Which dates are you going to?

Yeah, they haven't moved on, as you well know. So why do you expect fans to "move on"? What is there to move on to? They don't do new music and don;t take risks with setlists. We all know why they;re doing it, and that's fine, but they are not "moving on". So its dumb and condescending telling other fans to do it just because they don't want to hear Brian, Rog and Lambert and you do. You're not being open minded: quite the opposite.

Exactly. This is always so funny reading from Glamberts to "stop living in the past" while QALs newest song is from 1989. I told you the Lamebird freaks are all delusional.....

Glamberts? I'm not a fan, I own none of his music.

Moving on and accepting change doesn't mean you have to like it.

Holly what you or I might like them to play has nothing to do with moving on. I'd love to hear White Queen, Father To Son etc but two thirds of the audience wouldn't have a clue what they were hearing

Freddie unfortunately is no longer here, they've moved on and did something they enjoy. It doesn't actually disrespect anyone unless you're of the mind to think it does.

Queen have not moved on because they have not advanced on what they did with John & Freddie,
Basically this QAL thing is pocket money for May & Taylor, and god forbid if Lambird was allowed to destroy Father to son or White Queen they he would deserve to get pelted with eggs!

Hard to imagine that Karaoke Kid is doing WHite Queen or Father to son. It is enough that he destroys their hits

Simply repeating that they've moved on doesn't mean they have, They tried something new with Paul Rodgers: the album release failed but the tours were successful. So they learned a lesson from that: no more albums, but people will still pay to see some version of Queen live. So they kept the brand name and now play the hits. That is not moving on, that's living off past glories. That's fine if that;s what they want to do. But if it doesn't appeal to some fans that doesn't necessarily make those fans narrow minded.

I feel so bad for the op of this topic. Couldn’t we move all this off-topic bickering to another thread, please? Show some respect.

Respect seems to be asskissing for you inulinger

Holly2003 Well said and i totally agree with your post ! You are a wise Queeny.

Holly they actually played less of a variety of Queen songs over the Paul Rodgers tour than they have with Lambert.

But if you want to use the set list as a barometer of how much they moved on, between 78 and 80 they were almost stagnant!

Vocal harmony - you say you are a Queen fan? I doubt it. Here are two setlists from 1978 and 1980

1978:
https://www.setlist.fm/setlist/queen/1978/the-forum-inglewood-ca-73df6299.html

1980:
https://www.setlist.fm/setlist/queen/1980/olympiahalle-munich-germany-2bdca492.html

How can they be stagnant when they release new albums and play lots of those songs???
As you can see about half of the setlist if 1980 is different to 1978. Not only due to new songs but also some changes when it comes to the old classics. DOnt try
bullshitting us with your drivel that clearly shows that you have no clue what you are talking about. Thank you

In 1978 from the start of the Jazz tour until the end of the European 1980 Game shows the set list had the same structure and pretty much the same running order with in the core of the show.

Don't accuse me of bullshitting especially after reading some of the crap you've posted

I suppose you did not even read the links where you can clearly see that your posting was utter bullshit

Yes I did.

I said "almost stagnan"t, read my post again

Its pretty clear that between the early Jazz shows and 1980 came shows the setlist structure changed little.

Putting the 78 lists side by side with the 80's ones if you weren't aware of the two albums they look like they could be part of a differing list from the same tour

A little? What are you smoking??? YOu did not read those setlists at all. More than 13 songs changed. Learn to read and come back again.