Queen crest Queenzone

QUEEN REVISITED

19 posts
Thread

Posts in chronological order

· Member since
Hi Everyone!!

After listening to the revisited versions included in the 2011 remasters and the version of "Do not Stop Me Now" included in the soundtrack of the film Bohemian Rhapsody I would go crazy to hear all the discography of Queen passed by this same modern process of mix, don't you think? Listen All the songs mixed with these contemporary mixing techniques, It would be a dream for me ... Does anyone know if there is this future possibility of this happening?
· Member since
Do Not Stop Me Now. Is that a New Song???
This place used to be great, but now it is an absolute joke. For serious Queen discussion, please visit http://www.queenforum.net
· Member since
If people can call Freddie Mercury, Frederick Mercury then I think Do Not Stop Me Now is also apropriate.
"On the first day Pim & Niek created a heavenly occupation. Pim & Niek blessed it and named it 'Loosch'." (Genesis 1:1)
· Member since
It's a great song, but not as good as It Is Late, If You Can Not Beat Them or Leaving Home Is Not Easy.
"On the first day Pim & Niek created a heavenly occupation. Pim & Niek blessed it and named it 'Loosch'." (Genesis 1:1)
· Member since
Do Not Lose Your Head
Do Not Try So Hard
Do Not Try Suicide
I Am Going Slightly Mad
We Are All God's People
You Are My Best Friend
I Am In Love With My Car
Now I Am Here
You Do Not Fool Me
Gullibility and credulity are considered undesirable qualities in every department of human life -- except religion.
· Member since
xD Jesus christ, guys.

Ontopic: Yes i think some albums could use some freshing up (esp. Jazz). As long as there is no brickwalling.
We love you Mandy!
· Member since
"Do Not Stop Me Now" doesn't have the urgency.
Martin
· Member since
FriedChicken

It's a great song, but not as good as It Is Late, If You Can Not Beat Them or Leaving Home Is Not Easy.

HAHAHAHAHA
· Member since
Out of any artist around at the same time as Queen in the 70s, their mixes are head and shoulders above pretty much any other, so in response to your question as to whether they should remix anything, my answer is a clear no. Perhaps the first album where they were finding their feet and the drums sound leaves a lot to be desired but other than that, why would you?

Revisiting or re-recording tracks is a different argument (My Life Has Been Saved, or several versions of WWRY for example), and if they wanted to do alternate versions then I wouldn’t mind hearing their current thoughts on how things could/might sound (though the new Don’t Stop Me Now is by no means an improvemt, just an alternative version).
cmsdrums http://totalrecallband.wix.com/site www.facebook.com/totalrecalluk
· Member since
Leaving aside my grammatical error that I admit was very funny for example the version "The Hero" Revisited is incredible, like Rock Montreal, When using these new techniques they appreciate much more the arrangements of the band and that powerful and devastating sound ... Imagine having all the discrography like that! It would be a dream for me...
· Member since
[QUOTE] [b]Bohardy wrote:[/b]

Do Not Lose Your Head
Do Not Try So Hard
Do Not Try Suicide
I Am Going Slightly Mad
We Are All God's People
You Are My Best Friend
I Am In Love With My Car
Now I Am Here
You Do Not Fool Me[/QUOTE]

Does "1939" also count?
· Member since
[QUOTE] [b]Fireplace wrote:[/b]

[QUOTE] [b]Bohardy wrote:[/b]

Do Not Lose Your Head
Do Not Try So Hard
Do Not Try Suicide
I Am Going Slightly Mad
We Are All God's People
You Are My Best Friend
I Am In Love With My Car
Now I Am Here
You Do Not Fool Me[/QUOTE]

Does "1939" also count?[/QUOTE]

Haha, definitely!

Think Do Not Lose Your Head is my favourite. So much better.

It Is A Beautiful Day
See What A Fool I Have Been

I guess we have to have Breakthrough too.

Think that's about it. Back to the topic...
Gullibility and credulity are considered undesirable qualities in every department of human life -- except religion.
· Member since
I don't think '39 was specifically 1939 was it? Probably 1539.
· Member since
[QUOTE] [b]dysan wrote:[/b]

I don't think '39 was specifically 1939 was it? Probably 1539.[/QUOTE]

Or possibly 2139 if it features people being able to head off in space rockets!
cmsdrums http://totalrecallband.wix.com/site www.facebook.com/totalrecalluk
· Member since
Either way, good song ruined by the writer's explanation :)