Towards the end. Did new Queen songs sound shit live

andres_clip wrote:

I do think that Queen followed the flow thrue the years except from the start. It would have been an awesome band in the 90's.

Agreed! Looking at the music they created for the band or solo projects from 1987 to 1998 they still got it IMO.

oops

mooghead wrote:

Shut up.

Your efforts at censorship are pathetic ...

philip storey wrote:

Is this really worth discussing ?

Yes

mooghead wrote:

SillyGoose wrote:

@mooghead

At 4087 posts, I believe you're the one who needs to shut up at once. You're taking the deity status thing too far with that attitude, remember it doesn't mean anything.

@ philip

Probably, probably not. What's the criteria for a worthwhile topic? (hint: maybe ask one of your deities ^ like your friend up there.)

As for me: I've read the stupidest things on here about Freddie's chest wig and nobody seems to have a problem with that. So, who knows? Maybe I see more value in the OP's question about this band's music.

This place needs an enema, you bunch of divas.

Erm.... Who the fuck are you?

Another pathetic attempt at censorship ...

In what way am I trying to censor? Who gives a fuck what I say? I am just sick of stupid questions after years and years of them..

despite getting the popcorn out...
.
back to topic...
.
kind of.
.
well, i think even the new songs of the 2008 tour didn't sound that crappy. wish they had done more performances of "warboys" (yes, yes, penned by paul rodgers... anyway) !