Towards the end. Did new Queen songs sound shit live

[QUOTE] [b]andres_clip wrote:[/b]

I do think that Queen followed the flow thrue the years except from the start. It would have been an awesome band in the 90's.[/QUOTE]

Agreed! Looking at the music they created for the band or solo projects from 1987 to 1998 they still got it IMO.

oops

[QUOTE] [b]mooghead wrote:[/b]

Shut up.[/QUOTE]

Your efforts at censorship are pathetic ...

[QUOTE] [b]philip storey wrote:[/b]

Is this really worth discussing ?[/QUOTE]

Yes

[QUOTE] [b]mooghead wrote:[/b]

[QUOTE] [b]SillyGoose wrote:[/b]

@mooghead

At 4087 posts, I believe you're the one who needs to shut up at once. You're taking the deity status thing too far with that attitude, remember it doesn't mean anything.

@ philip

Probably, probably not. What's the criteria for a worthwhile topic? (hint: maybe ask one of your deities ^ like your friend up there.)

As for me: I've read the stupidest things on here about Freddie's chest wig and nobody seems to have a problem with that. So, who knows? Maybe I see more value in the OP's question about this band's music.

This place needs an enema, you bunch of divas. [/QUOTE]

Erm.... Who the fuck are you? [/QUOTE]

Another pathetic attempt at censorship ...

In what way am I trying to censor? Who gives a fuck what I say? I am just sick of stupid questions after years and years of them..

despite getting the popcorn out...
.
back to topic...
.
kind of.
.
well, i think even the new songs of the 2008 tour didn't sound that crappy. wish they had done more performances of "warboys" (yes, yes, penned by paul rodgers... anyway) !