Queen crest Queenzone

Trying to correct hyde park 76 audio

62 posts Page 2 of 5
Thread

Posts in chronological order

· Member since
If you really want to have a go, I'll make a high res mono transfer for you to work with.
Perhaps you could try tinkering with a sample of White Queen first?
If so, drop me a pm with your email address.
· Member since
Please look at PM Marlamir, talk to you I have about this venture.
· Member since
@The Kurgan
I'm not 100% sure in this but i think i will try something to do and if you will be able to do the mono transfer that would be truly outstanding from you but i think the sample first will be better idea to see if its worth it or not. Check your pm kurgan.

@MarlspalQ
Thanks, i will check the message.
· Member since
I sent you a raw 24/96 link, good luck and don't worry (I'm not expecting miracles!)
· Member since
I hope something interesting can result from this, so an improved audio could be used for a BD edition.
Thanks to everyone involved.
· Member since
[QUOTE] [b]MackMantilla wrote:[/b]
I hope something interesting can result from this, so an improved audio could be used for a BD edition.
Thanks to everyone involved.[/QUOTE]
So you are upscaling (re-encoding) an already re-encoded source, or am I misunderstanding?
· Member since
Ok so i try to do some work with the kurgan sample and the result are pretty much same as before. Some flutter was removed completely and the stronger ones was reduced. Also i tried to reduced the disortion artifacts at least little bit and here is the result. Result are that you will hear the changes but its still not perfect and because of audio quality and i dont think i can do much more to it. What do you think?
· Member since
Nice try, it still sounds pretty bad at 1:24 and 2:08 though.
· Member since
Honestly im not sure how to fix those type of things.
· Member since
No worries, it would probably take some extreme adjustment within the software (I'll look into it).
Or you could patch in the alternative sample I sent you instead?
· Member since
Mate, I think that sounds MUCH better. Obviously not perfect, but a big improvement.
· Member since
Check again the PM Marlamir thank you much.
· Member since
Thank you Thistle very much and thank you Kurgan for the file, can i ask from what source was it? never heard version without those two pitch wow things.

Now can i ask you kurgan for the full source if you don't mind? I think i will try the whole thing, for me any improvements are welcome. Thank you :)

@MarlspalQ
I will soon.

Here is the patched sample with slightly reduced noise aswell


https://drive.google.com/open?id=1B9mluCQnvjGztgXCUn8hL11amXxKxJbd
· Member since
I have emailed you all the file links.
I've also asked the author of the software (who resides at the traders' den) if he considers the wow and flutter any more fixable, considering the severity.
I'll let you know if he replies and offers any assistance.
· Member since
I recived your email kurgan, thank you VERY much for your help and time. You are awesome man.

[QUOTE] [b]The Kurgan wrote:[/b]

I've also asked the author of the software (who resides at the traders' den) if he considers the the wow and flutter any more fixable, considering the severity.
I'll let you know if he replies and offers any assistance.
[/QUOTE]

Allrighty then, sounds interesting.