voice. I think that is what Caroline really means, but hey, being good looking doesn't hurt. It just might seal the deal!! [/QUOTE]
Holy fuck
[/QUOTE]
#Glambertlogicfail.
MisterCosmicc
[QUOTE] [b]Iron Butterfly wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]MisterCosmicc wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]snifflese wrote:[/b]
I think she is being sarcastic!! Yea, what is wrong with good looks? That is part of the whole package of a star usually (there are exceptions!!). If you have a musical ability, personality and are easy on the eyes, I would say that your chances are greater at being successful than an ugly individual. It applies in most aspects of life. Tall businessmen with a lot of hair and good looks are hired over ugly dudes. Hot women often get a job over their ugly step sister. That is just an unfortunate reality of life!
The Voice bases its show on the fact that looks are not going to impact their decision as to who could be a Star, so it is pretty generally recognized that good lookers find the star at the end of the day. Look at the movie idols (Elvis, Gregory Peck, Brad Pitt, etc, etc). I doubt Elvis would have gotten where he was without his looks. It applies nowadays also, maybe not as much as there are a few homely singers (not mentioning names), but it is an advantage to be sexy and hot! I will be honest, I would prefer to look at someone really nice looking at a show than a really ugly person. If that makes me shallow, oh well.
I always loved Roger and Brian when I was young as they were dreamy. Freddie I found off putting, not just because of his looks, but his stage persona. I will never forget those white shorts and his strutting around the stage half naked, screaming and brandishing the mic. It was just too much for me. It seems a lot of the early Queen fans were dudes and they could care less about looks or being macho, so Freddie appealed greatly to them. To me not so much! I think nowadays there seem to be a lot more women as new fans and they must be shallow just like me. They seem to appreciate Adam for his singing prowess and being hot doesn't hurt!!
All kidding aside, Adam is appreciated mainly for the voice. I have read thousands of individual reviews and newspaper reviews and it is mainly about his voice. I think that is what Caroline really means, but hey, being good looking doesn't hurt. It just might seal the deal!! [/QUOTE]
Holy fuck
[/QUOTE]
#Glambertlogicfail.
[/QUOTE]
SweetCaroline acted like a pathetic, useless moron on here, and Sniffy’s replies to you were as pathetic as SweetCaroline’s posts. I saw no bullying... SweetCaroline’s idiocy deserved to be noticed.
[QUOTE] [b]MisterCosmicc wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]snifflese wrote:[/b]
I think she is being sarcastic!! Yea, what is wrong with good looks? That is part of the whole package of a star usually (there are exceptions!!). If you have a musical ability, personality and are easy on the eyes, I would say that your chances are greater at being successful than an ugly individual. It applies in most aspects of life. Tall businessmen with a lot of hair and good looks are hired over ugly dudes. Hot women often get a job over their ugly step sister. That is just an unfortunate reality of life!
The Voice bases its show on the fact that looks are not going to impact their decision as to who could be a Star, so it is pretty generally recognized that good lookers find the star at the end of the day. Look at the movie idols (Elvis, Gregory Peck, Brad Pitt, etc, etc). I doubt Elvis would have gotten where he was without his looks. It applies nowadays also, maybe not as much as there are a few homely singers (not mentioning names), but it is an advantage to be sexy and hot! I will be honest, I would prefer to look at someone really nice looking at a show than a really ugly person. If that makes me shallow, oh well.
I always loved Roger and Brian when I was young as they were dreamy. Freddie I found off putting, not just because of his looks, but his stage persona. I will never forget those white shorts and his strutting around the stage half naked, screaming and brandishing the mic. It was just too much for me. It seems a lot of the early Queen fans were dudes and they could care less about looks or being macho, so Freddie appealed greatly to them. To me not so much! I think nowadays there seem to be a lot more women as new fans and they must be shallow just like me. They seem to appreciate Adam for his singing prowess and being hot doesn't hurt!!
All kidding aside, Adam is appreciated mainly for the voice. I have read thousands of individual reviews and newspaper reviews and it is mainly about his voice. I think that is what Caroline really means, but hey, being good looking doesn't hurt. It just might seal the deal!! [/QUOTE]
Holy fuck
[/QUOTE]
#Glambertlogicfail.
[/QUOTE]
SweetCaroline acted like a pathetic, useless moron on here, and Sniffy’s replies to you were as pathetic as SweetCaroline’s posts. I saw no bullying... SweetCaroline’s idiocy deserved to be noticed.
Saint Jiub
[QUOTE] [b]snifflese wrote:[/b]
Freddie I found off putting, not just because of his looks, but his stage persona. I will never forget those white shorts and his strutting around the stage half naked, screaming and brandishing the mic. It was just too much for me. [/QUOTE]
... as spoken by someone who gives lip service as to being a Queen fan ...
Freddie I found off putting, not just because of his looks, but his stage persona. I will never forget those white shorts and his strutting around the stage half naked, screaming and brandishing the mic. It was just too much for me. [/QUOTE]
... as spoken by someone who gives lip service as to being a Queen fan ...
Iron Butterfly
[QUOTE] [b]Saint Jiub wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]snifflese wrote:[/b]
Freddie I found off putting, not just because of his looks, but his stage persona. I will never forget those white shorts and his strutting around the stage half naked, screaming and brandishing the mic. It was just too much for me. [/QUOTE]
... as spoken by someone who gives lip service as to being a Queen fan ...[/QUOTE]
Exactly. Boy, snifflese has tripped over herself here. This whole thread is a great example of how bitter she is, even about Freddie. Theres is no way she's a fan.
Why do snifflese and SweetCaroline clutch their pearls about Freddie’s short shorts?
[QUOTE] [b]snifflese wrote:[/b]
Freddie I found off putting, not just because of his looks, but his stage persona. I will never forget those white shorts and his strutting around the stage half naked, screaming and brandishing the mic. It was just too much for me. [/QUOTE]
... as spoken by someone who gives lip service as to being a Queen fan ...[/QUOTE]
Exactly. Boy, snifflese has tripped over herself here. This whole thread is a great example of how bitter she is, even about Freddie. Theres is no way she's a fan.
Why do snifflese and SweetCaroline clutch their pearls about Freddie’s short shorts?
Iron Butterfly
[QUOTE] [b]MisterCosmicc wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]Iron Butterfly wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]MisterCosmicc wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]snifflese wrote:[/b]
I think she is being sarcastic!! Yea, what is wrong with good looks? That is part of the whole package of a star usually (there are exceptions!!). If you have a musical ability, personality and are easy on the eyes, I would say that your chances are greater at being successful than an ugly individual. It applies in most aspects of life. Tall businessmen with a lot of hair and good looks are hired over ugly dudes. Hot women often get a job over their ugly step sister. That is just an unfortunate reality of life!
The Voice bases its show on the fact that looks are not going to impact their decision as to who could be a Star, so it is pretty generally recognized that good lookers find the star at the end of the day. Look at the movie idols (Elvis, Gregory Peck, Brad Pitt, etc, etc). I doubt Elvis would have gotten where he was without his looks. It applies nowadays also, maybe not as much as there are a few homely singers (not mentioning names), but it is an advantage to be sexy and hot! I will be honest, I would prefer to look at someone really nice looking at a show than a really ugly person. If that makes me shallow, oh well.
I always loved Roger and Brian when I was young as they were dreamy. Freddie I found off putting, not just because of his looks, but his stage persona. I will never forget those white shorts and his strutting around the stage half naked, screaming and brandishing the mic. It was just too much for me. It seems a lot of the early Queen fans were dudes and they could care less about looks or being macho, so Freddie appealed greatly to them. To me not so much! I think nowadays there seem to be a lot more women as new fans and they must be shallow just like me. They seem to appreciate Adam for his singing prowess and being hot doesn't hurt!!
All kidding aside, Adam is appreciated mainly for the voice. I have read thousands of individual reviews and newspaper reviews and it is mainly about his voice. I think that is what Caroline really means, but hey, being good looking doesn't hurt. It just might seal the deal!! [/QUOTE]
Holy fuck
[/QUOTE]
#Glambertlogicfail.
[/QUOTE]
SweetCaroline acted like a pathetic, useless moron on here, and Sniffy’s replies to you were as pathetic as SweetCaroline’s posts. I saw no bullying... SweetCaroline’s idiocy deserved to be noticed.
[/QUOTE]
Snifflese likes to claim bullying. Gotta defend SweetCaroline and big up Lambert and to have a go at me, that's why she is here.
Reading this thread again is eye opening. Do SweetCaroline and snifflese really think they help AL in any way, shape or form? Deluded sparkle cows.
[QUOTE] [b]Iron Butterfly wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]MisterCosmicc wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]snifflese wrote:[/b]
I think she is being sarcastic!! Yea, what is wrong with good looks? That is part of the whole package of a star usually (there are exceptions!!). If you have a musical ability, personality and are easy on the eyes, I would say that your chances are greater at being successful than an ugly individual. It applies in most aspects of life. Tall businessmen with a lot of hair and good looks are hired over ugly dudes. Hot women often get a job over their ugly step sister. That is just an unfortunate reality of life!
The Voice bases its show on the fact that looks are not going to impact their decision as to who could be a Star, so it is pretty generally recognized that good lookers find the star at the end of the day. Look at the movie idols (Elvis, Gregory Peck, Brad Pitt, etc, etc). I doubt Elvis would have gotten where he was without his looks. It applies nowadays also, maybe not as much as there are a few homely singers (not mentioning names), but it is an advantage to be sexy and hot! I will be honest, I would prefer to look at someone really nice looking at a show than a really ugly person. If that makes me shallow, oh well.
I always loved Roger and Brian when I was young as they were dreamy. Freddie I found off putting, not just because of his looks, but his stage persona. I will never forget those white shorts and his strutting around the stage half naked, screaming and brandishing the mic. It was just too much for me. It seems a lot of the early Queen fans were dudes and they could care less about looks or being macho, so Freddie appealed greatly to them. To me not so much! I think nowadays there seem to be a lot more women as new fans and they must be shallow just like me. They seem to appreciate Adam for his singing prowess and being hot doesn't hurt!!
All kidding aside, Adam is appreciated mainly for the voice. I have read thousands of individual reviews and newspaper reviews and it is mainly about his voice. I think that is what Caroline really means, but hey, being good looking doesn't hurt. It just might seal the deal!! [/QUOTE]
Holy fuck
[/QUOTE]
#Glambertlogicfail.
[/QUOTE]
SweetCaroline acted like a pathetic, useless moron on here, and Sniffy’s replies to you were as pathetic as SweetCaroline’s posts. I saw no bullying... SweetCaroline’s idiocy deserved to be noticed.
[/QUOTE]
Snifflese likes to claim bullying. Gotta defend SweetCaroline and big up Lambert and to have a go at me, that's why she is here.
Reading this thread again is eye opening. Do SweetCaroline and snifflese really think they help AL in any way, shape or form? Deluded sparkle cows.
Saint Jiub
[QUOTE] [b]Iron Butterfly wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]Saint Jiub wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]snifflese wrote:[/b]
Freddie I found off putting, not just because of his looks, but his stage persona. I will never forget those white shorts and his strutting around the stage half naked, screaming and brandishing the mic. It was just too much for me. [/QUOTE]
... as spoken by someone who gives lip service as to being a Queen fan ...[/QUOTE]
Exactly. Boy, snifflese has tried over herself here.
Why do snifflese and SweetCaroline clutch their pearls about Freddie’s short shorts? [/QUOTE]
Because they are centrarians and conservative christians??
[QUOTE] [b]Saint Jiub wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]snifflese wrote:[/b]
Freddie I found off putting, not just because of his looks, but his stage persona. I will never forget those white shorts and his strutting around the stage half naked, screaming and brandishing the mic. It was just too much for me. [/QUOTE]
... as spoken by someone who gives lip service as to being a Queen fan ...[/QUOTE]
Exactly. Boy, snifflese has tried over herself here.
Why do snifflese and SweetCaroline clutch their pearls about Freddie’s short shorts? [/QUOTE]
Because they are centrarians and conservative christians??
Iron Butterfly
[QUOTE] [b]Saint Jiub wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]Iron Butterfly wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]Saint Jiub wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]snifflese wrote:[/b]
Freddie I found off putting, not just because of his looks, but his stage persona. I will never forget those white shorts and his strutting around the stage half naked, screaming and brandishing the mic. It was just too much for me. [/QUOTE]
... as spoken by someone who gives lip service as to being a Queen fan ...[/QUOTE]
Exactly. Boy, snifflese has tried over herself here.
Why do snifflese and SweetCaroline clutch their pearls about Freddie’s short shorts? [/QUOTE]
Because they are centrarians and conservative christians??[/QUOTE]
Maybe SweetCaroline will pray for me again LOL.
I think it's likely they won't stop at nothing to big AL up even at the expense of Freddie...on Queen boards. Idiots the both of them.
[QUOTE] [b]Iron Butterfly wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]Saint Jiub wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]snifflese wrote:[/b]
Freddie I found off putting, not just because of his looks, but his stage persona. I will never forget those white shorts and his strutting around the stage half naked, screaming and brandishing the mic. It was just too much for me. [/QUOTE]
... as spoken by someone who gives lip service as to being a Queen fan ...[/QUOTE]
Exactly. Boy, snifflese has tried over herself here.
Why do snifflese and SweetCaroline clutch their pearls about Freddie’s short shorts? [/QUOTE]
Because they are centrarians and conservative christians??[/QUOTE]
Maybe SweetCaroline will pray for me again LOL.
I think it's likely they won't stop at nothing to big AL up even at the expense of Freddie...on Queen boards. Idiots the both of them.
SweetCaroline
Amazing how much people are missing the QAL concerts during this break. So much so that they are bringing back chat threads from three and even six years ago about how SC and Sniffy hate Freddie and are bigging up Adam! Same old same old.
Iron Butterfly
[QUOTE] [b]SweetCaroline wrote:[/b]
Amazing how much people are missing the QAL concerts during this break. So much so that they are bringing back chat threads from three and even six years ago about how SC and Sniffy hate Freddie and are bigging up Adam! Same old same old.
[/QUOTE]
Why? Embarrassed by the crap you and snifflese had posted in this thread so you want to try to deflect...that's exactly what it seems like you are doing. You and snifflese were both fools in this thread, much like the troll who started this thread. What you and snifflese have both said about AL even at the expense of Freddie, is eye opening, it shows how entitled you both were...and still are.
You must be missing the tour and spamming about Lambert, Iguess you don't dare discuss Freddie or Queen in the meantime, eh.
Amazing how much people are missing the QAL concerts during this break. So much so that they are bringing back chat threads from three and even six years ago about how SC and Sniffy hate Freddie and are bigging up Adam! Same old same old.
[/QUOTE]
Why? Embarrassed by the crap you and snifflese had posted in this thread so you want to try to deflect...that's exactly what it seems like you are doing. You and snifflese were both fools in this thread, much like the troll who started this thread. What you and snifflese have both said about AL even at the expense of Freddie, is eye opening, it shows how entitled you both were...and still are.
You must be missing the tour and spamming about Lambert, Iguess you don't dare discuss Freddie or Queen in the meantime, eh.
SweetCaroline
Why are you repeating what I just said about you? Don’t you have any original thoughts of your own?