Well if you have been a Queen fan for 44 years you were not taking much attention were you?
You accept from a magnificent brilliant front man only to be replaced by a guy who came from nothing and now hyped up by lies and deceit from Brian May!
You must have your eyes closed and you must be deaf.
Saint Jiub: You are another idiot and judas if you have been a Queen fan for 44 years.
Even the wise John Deacon refuses to get involved with this embarrassment they call Queen +
Dont sit there and call yourself a Queen fan and stab Freddie in the fucking back you piece of shit.
Saint Jiub wrote "Quite simple really, don't read it ... especially if responding to QAL raises your blood pressure.
Personally, I avoid the QAL section as it does not interest me. "
That's a bit of a weird response.
Until you've read something you don't know what's been written.
Unless you're advocating for people who tire of the arguments over Lambert to not come onto a Queen forum whatsoever. In which case it goes back to what I originally said: There's a section for Queen+Lambert on this forum, and the Lambert crap be kept to there where it belongs. Quite simple really.
So there must have been many people on the Queen fan club facebook site that also hate Queen+
Many do not like it but why must they have to stay quiet for?
They are entitled to air there views again and again because glamberts do.
Sealion wrote "As I said before, you are right, that the OP posted in the wrong section of the forum. Mistakes happen. And in this forum, it‘s not possible to change that afterwards. So repeating your complaint won‘t help.
I have no problem otherwise to keep the Q+ stuff separate. But it would be great, if the members, who hate the collaboration, would stay away from there.
As a little hint: The Official Queen Fanclub has a closed Facebook side with thousands of fans. It‘s moderated, so no shitfests. Most members there simply had enough of the arguments on the official page. Shit stirrer get thrown out fast."
I repeated what i said based on your reply.
Everything in its right place, and then it's up to people whether they visit said place or not, whether they like or dislike the collaboration.
For many long term Queen fans, it would've been better if a separate Facebook page was created for the Queen+ Lambert stuff. I've unfollowed in the past when they get heavy on posting Lambert photos. After all, I'm a fan of Queen: Freddie Mercury, Brian May, Roger Taylor, John Deacon (which is what the Facebook Queen page describes Queen as, which is what Queen was).
I'm not a fan of Queen+, May and Taylor going under the banner of Queen+ with a fill-in bass players and singers. Especially Lambert. I saw them in 2012, and it was great to see Roger and Brian again, but I find Lambert a little unbearable.
That said, it's all about money and getting people to the concerts including other long term Queen fans, like me, who want to see Brian and Roger play live again, so of course they'll promote it on the Queen page where there's thousands upon thousands of fans.
It's not hard to see how the page ended up divided, between lot of Queen fans and a Glamberts policing the page, telling anyone who voices their view that they don't agree with to go elsewhere.
Saint Jiub wrote "I did not advocate for avoiding Queenzone."
Yes, I wasn't sure whether that was the case, but I see that now.
The reply button doesn't work for me on here anymore btw, hence I write the name and put the quote myself.
