White Privilege

Saint Jiub wrote:

john bodega wrote:

He's right though.

You thinking he is right does not make him right. In my opinion,you are influenced by the same emotional Kool Aid as Real Wizard (as opposed to my "Trump" Kool Aid).

Please stick to the facts, keep out the emotional baggage, and don't shoot the enemy to discredit him based on emotion.

I probably worded that wrong. I hope you understand a little ...

Emotional kool aid? You just can't resist those ad hominem logical fallacies, can you?

I've outlined the issue simply and clearly. Anyone with an IQ above room temperature and free of cognitive dissonance should be able to understand it.

The Real Wizard wrote:

Stick wrote:

Some very narrow perspectives are being displayed here. Please just look at the numbers and see how dumb it is to throw a term like white privilege around regarding shootings.
Or, if you don't like looking stuff up, just listen to someone like Ben Shapiro for instance. He's talked about it enough that a simple youtube search should suffice.

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Ben_Shapiro

Shapiro is not a real intellectual. Like Jordan Peterson, he's a "smart person" for stupid people. These guys are snake oil salesman who know who butters their bread - angry white males. Peterson particularly is well aware that he is making far more money on youtube and patreon than he ever did in academia.

There's a reason why these guys almost never debate other academics - when they do, they get destroyed.

Belittling Insults based on a biased opinion from a liberal elitist who thinks anyone with a differing opinion is stupid.

Also, RationalWiki is far from rational ...

www.quora.com/Is-RationalWiki-a-trustworthy-source

"In my opinion"

Your opinion is worth less than a sofa cushion peanut to me - quit lumping me in with your lazy cartoon idea of anyone that disagrees with you.

Saint Jiub wrote:

Also, RationalWiki is far from rational ...

www.quora.com/Is-RationalWiki-a-trustworthy-source

I see your confirmation bias is still serving you well.

The Real Wizard wrote:

Saint Jiub wrote:

Also, RationalWiki is far from rational ...

www.quora.com/Is-RationalWiki-a-trustworthy-source

I see your confirmation bias is still serving you well.

... I learned my arrogance from the best ... YOU ...

However, I recognize that I might have a kool aid drinking problem.

Whereas you are too drunk on kool aid to know you have a drinking problem ...

Humbly, in my opinion ...

john bodega wrote:

"In my opinion"

Your opinion is worth less than a sofa cushion peanut to me - quit lumping me in with your lazy cartoon idea of anyone that disagrees with you.

I wasn't talking to you. You are hallucinating. In my humble opinion.

Did I just hear a sofa cushion peanut hit the ground? ... or did you just say something that I couldn't give two shits about? ...

You ought not to have hit 'quote' on my post, then. And I asked nicely!

john bodega wrote:

You ought not to have hit 'quote' on my post, then. And I asked nicely!

Sorry my quoting you bothers you.

You WIN.

Hopefully, I can resist further posting in this topic or any other political topic on Queenzone. Posting in political topics is not good for my health.

Nah I just mean, it's a fair assumption that if my words were being quoted you were talking to me, s'all.