Queen crest Queenzone

Im a really massive Queen Fan but...

25 posts
Thread

Posts in chronological order

· Member since
I saw this commented on one of my youtube videos and i just had to share it. (I deleted the comment because it was just stupid)
I'm a really massive Queen Fan but anything after Queen II is not Queen for me. They Went too commercial for me and everything after is just crappy bubblegum pop. Paul Rodgers Singing Queen is much better but the songs after Queen II are just crappy commercial pop. Queen Sold out during Shear Heart Attack.


Sounds like a typical Genesis Fan...
· Member since
Brighton Rock, Stone Cold Crazy (SHA), Somebody To Love and other tracks from two albums following QII are a real piece of art. I wouldn't dare call them crappy ? Think that even Freddie said that for him, STL is a better written song than Bo Rhap...
· Member since
That fool must have been drunk and stupid in any order. What a full time retard. Thats what I love about Queen they always did their thing, never really went mainstream.
Black Queen marches
· Member since
Queenwent mainstream after Jazz, when they started releasing four singles per album and added synths.
Socialism: There's one for you, nineteen for me Should five per cent appear too small Be thankful I don't take it all
· Member since
God what a load of crap. This forum is going down the shitter now.
This place used to be great, but now it is an absolute joke. For serious Queen discussion, please visit http://www.queenforum.net
· Member since
[QUOTE] [b]Krypto_98 wrote:[/b]

Sounds like a typical Genesis Fan...[/QUOTE]

ha, I hear you. Genesis fans even complained when the Musical Box did A Trick Of The Tail.

Ooooh, it's Phil singing - it must be crap !

Morons.
Queenzone is overrun with trolls and circling the drain - join us here instead: http://queenforum.net
· Member since
[QUOTE] [b]Panchgani wrote:[/b]

Queenwent mainstream after Jazz, when they started releasing four singles per album and added synths.[/QUOTE]

Bingo.

They did what everyone else who wanted to make money did - shifted from albums to singles, because that's what FM radio did.

To dismiss SHA through NOTW is just so foolish. One can say what they want about Jazz onward, but Queen's 74-77 era is pretty spotless.
Queenzone is overrun with trolls and circling the drain - join us here instead: http://queenforum.net
· Member since
[QUOTE] [b]Krypto_98 wrote:[/b]

(I deleted the comment because it was just stupid)
.[/QUOTE]

It's a pity we don't have the same opportunity....
· Member since
Didn't someone close to the band (I wanna say Bob Harris - not sure, though) say that he felt they had veered much away from their original sound when they did ANATO? and that he felt they could have been an amazing Prog Rock band otherwise. Can't recall what the source was for that.
· Member since
Panchgani

Man thats like your opinion.
Black Queen marches
· Member since
I love Queen more from the eighties than from the seventies and I don't care if anyone will say it's stupid or I'm stupid.

I really love their whole work and I like that they created different music over the years.
· Member since
Queen's capacity to entertain did NOT diminish after Queen II. That's all that matters.
Martin
· Member since
I can imagine being a Queen fan and discovering them from that first BBC session and getting the first album and seeing them develop into the harder stuff. Must've been great. I know I've gone off so many bands by album 3. The guy can think what he wants, as different as it seems from our own unique perspectives on Queen in 2018.
· Member since
........looks like he got a bite !
Master Marathon Runner
· Member since
If you can't bite 'em, join 'em