runner_70
SOmeone who is praising lamebird must have almost zero braincells as well ;)
Thread
Posts in chronological order
Sealion
@snifflise
There is no sense in talking to the runner. Everybody on Queen‘s Facebook page or the German Fanclub forum knows that.
He‘s only a troll.
I didn’t know about the fake profile and I would never say doing something like that is OK. BUT I had to chuckle after hearing that: the biggest troll I‘ve met on the internet is trolled by someone else... I think in a way it’s completely deserved. And like rockchick said: He trolls Queen-Fans, who go to the gigs, Roger and Brian almost as much as AL or any AL-fan.
No chance to say, who set up the fake-account.
There is no sense in talking to the runner. Everybody on Queen‘s Facebook page or the German Fanclub forum knows that.
He‘s only a troll.
I didn’t know about the fake profile and I would never say doing something like that is OK. BUT I had to chuckle after hearing that: the biggest troll I‘ve met on the internet is trolled by someone else... I think in a way it’s completely deserved. And like rockchick said: He trolls Queen-Fans, who go to the gigs, Roger and Brian almost as much as AL or any AL-fan.
No chance to say, who set up the fake-account.
runner_70
Glambert logic: Everyone who hates the goat is a troll *rollseyes*. And we don't "get him. Funny stuff
snifflese
No, you can have an opinion and you are welcome to it, but saying it 100 times and being so crude about it is quite another thing! That is a troll and you fit the bill perfectly!!
runner_70
One cannot be crude enough when it comes to Lamefart
Vocal harmony
^^^ One can not be stupid enough, if you're you!
Iron Butterfly
[QUOTE] [b]Sealion wrote:[/b]
@snifflise
There is no sense in talking to the runner. Everybody on Queen‘s Facebook page or the German Fanclub forum knows that.
He‘s only a troll.
I didn’t know about the fake profile and I would never say doing something like that is OK. BUT I had to chuckle after hearing that: the biggest troll I‘ve met on the internet is trolled by someone else... I think in a way it’s completely deserved. And like rockchick said: He trolls Queen-Fans, who go to the gigs, Roger and Brian almost as much as AL or any AL-fan.
No chance to say, who set up the fake-account.[/QUOTE]
Nope, not deserved at all. If you are on social media would you want your page stolen and copied? Facebook tends to crack down on things like that.
If what he says bothers some people that much, ignoring him would be more reasonable.
@snifflise
There is no sense in talking to the runner. Everybody on Queen‘s Facebook page or the German Fanclub forum knows that.
He‘s only a troll.
I didn’t know about the fake profile and I would never say doing something like that is OK. BUT I had to chuckle after hearing that: the biggest troll I‘ve met on the internet is trolled by someone else... I think in a way it’s completely deserved. And like rockchick said: He trolls Queen-Fans, who go to the gigs, Roger and Brian almost as much as AL or any AL-fan.
No chance to say, who set up the fake-account.[/QUOTE]
Nope, not deserved at all. If you are on social media would you want your page stolen and copied? Facebook tends to crack down on things like that.
If what he says bothers some people that much, ignoring him would be more reasonable.
Iron Butterfly
I actually love Roger's tattoos...but if his leg is covered, that must've hurt.
Hmm, maybe Roger and AL have rubbed of each other in the tattoo department.
Hmm, maybe Roger and AL have rubbed of each other in the tattoo department.
Sealion
I don’t think, they rubbed off, but I can see them discussing tattoos. Roger has covered his right arm and I think both of his legs almost completely. Haven’t seen the left arm for some time and don‘t know of the body-parts, that are always covered. ;-) Personally I don’t like his tattoos, because they are too colorful and make him look like a parrot. But if he likes it...
AL‘s tats look very different in style. And just from looking at the pic posted above, he‘s less tats than Roger, because his legs look clean. But hey, he‘s still much more time to cover his canvas...
AL‘s tats look very different in style. And just from looking at the pic posted above, he‘s less tats than Roger, because his legs look clean. But hey, he‘s still much more time to cover his canvas...
runner_70
Parrott is very fitting to his singer-maybe thats the reason why. I think ROger has completely lost it. Getting completely inked at a,most 70 is just plain ridiculous (as the choice of this "tool" as a singer)
Ken8
Don't give these haters oxygen
runner_70
Stumbled upon a FB posting from Linda Jakubowski (dont know if she is on ehre) who sums up my feelings about QAL 110%.:
".....to be fair Paul Rogers is a venerated singer in his own right. AL, I agree, is not my cup of tea. He is constantly trying to be more outrageous than Freddie, and it falls flat in my eyes. When I saw him live, his shenanigans made me squirm with embarrassment for him. I cannot watch him on you tube for the same reason. The funny thing is I never felt that way about Freddie. With Freddie, he just did what he wanted. He was not contrived. I often wonder would Led Zep have replaced Robert Plant? And what would their fans have said? I am always surprised at the people who defend Roger and Brian. But again, they have every right to do it, and, again, years from now this travesty will be forgotten, and Freddie with Queen will be the incarnation remembered. Again, my opinion, only! Which last time I looked I was allowed to express."
Spot on ! Nothing left to say
".....to be fair Paul Rogers is a venerated singer in his own right. AL, I agree, is not my cup of tea. He is constantly trying to be more outrageous than Freddie, and it falls flat in my eyes. When I saw him live, his shenanigans made me squirm with embarrassment for him. I cannot watch him on you tube for the same reason. The funny thing is I never felt that way about Freddie. With Freddie, he just did what he wanted. He was not contrived. I often wonder would Led Zep have replaced Robert Plant? And what would their fans have said? I am always surprised at the people who defend Roger and Brian. But again, they have every right to do it, and, again, years from now this travesty will be forgotten, and Freddie with Queen will be the incarnation remembered. Again, my opinion, only! Which last time I looked I was allowed to express."
Spot on ! Nothing left to say
Sealion
Sealion
LOL! What you call „the biggest mistake in rock-history“ sells out venues around the globe. They can’t even meet all the demand. And besides that, they and the audiences look completely, if you ask me.
I‘m sure, most people won‘t call this a mistake. Most bands would even be more than happy, if they were able to do that mistake. I‘m just happy and thankful, to be able to see and hear them live!
I‘m sure, most people won‘t call this a mistake. Most bands would even be more than happy, if they were able to do that mistake. I‘m just happy and thankful, to be able to see and hear them live!
runner_70
The question of the topic itself is stupid. Lamebird is a plastic dance artist and has no connection to rock music. that shows in his underwhelming performances where he destroys rocks songs each time he tries one. The worst ever must be his "Whole lotta love "version. I have never heard anything worse than that in my entire life. Absolutely disgusting. look for it on youtube. Funny how the Glamberts bring this up as an example of how great the parrott is. My gosh - how delusional can you get??????