Deacon Article

Of course May & Taylor will slag Deacon off because they know he has a clear conscience and not defaced Queen like those have.
They know truthfully it aint Queen in any shape or form.
I have more respect for Deacon than i do for May & Taylor who have become the kray twins in the music industry.

That comparison doesn't make sense.

Roger was pretty nasty saying john is a sociopath and he struggled with drink and drugs - really?
Brian saying john was so delicate for the band, i would call that pretty disrespectful on May & Taylor's side.
Those two should look at themselves for been back stabbers, how about informing the fans truthfully that Lambert is full time in Queen and not a Queen + guest for a start?
That was very deceitful and sneaky in my mind, and they did con the fans there.
Deacon is best out of it now.

[QUOTE] [b]Mr Right wrote:[/b]

Roger was pretty nasty saying john is a sociopath and he struggled with drink and drugs - really?
Brian saying john was so delicate for the band, i would call that pretty disrespectful on May & Taylor's side.
Those two should look at themselves for been back stabbers, how about informing the fans truthfully that Lambert is full time in Queen and not a Queen + guest for a start?
That was very deceitful and sneaky in my mind, and they did con the fans there.
Deacon is best out of it now. [/QUOTE]

How do you work out Lambert is full time in Queen? One of the reasons it's Queen + aside from them not wanting it to be a replacement Freddie is that he has his own solo career and doesn't actually want to be just part of Queen. Also I doubt Roger actually called John a sociopath or if he did as someone else said it was likely his weird sense of humor which never translates well into print. I've heard him say he's anti-social or similar but if he did actually say sociopath without joking then he obviously doesn't know what it means. Either way he didn't mean John is one, it wouldn't make any sense whatsoever.

[QUOTE] [b]dysan wrote:[/b]

I really respect Deacon, and that article makes me respect him even more.[/QUOTE]

Full Ack.

eh?

I'd wager a good £20 that Roger meant to say 'sociophobe', not 'sociopath'.

And it IS a tabloid, after all.

But leave it to moron like "Mr Right" to use this article as fodder to yet again fuel his confirmation bias and make this about Adam Lambert.

Dysan—One needs the urban dictionary to understand people under a certain age. Full Ack means he agrees with you 100%

And that is an amazing jumper! I’m a knitter and I’ve not seen anything quite like that.

Real Wizard You have to lower the tone with your constant verbal vomit, just stick to what you know best i.e "Peppa Pig "

Mr Deacon had some sense unlike the other two......

"The barman who used to serve him at his local pub revealed that he'd been warned by Deacon's wife Veronica who the musician was — and was told not to mention Queen."

It might be because John's just sick of talking about Queen.

... Or rather, he doesn't want members of the public hassling him about Queen.

*tells barmaid in Putney pub that the bassist from Queen is a regular and not to mention Queen as he's dealing with loads of mental shit about his previous life in the band*

*gobshite barmaid tell all her pals who only have a vague inkling of who Queen are and they all descend on the pub to take selfie and put on Instagram about how amazing they are*

[QUOTE] [b]Mr Right wrote:[/b]

Mr Deacon had some sense unlike the other two......[/QUOTE]

He's right, there is only one Freddie and you can't replace him, that's why they got someone who doesn't sound or look like him and called themselves Queen + and said it's a collaboration. Just because John couldn't face carrying on with the band or didn't want to for his own reasons doesn't mean they should have retired, everyone handles life differently.