Clothing geared for he him she her ma'am and shim.
Daisy duke short shorts *(jeans)
Half shirts cut and tied at front
For females, belts with dangling front simulated male genitalia
Double sided dildos with each band members face as the tip (*COLLECT ALL FOUR! !!)
WHY NOT BE FORTHRIGHT? WHY NOT PANDER?
NOW IS THE TIME.
also, adhesive genitalia moustaches. [/QUOTE]
If you're not discussing the music and Just want too be a clown don't get invloved with the discussion. Or Join another music forum.
mooghead · Member since
Unless Queen release everything they have ever committed to tape, for free, delivered in person by the 3 of them (the proper 3) and all the soundboard tapes and everything in all of their personal archive then they are wankers who just don't listen to the fans. Actually.. everything everyone here has pretty much been saying for the past 20 years.
I hope they release nothing just to shut you up.
mike hunt · Member since
No moog....Just a proper Anthology. Look at the Interesting stuff on NOTW Box alone. Now Imagine a raw session for every album? And unreleased material like face it alone... I think some of those unreleased songs could be finished with a guest singer. Even if they don't go that route, they still have plenty of interesting stuff like what we got on NOTW.
GAP · Member since
I’d like a short Anthology. I mean a Queen I & II Anthology so this puts together the raw and demos that the group performed from the early era.
mike hunt · Member since
A big Anthology would have the early stuff and the later years. Can't go wrong with that.
ITSM · Member since
Houston '77 on Blu-ray.
Reworked/finished song(s) like Let me in (your heart again).
Mr. Bad Guy on Spotify.
A "mix" of You Are the Only One.
Something special from the A Day at the Races era.
Darren_1977 · Member since
I thought Brian was working on a solo box set along the lines of The Lot, don’t think there has been any update for awhile
Negative Creep · Member since
[QUOTE] [b]mike hunt wrote:[/b]
No moog....Just a proper Anthology.[/QUOTE]
Why bother explaining or justifying anything to a twat like that?!
matt z · Member since
[QUOTE] [b]mike hunt wrote:[/b]
[QUOTE] [b]matt z wrote:[/b]
QUEEN THE TRANSVESTITE COLLECTION
Clothing geared for he him she her ma'am and shim.
Daisy duke short shorts *(jeans)
Half shirts cut and tied at front
For females, belts with dangling front simulated male genitalia
Double sided dildos with each band members face as the tip (*COLLECT ALL FOUR! !!)
WHY NOT BE FORTHRIGHT? WHY NOT PANDER?
NOW IS THE TIME.
also, adhesive genitalia moustaches. [/QUOTE]
If you're not discussing the music and Just want too be a clown don't get invloved with the discussion. Or Join another music forum. [/QUOTE]
Normally you'd be right, but the band hasfour the most part done just that. Anything BUT the music.
Honest answer. The obvious archival material. ..and althoughit's not a good anniversary year. ..the album INNUENDO in DTS 5.1/BLU-RAY 6.1 ...whatever. ..featuring demos, takes and FINALLY the music videos in completion. ..no letterboxing either.
Also the alternate TATDOOL versions and maybe the rushes if people can stomach that.
There's plenty on the cutting room floor with DoRo.
I still think they're going to miss their market on transvestite clothing for the modern day shimberly
matt z · Member since
^also.
Been saying it for years. They could steal the model from KISS and do their own version of KISSTORY:
compiled footage and interspersed television appearances etc by each year documenting the band's development and changes. 4-5 disc sets.
All this stuff has been done so much better by other bands.. heck....even Willie Nelson.
brians wig · Member since
Honesty and transparency.
bootLuca · Member since
[QUOTE] [b]mike hunt wrote:[/b]
I think some of those unreleased songs could be finished with a guest singer.
[/QUOTE]
NO thanks
mooghead · Member since
"Look at the Interesting stuff on NOTW Box alone."
That people STILL complain about because they are hybrids of various takes or not the version that they speculate about being in existence. Why release product to an audience that is never happy?
And why do people still talk about an 'Anthology'? The Beatles did it years ago, why have Queen fans latched on to this as some sort of thing?
Rich Tea · Member since
I find it incredible how people can be so negative but also can see the unrealistic expectations of some.
I will be happy with the promised 70's Live and 80's Live DVD sets so long as they aren't Rare Live botch ups.........
mike hunt · Member since
why are we latching on to the Anthology? Because Queen productions said In the mid 90's, Made In Heaven days that we would get a proper Anthology by 1999........that was my peak love affair with Queen and Remember reading an article by The fan club, I think Jackie was her name, or maybe if greg brooks was hired by then that we would get a big Anthology with lots of unreleased songs and demos, ect.....Fastward to 2017/18 and still nothing. Yea, lot of what would be in the boxset has been released already or leaked on youtube, but it's all scattered on different releases. Would be nice if it was all one set. I'm not so excited for the Anthology like I was back then....but It's the only thing that I would look foward to.....Queen recording with Adam doesn't do it for me, and I think we have enough live stuff.