Just look at the artists who have made millions purely based upon looks and how girls fancy and lust after them like, Take That, Justin Bieber, Boyzone, Five, Backstreet Boys, etc..... Lambert is no different. He has no special talent he is just a wannabe would got lucky, i have seen better singers in pubs.
[QUOTE] [b]happystar wrote:[/b]
Just look at the artists who have made millions purely based upon looks and how girls fancy and lust after them like, Take That, Justin Bieber, Boyzone, Five, Backstreet Boys, etc..... Lambert is no different. He has no special talent he is just a wannabe would got lucky, i have seen better singers in pubs.[/QUOTE]
Wow you must have some great pubs where you live, care to share the names of these fabulous singers/bands, I'm always on the lookout for brilliant pub acts, I go to see a lot.
I agree they all have fans and a lot of girls, especially younger ones are as or more interested in looks than talent, but apart from Adam's own fans these shows are also full of older Queen fans like myself, I'm pretty sure most of them aren't there because they think Adam's pretty or whatever. His personality and likeability on the other hand probably does help, but they still all rave about his vocals.
And I was serious about the pub acts, I love going to pub/club gigs.
You may have noticed when people tweet and post on social media, they almost always mention his extraordinary vocals. I just don't see that with other performers. Yea, he is a handsome man, but the focus always seems to be that extraordinary voice. It isn't normal for people to mention things like that on social media platforms, but for Adam they almost always do. Gotta be a reason for that!!
If Queen members were not there then 99% of Queen fans would not attend to see Adam, so you see it is not just Lambert they mainly go to see it is the fact that May & Taylor are 50% of the greatest rock group to have graced a stage from 1971 and Freddie made a name for the boys. The rest is history and without Queen today Lambert would be no where as near close to the music industry as he is now.
Freddie has a better voice than Adam but we all know Lambert is saturated in hype because Brian started all that crap to get bums on seats.
If you think 99% of the fans at each show are just there for Queen, you are even more dense than I thought! You wouldn't believe the Adam fans that go all over the world to see him. Of course, there are way more Queen fans, but Adam has quite a few himself!
[QUOTE] [b]happystar wrote:[/b]
If Queen members were not there then 99% of Queen fans would not attend to see Adam, so you see it is not just Lambert they mainly go to see it is the fact that May & Taylor are 50% of the greatest rock group to have graced a stage from 1971 and Freddie made a name for the boys. The rest is history and without Queen today Lambert would be no where as near close to the music industry as he is now.[/QUOTE]
Well obviously Queen fans go because it's Brian & Roger and Queen music, they wouldn't be going to see Adam solo, his music is so different that bar the one's who've seen him and now say they would see him solo, (and there are quite a few) most wouldn't be interested in his pop music. But if he couldn't sing or they didn't like how he put the songs over, acted on stage etc, there isn't that many who would keep going regardless. Seriously, how many longtime Queen fans who go these shows would still go if they replaced him with Beiber or Britney Spears? I'm guessing not many.
Ha ha Beiber is just as painful a singer as Lambert and Britney Spears is a plastic bubblegum pop artist.
All these American novelty artists cant hold a candle to out British Freddie Mercury.
Dude, Beiber and Britney can't sing. Adam sings amazingly, as well as world class opera singers, Voice and technique wise there is not much difference between Freddie and Adam. And actually Adam has much better technique, as he was trained for many years. It is a matter of which kind of voice do you prefer to hear? Their tone and timbre is much different, but the range is similar. Freddie's voice is deeper, more raspy, falsetto, a more true rock voice. Adam's is a tenor, with a light and airy quality to his voice at times. He rarely sings in falsetto as he can hit those high notes in mixed voice, which very few males can. But as far as actual power and noise producing, there isn't much difference. People would not come out to see Queen if a generic voice were singing. It is the fact that Adam's voice fits Queens huge catalog so well, that is making this a lasing thing. And of course, they love touring together.
[QUOTE] [b]happystar wrote:[/b]
Ha ha Beiber is just as painful a singer as Lambert and Britney Spears is a plastic bubblegum pop artist.
All these American novelty artists cant hold a candle to out British Freddie Mercury.[/QUOTE]
Britney can't sing live and Beiber whilst he can sing doesn't have the range or power to do Queen songs but according to your theory that wouldn't matter in the slightest since people would still flock to the shows to see Brian & Roger.
Snifflese : Adam & Freddie do NOT have similar voices or techniques, how dare you say that.
Mercury is regarded as the greatest male rock voice ever, Lambert has NOT got a rock voice and if he was trained then he needs to get hos money back because he was robbed.
Freddie never had any training to his voice it was a gift from god and he taught himself piano.
Lambert can only dream of been a rock god like Mercury for it will never happen in a million years. Id say Lambert sounds more like Bon Scott who was the first singer in AC/.DC. Lambert screeches like him as well.
[QUOTE] [b]happystar wrote:[/b]
Snifflese : Adam & Freddie do NOT have similar voices or techniques, how dare you say that.
Mercury is regarded as the greatest male rock voice ever, Lambert has NOT got a rock voice and if he was trained then he needs to get hos money back because he was robbed.
Freddie never had any training to his voice it was a gift from god and he taught himself piano.
Lambert can only dream of been a rock god like Mercury for it will never happen in a million years. Id say Lambert sounds more like Bon Scott who was the first singer in AC/.DC. Lambert screeches like him as well.[/QUOTE]
Bit of a contradiction there, you say he hasn't got a rock voice then say he sounds like Bon Scott who if I'm not mistaken was a rock singer, hard rock as it goes for the most part. Adam is nothing like Bon, and his way of singing is the complete opposite, he sings with an open mouth, the way classical singers are taught, no one could say that of Bon Scott. You don't like his singing but to say he needs his money back is just daft. Whether you like how he sings is a different matter but he's incredibly talented and to say otherwise shows a lack of knowledge about singing.
One thing Adam never does is screech anymore! On Idol there were a few screechy songs, but that was a long time ago. I love heavy metal and that is my sweet spot and there is a lot of screeching there, so I know what I am talking about when I say Adam doesn't screech. A lot of the divas screech, IMO, when they go for the high notes. Adam hits those high notes cleanly and so melodically. There are no pop or rock singers that do that. To say otherwise just means you can't hear or you are just so overwhelmed with your dislike of him that you can't be fair. You can say a lot of other things about his voice, but he never screeches and he has an extraordinary voice. we get you don't like him, but why post negative crap all the time (most of which isn't even close to being true?). Most people avoid things when they don't care for them!
