Allow me to put an end to the Freddie/Adam debate once and for all

[QUOTE] [b]happystar wrote:[/b]

Mistercosmicc: If i had posted that then all the nasties on this site would have abused me once again but yeah you are right Lambert is lazy on stage and puts no effort in to his limp performances, Freddie used to be drenched in sweat five minutes from going on stage as he put so much energy into his power packed performances.[/QUOTE]

Yeah, and the simple fact that in the '70s and '80s, stage lighting was extremely hot while nowadays it's nowhere near that doesn't have anything to do with it, of course...

So, you're back and still clueless.

[QUOTE] [b]thomasquinn 32989 wrote:[/b]

[QUOTE] [b]happystar wrote:[/b]

Mistercosmicc: If i had posted that then all the nasties on this site would have abused me once again but yeah you are right Lambert is lazy on stage and puts no effort in to his limp performances, Freddie used to be drenched in sweat five minutes from going on stage as he put so much energy into his power packed performances.[/QUOTE]

Yeah, and the simple fact that in the '70s and '80s, stage lighting was extremely hot while nowadays it's nowhere near that doesn't have anything to do with it, of course...

So, you're back and still clueless.[/QUOTE]

This is true and way beyond happystar's thinking

Banks of Parcan lamps like Queen used generated huge amounts of heat, to the point that the bars the lamps were bolted too that attached to the trusses were sometime almost to hot to touch immediately after a gig, the lamp casings certainly were.

The Pizza oven rig was actually covered which meant there was no escape route for any heat above he stage.

Modern lights use far les power, the light intensity is generated by lenses which are constantly changing focus and direction. Very often the light source is LED which produces very little heat.

THANK GOD THAT WAS FINALLY SETTLED! Lambert fans are delusional and unaware of anything called context, talent, musicianship.


Finally,... it can be laid to rest

Matt z Careful with slagging Lamboat off or you will have Vocal Harmony and Wizard on your back, those two are like Hinge & Bracket.

[QUOTE] [b]happystar wrote:[/b]

Matt z Careful with slagging Lamboat off or you will have Vocal Harmony and Wizard on your back, those two are like Hinge & Bracket.[/QUOTE]

Can you not tell the difference between saying something once and saying something a thousand times purely to be a troll?

I guess you just can't take a hint. It won't take long before you're banned from this forum again.

why is Lame-Bird topic of "Serious Discussion". He was a joke and will always be one

[QUOTE] [b]runner_70 wrote:[/b]

why is Lame-Bird topic of "Serious Discussion". He was a joke and will always be one[/QUOTE]

Why do you obsess so much about him? So much so that it occupies your every waking moment, to the point that you have to write about him. Every. Single. Day.

A healthier way would be to avoid this forum. It would be so much better for your mental stability. It would allow you to have an original thought.

Or, do you have a secret man crush on him, and have felt spurned because he has never responded positively to you?

This is the SERIOUS DISCUSSION forum not the Lametard section! More over: Fuck you asshole

Serious Discussions on Queenzone are unimaginable because there are too many idiots on here who cannot discuss but tear other peoples opinions apart, and there are too many bullies on here leaded by Wizard, Vocal Harmony who over the years have made many Queen fans leave this site through there vile bullying.

[QUOTE] [b]happystar wrote:[/b]

Serious Discussions on Queenzone are unimaginable because there are too many idiots on here who cannot discuss but tear other peoples opinions apart, and there are too many bullies on here leaded by Wizard, Vocal Harmony who over the years have made many Queen fans leave this site through there vile bullying.[/QUOTE]

Please feel free to name the people who have left because they have been bullied by The Real Wizard or myself.

While you're doing that I'm sure you will recall that you've told people on here regularly to fuck off, that they are cunts, paedophiles, nonces, any number of gay slurs (pretty stupid coming from you) and a string of sexual abusive comments directed at the women on the AL threads.

Then when anyone had the guts to stand up to you, you pull the bullying card out.

You are an idiot of the highest order .

We all know that SC and VH are he lunatics of QZ. The best effect of QAL ending will be that those two will vanish into obscurity soon and end up on those Glambert fanpages where all those grannies rave over the annoying tool

[QUOTE] [b]Golden Salmon wrote:[/b]

Allow me to put an end to the Freddie/Adam debate once and for all:

Freddie: good
Adam: bad

[/QUOTE]

There you go! if he said it must be true

"Flat out, Adam is a better singer than Freddie."


Nope. Not in the slightest. Perhaps you think it's about hitting the high notes live all the time, but then Roger Taylor could do that. Freddie had a far better voice overall. Lambert's tone is harsh and grating, whereas Freddie's was wonderful to listen to.

There's a reason you don't see Lambert topping many best rock singer polls, whereas you do with when it comes to Freddie Mercury.

Also, I highly doubt there'll be any scientific studies on Lambert's voice a quarter of a century after he snuffs it.

"Adam is more fun onstage than Freddie was. Both reach across the stage lights and connect with the audience, but Adam is more lighthearted with a sense of humor and a little absurdity. When Freddie was at the piano, the audience connection was reduced. Adam is out front and interacting throughout the whole concert."

Nope. Lambert doesn't come across as authentic at all. He's also cringe-worthy to look at.

There's a reason why you don't see Lambert topping greatest frontman polls and Freddie Mercury does.

"Adam is more enjoyable to look at. Beautiful. Graceful. Moving like a dancer."

Nope. He's a chubby fucker who looks tacky and embarrassing.